Hi there!
Recently I wondered why my spamd called by exim by
exim.conf:spamd_address = 127.0.0.1 783
is not adding asterisk to the mails.
I found out, that the whole /etc/spamassassin/local.cf seems not to be
read by spamassasin. regardeless as which user I call "spamassassin -t
< mail" or "cat
Hi, I have couple of questions regarding spamc/spamd.
Our email server has very heavy traffic each day (several hundred per
minute in peak time). So we are running spamd/spamc. We have noticed
some problems:
we are using sendmail. In sendmail.cf we set the local mailer
(Mblocal)
Hey all. This morning, with all the noise regarding Osirusoft going
down, my mailserver very nearly fell over. This was partly due to the
sudden spike in perl processes being opened.
Well, I'd like to see what can be done to move to spamd/spamc, but
I'm a little rusty with some of this stuff.
R
Hello,
I'm running spamd/spamc pair. I was using popfile and it was working quite
fine. But because it was not originaly meant for blocking spam and it
doesn't have a multi-user support i'm giving spamassassin a try.
Anyways, when running the spamd/spamc pair, when i don't supply a path for
token
Hi,
I have a question regarding the parameters to spamd/spamc.
What I'm hoping to achieve is a setup where user_prefs are read from
SQL but also have per-user bayes filtering and possibly per-user
auto-whitelisting.
To make things more fun the server doesn't have any users physically
installed
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:33:00PM +0300, Vasantha Narayanan wrote:
> Can you explain this further. Previously when i made SpamAssassin
> work with MailScanner, in the MailScanner.conf file, I had to set
> "Use SpamAssassin" to "yes". Are you saying I don't have to do
> that now? If so, how do
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:06:27AM +0300, Hannu Liljemark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:57:00PM +0300, Vasantha Narayanan wrote:
>
> > The documentation seems to indicate, spamd and spamc are
> > included in the distribution. But I can't find it. Can you
> > please tell me where it is? D
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:57:00PM +0300, Vasantha Narayanan wrote:
> The documentation seems to indicate, spamd and spamc are
> included in the distribution. But I can't find it. Can you
> please tell me where it is? Do I need to build it first?
Look in places like /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin,
Installing SpamAssassin made mail processing really slow and so I wanted to
try the spamd/spamc approach. The documentation seems to indicate, spamd
and spamc are included in the distribution. But I can't find it. Can you
please tell me where it is? Do I need to build it first?
Also, the do
Installing SpamAssassin made mail processing really slow and so I wanted to
try the spamd/spamc approach. The documentation seems to indicate, spamd
and spamc are included in the distribution. But I can't find it. Can you
please tell me where it is? Do I need to build it first?
Also, the do
Hi people, i would like to know if there are some
good tips to have the fastest spamd server (besides the hardware in use)
for a heavy use.
TIA
German
information
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> William Stearns
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 3:20 PM
> To: Ed Kasky
> Cc: ML-spamassassin-talk; William Stearns
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamd/spamc performance
>
>
I was thinking about adding a different way to pass user info to spamd, so
we wouldn't need all these hacks to lookup username for all the different
configurations.
I was thinking of adding a -D option to spamc which would be the path to
the users home directory.
Then spamd would be modified to t
I posted about this a couple of weeks ago, and have not recieved feedback.
When using "spamassassin" it works fine, but uses resources like crazy.
when using spamc/spamd, every mail that comes through is passes every
test. resulting in a spam score of 0.0
Even when I pipe the sample-spam.tx
Classification: PUBLIC
I should note that I snipped off all the variable assignment for clarity...
|-Original Message-
|From: Smart, Dan
|Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:55 AM
|To: 'Thomas Nyman'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamd/spamc and J.Hardin Email
PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:39 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [SAtalk] spamd/spamc and J.Hardin Email-Sanitizer
|
|
|Hi
|
|I've just implemented spamd/spamc however it seems that when I
|do my email-sanitizer rules are ignored...do
Hi
I've just implemented spamd/spamc however it seems that when I do my
email-sanitizer rules are ignored...does anyone know why this might be?
Thomas
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Colo
I have:
* Mail-SpamAssassin-2.31.tar.gz
[lloy0076@linux lloy0076]% uname -a
Linux linux 2.4.18-SGI_XFS_1.1 #1 Wed Apr 17 11:18:22 CDT 2002 i686
unknown
[lloy0076@linux lloy0076]$ rpm -qa | grep send
sendmail-cf-8.11.2-14
mgetty-sendfax-1.1.25-2
sendmail-8.11.2-14
[lloy0076@linux lloy0076]$ rp
Well, depends. You can also use procmail/spamc/spamd if you want -- the
original question was how to use the content_filter stuff in postfix though, and
to do that, you need to talk SMTP back and forth with postfix; spamproxyd does
all that stuff, then makes calls out to spamd using the same prot
Craig R Hughes said:
> Yup, here you go, take a look at the spamproxy subdirectory in the
> distribution!
So for postfix one should use spamproxyd instead of spamd/spamc?
Doesn't taht counter the sitewide instructions for using /etc/procmail
:0fw
| spam c
???
If spamproxy is better or easier
Yup, here you go, take a look at the spamproxy subdirectory in the distribution!
C
JW> Is anyone on this list using SpamAssassin with Postfix? More
JW> specifically, spamd/spamc? I'm trying to integrate it into the
JW> content_filter, and haven't found any examples on how exactly to do
JW> thi
Is anyone on this list using SpamAssassin with Postfix? More
specifically, spamd/spamc? I'm trying to integrate it into the
content_filter, and haven't found any examples on how exactly to do
this. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Justin.
--
--
Hi,
I'm working on using SpamAssassin within a perl mail processing script.
In order to reduce overheads, I'm not loading the mail being processed
into a variable and load new instances of Mail::SpamAssassin every time,
but instead am running spamd and getting the script to check the mails
agains
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:39:44AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
| Cayce, I think what you're seeing in the logs is the process id, not the
| port number. Port number stays the same. But new processes are
| spawned, so the process id keeps going up.
Depends on which port you're talking about. The
Cayce, I think what you're seeing in the logs is the process id, not the
port number. Port number stays the same. But new processes are
spawned, so the process id keeps going up.
C
On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 09:44, Cayce Will wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I noticed in my spamd logs that the port that sp
Hello all,
I noticed in my spamd logs that the port that spamd/c connect on is
always incremented upward. Is this normal behavior? What happens
when a port number is hard coded for spamd and spamc? Do they start
to increment from there?
I'd just like to know what is supposed to happen. I wa
Ian Briggs said:
> smrsh: spamassassin not available for sendmail programs
smrsh is a pain.
You need to look for a dir called "smrsh", probably in /etc,
and make a symbolic link to the "spamassassin" and/or "spamc"
commands in there.
BTW re: Net::DNS -- I don't recommend using perl RPMs unle
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Jason Kohles wrote:
> Your sendmail is installed using a restricted shell which only allows you
> to pipe mail to certain programs, spamassassin is not one of those programs.
Bingo! That was incredibly simple to fix. I'd mentally set aside a
couple of hours to get my head
>Is there any way to unrestrict it, or make spamassaassin one of the
>allowable programs?
If memory serves, in /etc/smrsh, look at what's linked -- you'll probably
need to symlink spamassassin into that directory.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Jason Kohles wrote:
> I should have mentioned that smrsh is the restricted shell in question, see
> the man page for it to see how to fix this issue.
Thanks, I'll have a read.
Ian
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Jason Kohles wrote:
> > smrsh: spamassassin not available for sendmail programs
> > 554 5.0.0 "| spamassassin || exit 75"... Service unavailable
> >
> Your sendmail is installed using a restricted shell which only allows you
> to pipe mail to certain programs, spamassassin is
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:51:44AM -0500, Jason Kohles wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:37:11PM +, Ian Briggs wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ged Haywood wrote:
> > > "| spamassassin || exit 75"
> >
> > Further to my previous reply, my test message just bounced back at me from
> > Mai
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:37:11PM +, Ian Briggs wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ged Haywood wrote:
> > "| spamassassin || exit 75"
>
> Further to my previous reply, my test message just bounced back at me from
> Mail Delivery Subsystem with the following error:
>
> smrsh: spamassassin not
Hi there,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ian Briggs wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ged Haywood wrote:
> > "| spamassassin || exit 75"
>
> Further to my previous reply, my test message just bounced back at me from
> Mail Delivery Subsystem with the following error:
>
>- The following addresses
Hi there,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ian Briggs wrote:
> > "| spamassassin || exit 75"
>
> I've just tried that, but it lost a test email I sent mayself.
Hmmm. Then I think there's something wrong with the installation.
What OS and Perl are you using? Did you compile it yourself?
> I had numerous
Shouldn't you specify the path to spamassassin?
--
ed
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ged Haywood wrote:
> > "| spamassassin || exit 75"
>
> Further to my previous reply, my test message just bounced
> back at me from
> Mail Delivery Subsystem with the following error:
>
>- The following addre
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ged Haywood wrote:
> "| spamassassin || exit 75"
Further to my previous reply, my test message just bounced back at me from
Mail Delivery Subsystem with the following error:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
"| spamassassin || exit 75"
(r
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ged Haywood wrote:
> Do you have sendmail running on your local machine? If so, the
> simplest thing to do is to put a .forward file in your home directory
> which contains the following line (including the quotes)
>
> "| spamassassin || exit 75"
I've just tried that, but it
Hi there,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Ian Briggs wrote:
> I've almost got SA running, but I've hit a final stumbling block: how do I
> make it work (preferably as a daemon) with a sendmail/fetchmail/pine
Do you have sendmail running on your local machine? If so, the
simplest thing to do is to put a .
I've almost got SA running, but I've hit a final stumbling block: how do I
make it work (preferably as a daemon) with a sendmail/fetchmail/pine
combination? I'm a newbie at this kind of thing, so I don't quite
understand how the pieces fit together. (I've looked through the mailing
list archive
40 matches
Mail list logo
