At Sat Dec 13 14:02:53 2003, J. S. Greenfield wrote:
>
> On a related note...I presume that when the bayesian classification runs
> during normal operation, SA headers have not yet been added to the messages.
>
> Does that imply one needs to be careful to feed non-filtered messages
> (i.e., wit
Vee Persaud said:
>
>> Please send the headers from both the first and the second messages.
>> Without more information all anyone can do is wildly guess.
>>
> BEFORE sa-learn
> X-Spam-Level: ***
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
> rocco.ncr.pwgsc.gc.ca
> X
At 03:04 PM 12/3/2003, Vee Persaud wrote:
BEFORE sa-learn
From: "Vee Persaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60
AFTER sa-learn
From: "Vee Persaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 requir
At 03:28 PM 12/3/2003, Vee Persaud wrote:
I was planning on just forwarding any suspect spam emails to an email
account on my SA server and running it through sa-learn. I guess that
this isn't the correct way to do it ???
No.. that is a *VERY* bad idea to do, because it will cause sa-learn to
l
Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:24 PM 12/3/2003, Vee Persaud wrote:
>> It got a score of 3.3. I ran sa-learn --spam on this message and
>> now I get a score of 3.0 if I resend the message. I'm a bit
>> confused. Did I do something wrong ???
>
> How did you "resend" the message?
>
> If you "resen
At 02:24 PM 12/3/2003, Vee Persaud wrote:
It got a score of 3.3. I ran sa-learn --spam on this message and now I
get a score of 3.0 if I resend the message. I'm a bit confused. Did I
do something wrong ???
How did you "resend" the message?
If you "resend" the message, merely by making a new
> Please send the headers from both the first and the second messages.
> Without more information all anyone can do is wildly guess.
>
BEFORE sa-learn
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 18730 invoked by uid 197); 3 Dec 2003 18:59:54 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by rocco b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I received an email on one of my systems that is not running SA and I
> decided to forward it to my SA system to see if it would get
> rejected. The subject was "Have amazing s\ex up to 20 times per day
> lugpsxw". They use the "/" in the body also to avoid spam detect
Vee Persaud said:
> I received an email on one of my systems that is not running SA and I
> decided to forward it to my SA system to see if it would get rejected.
> The subject was "Have amazing s\ex up to 20 times per day lugpsxw".
> They use the "/" in the body also to avoid spam detection.
--On Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:24 PM -0500 Vee Persaud
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I received an email on one of my systems that is not running SA and I
> decided to forward it to my SA system to see if it would get rejected.
> The subject was "Have amazing s\ex up to 20 times per day lu
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 7:27 PM
To: S. M. C. Butler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn question
Hello S.,
Thursday, November 27, 2003, 3:49:46 PM, you wrote:
SMCB> * sa-learn --show
Hello S.,
Thursday, November 27, 2003, 3:49:46 PM, you wrote:
SMCB> * sa-learn --showdots --spam ./Mail/spam_new
SMCB> and got
SMCB> .
SMCB> Learned from 0 message(s) (37 message(s) examined).
SMCB> Did this work? Seems like it didn't..
It looks to me l
At 03:49 PM 11/27/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
Ø sa-learn --showdots --spam ./Mail/spam_new
and got
.
Learned from 0 message(s) (37 message(s) examined).
Did this work? Seems like it didnt..
Yep, that means that SA has already learned all 37 messages i
Hello German,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 8:11:15 AM, you wrote:
GS> Hi list, i have some questions about sa-learn.
GS> It is possible to run sa-learn while spamd is running?
GS> It is possible to run sa-learn --rebuild while spamd is running?
Yes.
-Abigail
---
Sure:
sa-learn --spam --dir /var/spool/mailbox/224/sa_spam/in/*orourke.ca
Dan Tappin wrote:
I have created spam and ham accounts to utilize sa-learn. I am using
Tenon's Post.Office on OS X as a mail server.
I was running sa-learn like this:
sa-learn --spam --dir /var/spool/mailbox/224/sa_spam/
Oops... drop the --dir parameter (assuming your copy of SA is updated
-- the --dir and --file parameters are deprecated).
Patrick Morris wrote:
Sure:
sa-learn --spam --dir /var/spool/mailbox/224/sa_spam/in/*orourke.ca
Dan Tappin wrote:
I have created spam and ham accounts to utilize sa-learn
I use readpst. I have a spam mailbox in Exchange. The smarthost has "-B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the spamass-milter script. Export the hams and spams
into a pst and ftp them to the Smarthost.
Readpst is part of libpst_0.3.4.tgz, currently in Beta, you can download
it from here: http://sourceforge.net
At 05:22 PM 7/23/2003 +1000, Rod wrote:
Hello.
I have just implemented Spamassassin into my E-mail filter and
would like some help with sa-learn.
I have all e-mail incomming going to directory /var/spool/mail/user
I'm running Linux, the OS version I doubt would b
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 02:47:50PM -0400, Wendell Smith wrote:
> I am trying to feed sa-learn some spam/ham and I was wondering
> something...
>
> Can I feed sa-learn ONE file that contains a large number of emails? I
> ask this because I use Evolution and sort my mail into folders. Now
> instead
At 02:47 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, Wendell Smith wrote:
Can I feed sa-learn ONE file that contains a large number of emails?
It should work if it's in mbox format and you tell sa-learn to use that
format. The alternative is to use a tool to split it out into many files in
a single directory and use the
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:22:14PM -0400, Wendell Smith wrote:
> I appreciate the help but um... you didn't really answer my
> question
> So is it bad to push one piece of mail though sa-learn or not?
I can't see anything wrong with it - there's a --single option (see sa-learn
--h
You're misinterpreting the man page:
"Another thing to be aware of, is that typically you should aim to train
with at least 1000 messages of spam, and 1000 ham messages, if
possible. More is better, but anything over about 5000 messages does
not improve accuracy significantly in our tests."
T
I appreciate the help but um... you didn't really answer my
question
reread please...
I read in the FAQ that if SA makes an error in judgment with respect to
its bayes filter that I can use sa-learn to correct this
I have also read that it is best to only do this with around 1000 pieces
of
spamassassin -D --lint, read up at the top where it tells you how many messages are in
the Bayes database. Then run sa-learn. Then do it again. You'll see it incremented
accordingly.
-Original Message-
From: Marek Dohojda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:12 PM
--On Friday, February 21, 2003 07:54:55 -0800 Jeff Grossman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My mailboxes on my linux machine are in mbx format. How can I use
sa-learn on those types of mailboxes?
get the imap-utils, and use icat to convert to mbox temporarily (or on a
more recent
c-client, use mai
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:43:20 -0500
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:27:03AM -0600, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> > They're only in 2.50; 2.50 should be released in a week or two.
>
> FYI: The "official" answer is sometime Q1 2003. :) We're still doing
> bug fixes a
26 matches
Mail list logo
