On January 09, 2004 04:50 pm, Alan Munday wrote:
> Is anyone finding pyzor reporting a bit hit and miss?
>
> Reporting using:
>
> $ formail -s spamassassin -r < /var/spool/mail/spamtrap
>
> Gave a pyzor error for each of the messages:
>
> Pyzor -> report failed: Exited with non-zero exit code 1
>
>
Is anyone finding pyzor reporting a bit hit and miss?
Reporting using:
$ formail -s spamassassin -r < /var/spool/mail/spamtrap
Gave a pyzor error for each of the messages:
Pyzor -> report failed: Exited with non-zero exit code 1
Running:
Pyzor report --mbox < /var/spool/mail/spamtrap
Came b
I just noticed this on my system:
root 4958 0.0 0.8 27088 8764 ?S 2003 0:06 /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a
-m5 -H
nbecker 29745 3.2 1.5 27888 15572 ? S15:34 0:00 \_ /usr/bin/spamd -d -c
-a -m5 -H
root 29749 0.0 0.1 6204 1084 ?S15:34 0:00 \_ s
cember 2003 19:29
To: Alan Munday; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Pyzor
Alan:
Do you find any value running Pyzor? I gave up on it long ago, as it never
seemed to hit on any quantity of Spam.
BTW: I normally test things by doing a sp
ber 16, 2003 5:22 AM
| To: 'Martin, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Pyzor
|
| Martin
|
| Thanks... Found it.
|
| I'm calling spamassassin from a script file driving anomy
| (from the Advosys postfix/spamassassin/anomy howto)
|
| That was using -L which I'
Running spamassassin rather than spamd at the moment.
Enabled with use_pyzor 1 in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MIKE
YRABEDRA
Sent: 16 December 2003 10:47
To: SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: Re: [SAtalk
in,
Jeremy
Sent: 16 December 2003 11:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Pyzor
I don't see a -t in "man spamd" with SA 2.61. -L enables local tests only -
the manpage says it disables DNS tests only but it also seems to
on 12/16/03 5:59 AM, Martin, Jeremy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't see a -t in "man spamd" with SA 2.61. -L enables local tests only -
> the manpage says it disables DNS tests only but it also seems to disable
> Pyzor/Razor2/etc.
Yes, you right, it's too early here ;-)
Just make sure you
Running spamassassin rather than spamd at the moment.
Enabled with use_pyzor 1 in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MIKE
YRABEDRA
Sent: 16 December 2003 10:47
To: SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: Re: [SAtalk
I don't see a -t in "man spamd" with SA 2.61. -L enables local tests only - the
manpage says it disables DNS tests only but it also seems to disable Pyzor/Razor2/etc.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert
on 12/16/03 5:36 AM, Alan Munday at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I installed Pyzor last night (0.4.0 on SA 2.60)
>
> All seems well. I can run it from the command line, have done the discover
> and checked with Spamassassin -D (as root and the mail user) which detected
> pyzor and reported the mail
I installed Pyzor last night (0.4.0 on SA 2.60)
All seems well. I can run it from the command line, have done the discover
and checked with Spamassassin -D (as root and the mail user) which detected
pyzor and reported the mail.
So... This morning I'm browsing through a few hundred of the overnig
At 01:38 20/11/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Has anyone else problems with Pyzor? I am getting these, all throughout the
day,
Pyzor: couldn't grok response "66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError: "
I did a "/usr/local/bin/pyzor discover", but to no avail. And I do not have
them blocked on the firewall either.
Has anyone else problems with Pyzor? I am getting these, all throughout the
day,
Pyzor: couldn't grok response "66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError: "
I did a "/usr/local/bin/pyzor discover", but to no avail. And I do not have
them blocked on the firewall either.
Thanks,
- Mark
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Geordon VanTassle wrote:
> Hello spamassassin-talk,
>
> I'm moderately new to SA, and completely new to Pyzor and DCC.
> I've installed Py and DCC per the instructions (I think. Not getting any
> errors, anyway) and I have set SA to add DCC and Pyzor headers, but I'm
>
Hello spamassassin-talk,
I'm moderately new to SA, and completely new to Pyzor and DCC. I've installed
Py and DCC per the instructions (I think. Not getting any errors, anyway) and I have
set SA to add DCC and Pyzor headers, but I'm not seeing them in my mail.
Where can I start looki
I am getting an error saying pyzor is not found:
Oct 1 09:46:55 altair spamd[7110]: debug: Pyzor is not available: pyzor not
found
I installed pyzor and it is in the path, but for some reason it cant find
it. I had the same issue on my home box, but I just installed pyzor and it
was fixed. I am
Since upgrading to 2.60, I don't see that Pyzor is being used anymore.. yet
I don't see any reference saying that it is no longer supported.. has
anybody else noticed this, or can anybody clue me in as to what happened or
might be happening?
Thanks!!
I've been using Pyzor for awhile now, but I can't remember ever getting
a hit from it. So just for grins and sh$ts I ran spamassassin -tD <
testspam.txt and got the following:
debug: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: entering helper-
> -Original Message-
> how sucessfull is pyzor in detecting spam? Any experiences?
> I'm alread
> using razor, which works quite nice. Would I get better results using
> pyzor instead or should I use a combination of both?
I've been using SA w/Pyzor for about 2 months now with ~600 or s
Hi Marcus,
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Schopen
> how sucessfull is pyzor in detecting spam? Any experiences?
> I'm alread using razor, which works quite nice. Would I get better
> results using pyzor instead or should I use a combination of both?
I can't remember who, but I beli
Hi,
how sucessfull is pyzor in detecting spam? Any experiences? I'm alread
using razor, which works quite nice. Would I get better results using
pyzor instead or should I use a combination of both?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
Marcus Schopen(0>
P.O. Box 10 25 25 //\ Deutsche Zope User Grou
I must be doing something stupid, or have something misconfigured. My
server times out on Pyzor tests about 90% of the time, and on DCC tests
about 5-10% of the time. I've set the timeouts to 10 seconds. My
average message analysis time due to these tests taking so long is 13-15
seconds. It was
I know this has probably been dealt with before, but I don't seem able
to find it. Sorry for drudging up old questions.
I just set up pyzor, and modified my reporting keystroke to use
spamassassin -r, but I'm getting this error:
Pyzor -> report failed: Received error code 256 at
/usr/local/lib/p
I finally got around to installing pyzor. I can do a pyzor ping or
discover so it seems to be working. However, I haven't seen any sign that
spamassassin is using it.
I've run the sample-spam.txt through spamassassin and see dcc and razor2
checks but no mention of pyzor.
Did I need to do any
Hi,
I had a similar problem when I installed pyzor.
In my case, I am running spamd with a spamd user with its $HOME dir set
to /var/lib/spamassassin.
The only way to solve this was to set -H /var/lib/spamassassin/ in the
line I call spamd in my initscript.
I think that the cause of this is that s
Hello again!
If someone has expirience with Pyzor, please help me to solve my problem.
When I start "spamassassin -D < spam.txt", I got following strings in the
output:
[...]
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/local/python/bin/pyzor
debug: entering helper-app run mode
debug: Pyzor: got response: Tr
Hello.
I'm trying to run pyzor with SA on my system but I have problem and I
don't know how to solve it solve it :(
When I start "spamassassin -D < spam.txt", I got following strings in the
output:
[...]
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/local/python/bin/pyzor
debug: entering helper-app run mode
d
- Original Message -
From: "mikea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SA List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Pyzor not working?
> It appears to me (I could be wrong) that SA is trying to check the
> mail a
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:13:03AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Hi, what mean this?
> This is the output from "spamassassin -lint -D < sample-spam.txt"
>
>
> debug: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
> debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
> debug: entering helper-app run mode
> de
Hi, what mean this?
This is the output from "spamassassin -lint -D < sample-spam.txt"
debug: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: entering helper-app run mode
debug: leaving helper-app run mode
Pyzor -> check failed: no response
The h
Hi, what mean this?
This is the output from "spamassassin -lint -D < sample-spam.txt"
debug: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: entering helper-app run mode
debug: leaving helper-app run mode
Pyzor -> check failed: no response
The h
Hi,
Just installed pyzor to work with spamd.
pyzor works fine in the command line (as root and as spamd user).
However spamd (sa-2.55) seems to not be able to use pyzor.
