RE: [SAtalk] New User question

2003-10-17 Thread Michael Balamuth
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:55 AM To: 'Michael Balamuth' Subject: RE: [SAtalk] New User question In qmail-scanner.pl remove th -c from the spamassassin binary line -Original Message- From: Michael Balamuth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October

RE: [SAtalk] New User question

2003-10-17 Thread Michael Balamuth
anyone would like to see, but again, don't want to clutter up too much at once. Michael Balamuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick Morris Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 4:32 PM To: Michael Balamuth Cc: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [SAtalk] New User question

2003-10-16 Thread Patrick Morris
How are you calling SpamAssassin? If you're running it via some sort of helper app like Amavis or MIMEdefang, it may be stripping the headers normally added by SpamAssassin. Michael Balamuth wrote: Further info. Upon reviewing the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf documentation, I noticed that one hea

RE: [SAtalk] New User question

2003-10-16 Thread Michael Balamuth
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:05 PM To: Michael Balamuth; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New User question At 11:15 AM 10/16/2003, Michael Balamuth wrote: >Being very new to spamassassin, I hope these aren't too dumb questions. >Having configured /etc/mail/spa

RE: [SAtalk] New User question

2003-10-16 Thread Michael Balamuth
m: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:05 PM To: Michael Balamuth; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New User question At 11:15 AM 10/16/2003, Michael Balamuth wrote: >Being very new to spamassassin, I hope these aren't too dumb questions. >H

Re: [SAtalk] New User question

2003-10-16 Thread Matt Kettler
At 11:15 AM 10/16/2003, Michael Balamuth wrote: Being very new to spamassassin, I hope these aren't too dumb questions. Having configured /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf as inserted below, I'd suggest running spamassassin --lint. There are errors in your local.cf.. in particular, defang_mime is no

[SAtalk] New User question

2003-10-16 Thread Michael Balamuth
Hello List, Being very new to spamassassin, I hope these aren't too dumb questions. Having configured /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf as inserted below, I do get the appropriate inserted header information (such as X-Spam-Status: Yes and scores), but no re-writing whatsoever of the email body or s

Re: [SAtalk] new user question

2002-06-07 Thread David T-G
Bill -- ...and then William Schwartz said... % % I'm pretty new to spam-assassin. Currently I'm using the default setup and Welcome! % procmail to flag my spam and it's been working really well. Good. % % I"d like to figure out how to use some of the options like blacklist_to % whitelist

[SAtalk] new user question

2002-06-07 Thread William Schwartz
I'm pretty new to spam-assassin. Currently I'm using the default setup and procmail to flag my spam and it's been working really well. I"d like to figure out how to use some of the options like blacklist_to whitelist_to, etc... on a per user basis. I have the default /etc/mail/spamassassin/lo

Re: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

2002-05-30 Thread Lars Hansson
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 23:20, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > razor.conf isn't necessary. I believe you can put in razor whitelist > stuff in there, but... I just let SA handle that stuff and leave razor > in the default state myself. Actually, if you're not running spamd as root and you want to use

RE: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

2002-05-29 Thread Jon Paterson
k out the code... Jon -Original Message- From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 16:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor. >>>>> "JP" == Jon Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JP> I (per

RE: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

2002-05-29 Thread Vivek Khera
> "JP" == Jon Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JP> I (perhaps wrongly) believed that spamd would also pass the mail to JP> razor as it was passed through. I if I run razor-check with the Nothing with SA (the module, not the spamassassin program) nor razor requires a home directory for t

RE: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

2002-05-29 Thread Jon Paterson
boxes?) Regards, Jon -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 16:20 To: Jon Paterson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor. On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:05:27PM +0100, Jon Paterson wrote: > Although

Re: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

2002-05-29 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:05:27PM +0100, Jon Paterson wrote: > Although spamd is catching stuff, I have not seen any indications that > anything is actually going through razor. Is there anyway that I can > check? I have also noticed that I do not have the razor.conf file You can pipe the spam

[SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

2002-05-29 Thread Jon Paterson
Title: New user question regarding razor. Hi, I have got 2.20 working, and have installed razor-client, and the sdk to get the perl modules, all OK. When running the spamd in debug, I can see the it finds razor, and reads the nearest razor server. Although spamd is catching stuff, I have