Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:08, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
>>you're probably already using procmail for spamassassin,
>>so add in the rule (it's in the procmail man page) that
>>unduplicates your messages based on message-id.
>>
>
>That doesn't help people he sends to who migh
On 2/28/02 12:33 PM, "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK only mutt and gnus have any sort of support for (or concept of)
> mailing lists.
Actually, Entourage (Outlook for MacOS X) also knows a lot about lists, but
doesn't seem to have a reply-to-list button. It does have all kinds of
sup
On 28 February 2002, Rob McMillin said:
> My MUA is *not* broken. Reply-To makes it so I can reply to just the
> list. If I use the group function, the original sender gets two copies.
> I find it a convenience, and many lists I'm subscribed to use this feature.
Your MUA should have a "list rep
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:49:36AM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote:
| Nigel Metheringham wrote:
|
| >Translation:
| > Your MUA is broken and you wish the list config to be
| > broken to make it easier for you to manage.
|
| I object to the snarky tone of your reply. It's unnecessary.
|
| My MUA is *no
If nothing else, it's easier to remove a name from a list of addresses
than have to manually type in the guy's e-mail address.
Please not to change good thing
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/list
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:08, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> you're probably already using procmail for spamassassin,
> so add in the rule (it's in the procmail man page) that
> unduplicates your messages based on message-id.
That doesn't help people he sends to who might not have that, but your
suggest
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:49:36AM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote:
> My MUA is *not* broken. Reply-To makes it so I can reply to just the
> list. If I use the group function, the original sender gets two copies.
> I find it a convenience, and many lists I'm subscribed to use this feature.
This is a
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>Translation:
> Your MUA is broken and you wish the list config to be
> broken to make it easier for you to manage.
>
I object to the snarky tone of your reply. It's unnecessary.
My MUA is *not* broken. Reply-To makes it so I can reply to just the
list. If I use the
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 16:59, Rob McMillin wrote:
> I haven't been here long (less than 24 hours!), but I have a suggestion:
> is it possible to set the list so it auto-inserts a "Reply-To:" the list
> header, as
>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ? It seems it would be useful.
Translation:
