Here is a random sampling from my server. One of the highest ones I saw in skimming over two days worth was 47 seconds and one of the lowest I saw was 12 seconds. Sep 24 10:30:03 spam spamd[9868]: clean message (1.9/5.0) for root:99 in 27 seconds, 4310 bytes. Sep 24 10:30:24 spam spamd[9885]: clean message (4.5/5.0) for root:99 in 24 seconds, 479 bytes. Sep 24 10:31:10 spam spamd[9893]: clean message (3.4/5.0) for root:99 in 26 seconds, 4868 bytes. Sep 24 10:31:16 spam spamd[9899]: clean message (4.8/5.0) for root:99 in 21 seconds, 26161 bytes. Sep 24 10:31:23 spam spamd[9905]: clean message (2.6/5.0) for root:99 in 25 seconds, 62680 bytes. Sep 24 10:31:28 spam spamd[9915]: identified spam (19.2/5.0) for root:99 in 26 seconds, 1939 bytes. Sep 24 10:31:30 spam spamd[9917]: identified spam (15.6/5.0) for root:99 in 28 seconds, 1353 bytes. Sep 24 10:32:02 spam spamd[9978]: clean message (-0.5/5.0) for root:99 in 22 seconds, 4047 bytes. Sep 24 10:32:12 spam spamd[9984]: clean message (0.2/5.0) for root:99 in 25 seconds, 1470 bytes. Sep 24 10:32:19 spam spamd[9990]: identified spam (7.1/5.0) for root:99 in 26 seconds, 1754 bytes. Sep 24 10:32:52 spam spamd[9999]: identified spam (34.5/5.0) for root:99 in 25 seconds, 2116 bytes. Sep 24 10:32:53 spam spamd[10005]: identified spam (11.5/5.0) for root:99 in 26 seconds, 5274 bytes. Sep 24 10:33:00 spam spamd[10011]: identified spam (15.8/5.0) for root:99 in 27 seconds, 25666 bytes. Sep 24 10:33:15 spam spamd[10017]: clean message (-2.8/5.0) for root:99 in 25 seconds, 2909 bytes. Sep 24 10:33:21 spam spamd[10025]: clean message (-0.2/5.0) for root:99 in 26 seconds, 3942 bytes. Sep 24 10:33:25 spam spamd[10032]: identified spam (15.8/5.0) for root:99 in 25 seconds, 25670 bytes. Sep 24 10:33:35 spam spamd[10038]: identified spam (8.7/5.0) for root:99 in 22 seconds, 45975 bytes. Sep 24 10:33:54 spam spamd[10047]: identified spam (15.8/5.0) for root:99 in 29 seconds, 25667 bytes. Sep 24 10:34:00 spam spamd[10054]: identified spam (13.4/5.0) for root:99 in 24 seconds, 4600 bytes. Sep 24 10:34:05 spam spamd[10060]: clean message (-4.0/5.0) for root:99 in 26 seconds, 17417 bytes. Sep 24 10:34:15 spam spamd[10072]: identified spam (9.9/5.0) for root:99 in 26 seconds, 5867 bytes. Sep 24 10:34:16 spam spamd[10066]: clean message (2.9/5.0) for root:99 in 29 seconds, 4115 bytes. Sep 24 10:34:22 spam spamd[10079]: identified spam (15.8/5.0) for root:99 in 28 seconds, 25666 bytes. Sep 24 10:34:33 spam spamd[10087]: identified spam (13.8/5.0) for root:99 in 27 seconds, 4652 bytes.
Kevin Gagel wrote: > > Sorry everyone I missed the original... > >From this message I see that processing should be around 10 seconds or less on a > average email if you are using Razor with SA. I am using razor and my average > seems to be around 20 - 30 seconds for each message. So I would like to know if > there is something that I can check to see what the problem might be, any ideas? > > Mariano Absatz wrote: > > > > El 24 Sep 2002 a las 10:29, Vivek Khera escribió: > > > > > >>>>> "MA" == Mariano Absatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > MA> I know this is definitively a muddy item, but I have to come > > > MA> through it... We are planning to integrate SA into a border smtp > > > MA> gateway to process, tag and accept all mail coming from the > > > MA> Internet for a large ISP. > > > > > > For a "large ISP" you'll need a "large computer". You need to be more > > I know that... it'll probably be a bunch of intel or sparc machines with ample ram > > and fast scsi disks... > > > > > specific on how much email you intend to process, how bursty that > > > traffic is (ie, is it pretty much consistent or does a big amount come > > > in at any specific time.) > > What I want to be able to say is something like "a Pentium IV with 512Mb of RAM and > > a SCSI drive will be able to deliver 2 or 3 messages per second on average" and >then > > decide if I need 2, 3 or 10 of this machines for the job... > > > > > > > > In any case, for my inbound mail, I have SA running as a content > > > filter via amavisd-new (so it is always there waiting to process > > > mail), and I don't do the RBL checks since my mail server does those > > > by itself. A typical message will take anywhere from 200 to 10000 ms > > > to process, depending on how long Razor takes to respond. Without > > > Razor, it would almost never go above 300ms per message. > > > > This is good info for me... this times are for SA processing (no AV) are they?... >on > > what kind of hardware? > > > > Thanx a lot for the info. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > -- > ======================== > Kevin W. Gagel > Network Administrator > College of New Caledonia > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (250)562-2131 loc. 448 > ======================== > > -------------------------------- > The College of New Caledonia > Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca > -------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- ======================== Kevin W. Gagel Network Administrator College of New Caledonia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (250)562-2131 loc. 448 ======================== -------------------------------- The College of New Caledonia Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca -------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
