Well, depends. You can also use procmail/spamc/spamd if you want -- the original question was how to use the content_filter stuff in postfix though, and to do that, you need to talk SMTP back and forth with postfix; spamproxyd does all that stuff, then makes calls out to spamd using the same protocol as spamc.
It is a work in progress, that's true. It should be good enough to work though. I personally use postfix/procmail/spamc rather than spamproxyd, but I don't need whatever performance boost spamproxyd might yield. C LuKreme wrote: L> Craig R Hughes said: L> > Yup, here you go, take a look at the spamproxy subdirectory in the L> > distribution! L> L> So for postfix one should use spamproxyd instead of spamd/spamc? L> L> Doesn't taht counter the sitewide instructions for using /etc/procmail L> L> :0fw L> | spam c L> L> ??? L> L> If spamproxy is better or easier or whatever tehn great. My impression L> from the readme was that it was still a work in progress. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
