- Original Message -
From: "Vivek Khera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please
> >>>>> "AL" == Alan Leghart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AL&g
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64
> L> encoding).
> >> How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich
> >> text, but it is sent clear.
>
> L> You
> "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64
L> encoding).
>> How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich
>> text, but it is sent clear.
L> You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way
>L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64
>L> encoding).
>How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich
>text, but it is sent clear.
You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way Apple Mail does
;-)
--
> "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64
L> encoding).
How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich
text, but it is sent clear.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
< > They could be using pound signs, and the MUA in question is deciding
that
< > that needs base64 encoding (obviously not the right thing to do, but
< > there you go.) Any idea what the MUA was?
< >
<
< Lotus I-Notes is what they said when I spoke to them on the phone. I
< don't know anything
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:40, Justin Mason wrote:
> Ron McKeating said:
>
> > Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> > ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
> > awarded
> >
> > HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to
- Original Message -
From: "Ron McKeating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Advice Please
> Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> ordinary text. And why does i
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 13:26, Alan Leghart wrote:
> --On Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:18 PM +0100 Ron McKeating
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> > ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
> > awarded
> "AL" == Alan Leghart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AL> to use different encoding (although, IIRC, it's not base-64 by
AL> default). I tested on one machine on our LAN, and from inside
AL> Excel 2000, select File and Send as email. Voici, base-64 encoded
AL> when it goes out. I'm glad I didn
Ron McKeating said:
> Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
> awarded
>
> HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
> HTML_MESSAGE (1.1 points) BODY: HTML includ
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:18 PM +0100 Ron McKeating
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
Quoting Ron McKeating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
> awarded
[...]
> This really was an innocent user from a local council. What on earth
> could they have set on
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
HTML_MESSAGE (1.1 points) BODY: HTML included in message
BASE64_ENC_TEXT(
14 matches
Mail list logo
