On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 01:50:33PM -0700, Kevin Gagel wrote:
> Here is a random sampling from my server. One of the highest ones I saw in
> skimming over two days worth was 47 seconds and one of the lowest I saw was 12
> seconds.
Yeah, it's the basic definition of "distributed system" (when a sys
Kevin Gagel wrote:
>
> Here is a random sampling from my server. One of the highest ones I saw in
> skimming over two days worth was 47 seconds and one of the lowest I saw was 12
> seconds.
> > > What I want to be able to say is something like "a Pentium IV with 512Mb of RAM
>and
> > > a SCSI d
Hi,
AMD 1.2 Ghz with 256 meg ram
Approx 200K messages a day
No network tests except a local DCC server
Average time is 1.13 seconds, probably due to the odd spam that times out on
the MX lookup which I've changed to a default of 2 instead of 3.
I'm not running without Network tests, I just set
begin quote from Kevin Gagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> written 2002-09-24:
Here's a sampling from my logs:
13:10:53 filter1 spamd[29471]: clean message (0/8) for (unknown):100 in 0
seconds.
Sep 3 13:10:59 filter1 spamd[29472]: clean message (0/8) for (unknown):100 in
0 seconds.
Sep 3 13:11:10 fil
Quoting Mariano Absatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does anyone have hard data about msgs/sec SA performance? I'd like to know
> what
> hardware/software you use (cpu, ram, hd type/size/speed, os, smtp server
> soft,
> anything else you find relevant).
I'm running SA on RedHat 7.3 with ext3 using th
Here is a random sampling from my server. One of the highest ones I saw in
skimming over two days worth was 47 seconds and one of the lowest I saw was 12
seconds.
Sep 24 10:30:03 spam spamd[9868]: clean message (1.9/5.0) for root:99 in 27
seconds, 4310 bytes.
Sep 24 10:30:24 spam spamd[9885]: cl
> "KG" == Kevin Gagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KG> From this message I see that processing should be around 10
KG> seconds or less on a average email if you are using Razor with
KG> SA. I am using razor and my average seems to be around 20 - 30
KG> seconds for each message. So I would like
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Gagel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 September 2002 17:47
> To: SpamAssassin-Talk list
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA performance info
>
>
> Sorry everyone I missed the original...
> From this message I see that pro
Sorry everyone I missed the original...
>From this message I see that processing should be around 10 seconds or less on a
average email if you are using Razor with SA. I am using razor and my average
seems to be around 20 - 30 seconds for each message. So I would like to know if
there is something
El 24 Sep 2002 a las 10:29, Vivek Khera escribió:
> > "MA" == Mariano Absatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MA> I know this is definitively a muddy item, but I have to come
> MA> through it... We are planning to integrate SA into a border smtp
> MA> gateway to process, tag and accept all mai
> "MA" == Mariano Absatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MA> I know this is definitively a muddy item, but I have to come
MA> through it... We are planning to integrate SA into a border smtp
MA> gateway to process, tag and accept all mail coming from the
MA> Internet for a large ISP.
For a "larg
Hi,
I know this is definitively a muddy item, but I have to come through it... We are
planning to integrate SA into a border smtp gateway to process, tag and accept all
mail coming from the Internet for a large ISP.
We'll probably scan the mail server input queue with several processeses and c
12 matches
Mail list logo
