On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:49:36AM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote: > My MUA is *not* broken. Reply-To makes it so I can reply to just the > list. If I use the group function, the original sender gets two copies. > I find it a convenience, and many lists I'm subscribed to use this feature.
This is a standard argument that occurs on mailing lists. If the Reply-To is set, it makes it really difficult to respond to only the sender of the message, and people complain. If the Reply-To isn't set, responses may only goto the sender and not the list, and people complain. I'm of the opinion that the Reply-To should be left blank and leave it up to the MUA/user to figure out the "reply to group" bit. I'd rather have the "incorrect action" to impact only 1 person receiving mail (ie: the response only goes to sender) rather than the "incorrect action" impact everyone on the mailing list. As for the duplicate messages to sender business, you're probably already using procmail for spamassassin, so add in the rule (it's in the procmail man page) that unduplicates your messages based on message-id. It's worked great for me for years. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Blizzard is not responsible for the death and loss of your hardcore characters for any reason including Internet lag, bugs, Acts of God, your little sister, or any other reason whatsoever. [...] Blizzard will not, and does not have the capability to restore any deceased Hardcore characters. Don't even ask. La-la-la-la-la, we can't hear you ..." - Diablo II Manual _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
