Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:08, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
>>you're probably already using procmail for spamassassin,
>>so add in the rule (it's in the procmail man page) that
>>unduplicates your messages based on message-id.
>>
>
>That doesn't help people he sends to who might not have that, but your
>suggestion does give me an idea.
>
>Anyone who is already using procmail who prefers to reply to the list by
>default can easily add a recipe for each mailing list they receive which
>rewrites a Reply-To as X-Reply-To and writes a new Reply-To with the
>group address. That not only would make them happy and function as a
>whitelist, but it works better than the list administrator setting
>Reply-To the group because it preserves the correct address to reply to
>the author. Because setting group Reply-To overwrites any Reply-To
>header set by a message's author, there is no way for a procmail recipe
>to compensate in the other direction.
>
Yes, in fact this is what I plan on doing. Thanks for your suggestion.
--
http://www.pricegrabber.com | Dog is my co-pilot.
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
