On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Greg Ward wrote:
> On 04 March 2002, Matt Sergeant said:
> > "Dear matt"
>
> But your local part is "msergeant", I just checked! How much real mail
> do you get that says "Dear msergeant"?
That's work email (where I don't care about spam that much) - home is
matt @ sergeant.
>Doesn't work for me, sorry... I actually see the presence of "dear ..."
>where "..." isn't sir or madam or any other generic term as a sign that
>it's likely not spam. For certain most spammers aren't going to want to
>send emails having: "Dear 42fudge82323" where the recipient is
>[EMAIL PROTECT
The one I see a lot that gives me the Publisher's
Clearing House customized warm fuzzy is a customized
subject. I've never seen a customized dear that I can
remember. I see a lot of subjects like:
Hello, kerry_nice, get your free porn here
I wouldn't be sure how to write something like that,
ma
On 04 March 2002, Matt Sergeant said:
> "Dear matt"
But your local part is "msergeant", I just checked! How much real mail
do you get that says "Dear msergeant"?
> Doesn't work for me, sorry... I actually see the presence of "dear ..."
> where "..." isn't sir or madam or any other generic term
Eval tests are your friend. You can call get("To:addr") in there --
search the existing code for examples.
C
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 08:16, Greg Ward wrote:
> /^dear\s+$local_part/i
>
> ought to be worth a point or so. But I don't see a good way to do
> *that* with a regex. That sort of thin
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Greg Ward wrote:
> On 01 March 2002, Nels Lindquist said:
> > One caveat.
> >
> > E-mail of the form [ "Your Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] is legal.
> >
> > E-mail of the form [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Your Name) ] is also legal.
> >
> > Not knowing much about regexp, I'm not sure if
On 01 March 2002, Nels Lindquist said:
> One caveat.
>
> E-mail of the form [ "Your Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] is legal.
>
> E-mail of the form [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Your Name) ] is also legal.
>
> Not knowing much about regexp, I'm not sure if your proposed
> expression handles the second cas
On 28 Feb 2002 at 16:44, Greg Ward wrote:
> [I suggest a new rule]
> > Here's a quick and dirty attempt:
> >
> > header TO_REALNAME_EQ_LOCALPARTTo =~ /\"?(\w+)\"?\s+<\1\@[^<>]+>/i
> > describe TO_REALNAME_EQ_LOCALPART Real name in "To:" equals local part
> > score TO_REALNAME_EQ_LOCALPART
From: Greg Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Craig Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Rule idea: "real name" == local part
>
> On 28 February 2002, Craig Hughes said:
> > Greg, I think I'm going to be busy for a fe
On 28 February 2002, Craig Hughes said:
> Greg, I think I'm going to be busy for a few days just with scoring
> refinements. If you could solidify the regex I'd appreciate it.
OK, here's a patch relative to CVS:
--- rules/20_head_tests.cf 26 Feb 2002 12:04:21 - 1.33
+++ rules/20_h
On 2/28/02 1:44 PM, "Greg Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [I suggest a new rule]
>> Here's a quick and dirty attempt:
>>
>> header TO_REALNAME_EQ_LOCALPARTTo =~ /\"?(\w+)\"?\s+<\1\@[^<>]+>/i
>> describe TO_REALNAME_EQ_LOCALPART Real name in "To:" equals local part
>> score TO_REALNAME_EQ
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 13:22, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Sounds like a good rule -- even people like me who use
> their name as email address probably won't have many
> people using "Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; if
> they're going to go to the trouble of setting
> the real name, they'll now what my last
[I suggest a new rule]
> Here's a quick and dirty attempt:
>
> header TO_REALNAME_EQ_LOCALPARTTo =~ /\"?(\w+)\"?\s+<\1\@[^<>]+>/i
> describe TO_REALNAME_EQ_LOCALPART Real name in "To:" equals local part
> score TO_REALNAME_EQ_LOCALPART 2.5
[Craig responds]
> Sounds like a good rule -- e
Sounds like a good rule -- even people like me who use their name as email
address probably won't have many people using "Craig"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; if they're going to go to the trouble of setting
the real name, they'll now what my last name is.
C
On 2/28/02 7:08 AM, "Greg Ward" <[EMAIL PROTE
On 28 February 2002, dman said:
> My "real name" == my "local part". Well, not in this example since I
> still have my school's address in the header, but if I use my system's
> address, the From: line will be
> From: dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and people who stick that directly in their addr
Does SA already have a rule for headers like this:
To: gward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
? If not, I think it should -- this seems a fairly popular tactic.
The one I got this morning looked like this:
To: "Gward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...so any such rule should be case-insensitive and handle RFC 8
16 matches
Mail list logo
