Since modifying the code to handle storing Bayes in MySql seems like a
more long term project, is there any immediate way to support sharing
the Bayes DB over NFS with proper file locking ?
adam
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 12:12, Joe Breu wrote:
> > > Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery hos
> > Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery host instead of the MX
> > hosts? (I'm assume that both of your MX servers must forward the mail to a
> > central server.)
> Your suggestion is the exact opposite of the intended function. The idea
> is to run two relays to share the load, or r
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:12 PM -0700 Kelsey Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:25:49AM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> I have seen this pop up before but with no real answer. If you have 2
> relay
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:25:49AM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > I have seen this pop up before but with no real answer. If you have 2
> > relay servers with equal MX costs sitting on the perimiter running SA,
> > how do you hav
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> I have seen this pop up before but with no real answer. If you have 2
> relay servers with equal MX costs sitting on the perimiter running SA,
> how do you have it so they both share and update an "in-sync" db so that
> both relay s
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:07:42AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> The issue is sharing one Bayes DB between multiple relays.. how do you
> do it?
Rewriting SA to place the Bayes stuff in a SQL DB instead of the DBM format
it currently uses would be a start - then you could have all your user AND