I get this logs:
8<---
Jul 22 11:22:25 s spamd[6209]: debu
Running spamassassin 2.55 via spamd with an sql database with this command
spamd -i 0.0.0.0 -a -A 192.168.0.0/24,127.0.0.1 -u spamassassin -d -x -q -r
/var/run/spamd.pid
When I run it in debug mode I get this error
spamd[18246]: debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/local/pyzor
spamd[18246]: debug:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After having successfully integrated spamassassin via procmail to my
home based mailserver i've started corresponding with my parents'
university, regarding filtering in their facilities.
In my dad's department there's a SunOS mailserver, which does t
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=360
pyzor package for Red Hat, cleaned up a bit. I would appreciate any
suggestions for improving this package further.
Has anyone made a package of dccproc for Red Hat that builds cleanly as
a non-root user?
Warren Togami
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:10:48PM -0800, Mark Miksis wrote:
> I've seen this asked a few times, but haven't found an answer that works
> for me. spamassassin -D says:
It's a bug (#1559 actually): http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1559
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"There's
Greetings all,
I was playing with pyzor again. It's giving me some errors that
aren't listed anywhere in Google that I can find, nor the pyzor users
mailing list.
Here's a snip from the spamd debug output:
Jan 8 23:19:36 mail spamd[4084]: debug: Razor1 is not available
Jan 8 23:19:36 mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I keep getting this error when spamd invokes pyzor:
Pyzor: couldn't grok response "Traceback (most recent call last)
How can I fix this?
...
Randomly Generated Quote:
Any fool can paint a picture, but it
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:44:46AM -0500, Smart, Dan wrote:
> Great suggestion. Not sure why my paths went haywire, but I added:
> |> debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
> |> debug: Pyzor is not available: pyzor not found
> |>
> |> What could have happened? I didn't mess with either p
> "IA" == Ives Aerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IA> After upgrading to 2.42, I get a lot less (actually none so far) false
IA> positives but I do get more false negatives. To do something about
IA> that, I thought of adding pyzor, dcc or razor2 to my installation. Any
IA> suggestions as to wh
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:39:35PM +0200, Ives Aerts wrote:
> After upgrading to 2.42, I get a lot less (actually none so far) false
> positives but I do get more false negatives. To do something about
> that, I thought of adding pyzor, dcc or razor2 to my installation. Any
> suggestions as to whic
After upgrading to 2.42, I get a lot less (actually none so far) false
positives but I do get more false negatives. To do something about
that, I thought of adding pyzor, dcc or razor2 to my installation. Any
suggestions as to which one to use? Stability and effectivity are my
main concerns.
Cheer
Dinter [mailto:felicity@;kluge.net]
|Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:32 PM
|To: Smart, Dan
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Pyzor & DCC not found
|
|
|On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Smart, Dan wrote:
|> debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
|> debug: Pyzor is not avai
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Smart, Dan wrote:
> debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
> debug: Pyzor is not available: pyzor not found
>
> What could have happened? I didn't mess with either pyzor or dcc today. I
> did load the 2.20 Razor, which is working great! Could t
Classification: PUBLIC
I tried back revving to Razor 2.14. This didn't make a difference.
Not sure what to do next.
<>
|-Original Message-
|From: Smart, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:00 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [SAtalk]
Classification: PUBLIC
I'm running the release 2.43 code.
I had Razor2, DCC, and Pyzor all running under 2.42 and 2.43.
Now, all of a sudden, DCC and Pyzor have quit running.
When I loaded spamd from command prompt it says:
> spamd -D -x -a -m 8 -u filter -H /home/filter
debug: DCC is not ava
t, Dan
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Pyzor not loading
|
|
|On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Dan Smart said:
|> ImportError: No module named distutils.core
|>
|> I've loaded a current copy of python 2 (Python 1 is still loaded)
|>
|> [root@lewis pyzor-0.4.0]# rpm -q python2
|
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Dan Smart said:
> ImportError: No module named distutils.core
>
> I've loaded a current copy of python 2 (Python 1 is still loaded)
>
> [root@lewis pyzor-0.4.0]# rpm -q python2
> python2-2.2.1-1
> [root@lewis pyzor-0.4.0]# rpm -q python2-tools
> python2-tools-2.2.1-1
> [root@
I'm trying to load Pyzor. I get an error:
[root@lewis pyzor-0.4.0]# python setup.py build
Traceback (innermost last):
File "setup.py", line 2, in ?
import distutils.core
ImportError: No module named distutils.core
I've loaded a current copy of python 2 (Python 1 is still loaded)
[root@le
50 matches
Mail list logo
