RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

Hey Chris, > -Original Message- > From: Chris Santerre > See why I don't need bayes or net tests ;) I catch 99% of > spam. I've had a breakthru today that should catch the ones > that have been sneaking in. (Matt and JMason, the doc I sent > you guys has a pattern in the Message-ID he

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

> -Original Message- > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:24 AM > To: 'Chris Santerre'; spamassassin_list > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd > > > Hi Chris, > > > -Original Messag

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

Hi Chris, > -Original Message- > From: Chris Santerre > Nope, sorry. Didn't catch that. THey are run from seperate cf > files in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir. They are run for the > entire company! Every bit of email that enters company is > subject to all of these rules. Matt's rul

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

> -Original Message- > From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:48 AM > To: spamassassin_list > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd > > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > > > > -Ori

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM > > > > Do you have a feel for the number of rules that would need to be > > in user_prefs to have a significant impact on perform

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

> -Original Message- > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:08 AM > To: 'Chris Santerre'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd > > > > > >

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

Hi Tom, You can find it here: http://www.wot.no-ip.com/show.me/Projects/Blocklist/ --Larry > -Original Message- > From: Tom Meunier > A google of [reg2rule] and [reg2rule.pl] brings up nada. > Throw me a bone? --- This SF.net

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Santerre > I'm not sure about performance loss. I have every rule (That isn't a > duplicate) in the SA rule emporeum running now. Plus all the > evil domains generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I > haven't put on the Emporeum yet. I say I h

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

Thanks Matt! Points well taken. As I only use SA on a gateway with very limited access, I have not been too worried about the potential spamd exploit. However, user_prefs is not my first choice. In fact, I would rather use local.cf with spamd. I just don't like the idea of restarting spamd eve

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

, 2003 8:12 AM > To: 'Larry Gilson'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd > [ ] > evil domains > generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I haven't put on the [ ] -

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

> -Original Message- > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM > To: 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd > > > Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too igno

Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

At 8/25/03 09:05 PM , Larry Gilson wrote: I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal? Yes, this is normal. I understand v.2.60 can be given a HUP signal, like

Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

At 00:05 26/08/2003 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote: I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal? Yep. Regards, Simon

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too ignorant . . . Do you have a feel for the number of rules that would need to be in user_prefs to have a significant impact on performance relative to spamd with everything else being equal? I am just looking for a rough guess. I could imagine that the

Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

At 12:05 AM 8/26/03 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote: I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal? Yes, local.cf and all of the /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf files are

[SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd

I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal? Regards, Larry --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM W