Joao Reis,
| Dec 22 10:04:50 socrates amavis[12387]: (12387-04) SA TIMED OUT,
| backtrace: at
| /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
| 1489\n\teval {...} called at
| /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
| 1489\n\tMail::SpamAssas
Stephen,
| RH9, amavisd-new (p6), spamassassin 2.6 :
|
| I believe the config path that spamassassin is using is
| /usr/share/spamassassin.
| However, I want it to use my chrooted amavis directory of
| /var/amavisd/usr/share/spamassassin.
|
| How and where can I change this ?
You need to change
Per,
| I'm having trouble with a newly installed server.
| OpenBSD 3.4 GENERIC#0 i386
| amavisd-new latest stable
| amavisd is running chroot'ed
|
| /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/Net/DNS/RR/.pm
| exists on the system.
| Not all mails will trigger the following error, I'm c
Claude,
| RedHat Linux 9.0, all available patches applied
| amavisd-new-20030616-p6, SpamAssassin version 2.60
You are not telling which MTA are you using.
| The problem becomes known as the system was not more operable because of
| nearly infinite swapping activities. "Out of memory" messages r
John,
| - The "action" routine would run through the hashes and compute the average
| spam levels for each IP, ...
|...
| I guess I need to sort out what a good criteria would be for action. Would
| average spam level be an adequate way to determine a "bad" IP? ...
Don't use 'average' on datasets
Neil,
| I don't know where I should post this.
amavis-user mailing list would be more appropriate.
| But maybe someone here can share the
| variables that I can use in /var/amavisd/notify_spam_sender.txt so that Spam
| Assassins report will be included when the mail is sent back to the sender.
>From Justin Mason:
| yeah. I would probably add a new arg for "metadata headers", e.g.
| (data => [EMAIL PROTECTED], add_From_line => 0,
|metadata => { 'X-Envelope-To' => '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]', ... });
| which SpamAssassin just mixes in with the real headers internally.
Merging 'met
| Oh -- BTW -- something occurred to me. There *IS* an API that
| milter/MTA-plugin developers can use to specify this info to SpamAssassin,
| after all. It's just implicit and hadn't occurred to me before.
|
| Our all_spam_to, etc. black/whitelisting code will check the following
| headers, s
| Could somebody please advise the best method of whitelisting messages
| from a given mailing list?
|
| 'whitelist_from' doesn't work because (a) the messages come 'From:'
| individual posters, and (2) the 'Sender:' address (which does reflect
| the mailing list) isn't in the set of headers chec
| BTW, good news for large site-wide bayes dbs: Theo has implemented a way
| to avoid auto-expiry in 2.60. The plan is that expiry can be disabled by
| setting bayes_expiry_max_db_size to 0.
|
| Then folks who wish to do an expiry from cron, can control this by using
| a config file which uses e
From: Simon Byrnand
| Unfortunately no, sendmail, at least up to version 8.11.x doesn't have any
| inbuilt way to throttle the local delivery rate.
| You have:
| QueueLA ... MaxDaemonChildren ... ConnectionRateThrottle ...
|
| None of these address the issue. Perhaps Sendmail 8.12.x has something
Mark,
| I solved it. :) This was UTF-8 related, alright; but simply setting LC_ALL
| to "en_US" would, alas, not make the errors go away. For one because my
| perllocale (FreeBSD 4.7R, Perl 5.8.0) does not have "en_US". It has all
| kinds of flavors, like "en_US.ISO_8859-1", "en_US.US-ASCII" and s
| This is interesting, I never even considered the benefits of running SA
| at the MTA level. Where can I find more information on this? I'd
| really like to look into having SA run system-wide before procmail ever
| sees the message.
Check http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
Several large
Tom, (and Hamish),
(thanks for your private mail, sounde very useful,
I'll reply to it separately)
| I use HEADER and not Envelope. There is always one FROM address
| in either case and that is what you are really looking for when
| you are whitelisting/blacklisting.
Just a quick side remark
Tom,
| > Turning on SA auto whitelists is presently not useful
| > with amavisd-new. There is a fundamental problem in that
| > SpamAssassin is geared to work fine with one-recipient-
| > -at-a-time messages, and amavisd-new tries to process
| > multi-recipient messages in one go if at all possibl
Tom,
| I'm trying to get SA 2.50 working under the amavisd-new release.
| It's working, I think. At least according to the logs.
| Between the two, there is a marked increase in performance.
| Very nice!
| But there is no WhiteList.
| Any suggestions on how to get this turned on?
Turning on SA
| From: Stephane Lentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| Ronan should have provided more information : I guess he's
| talking about some problem found by amavisd-new's author.
| The bug and patch is listed on http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ on
| Tips and FAQ -- spam scanners (Mail::SpamAssassin) sect
Tom,
| I was looking around for something that would work as an advanced
| filter under postfix. I've had recommendations for amavisd and
| found some "stuff" on spamproxyd.
|
| How is this related to SpamAssassin? spamproxyd and a lot of
| people here have mentioned amavis so I'll guess this
John,
Thanks for providing your settings. They are ok.
I asked for it because Postfix logs don't show port numbers,
so checking the most obvious was my first guess.
Actually your problem is more tricky, and I have seen
similar situations during testing. The telltale log entry is:
Dec 3 14:48:03
John,
| Perhaps this is a bit outside the scope of this group, but I'd appreciate
| any assistance in digging through my mail logs.
|
| I'm trying to follow Scott Henderson's Spamfilter relay server "Howto"
| http://www.geocities.com/scottlhenderson/spamfilter.html as applied to
| RedHat 8.0 alo
Eric,
| im using the php-sa-mysql as an interface
| for the users to set their prefrences. so, i need
| the amavisd-new to either not send the mail to
| SA so i can set the SA to use the sql lookup or
| have the amavisd-new to send the mail to SA
| With the sql lookups enabled.
...
| ok. i reread
Eric,
| ok. i thought that would be the right
| route to go with. ill recompile the amavisd-new
| without the SA option. then ill have amavisd-new
| send it to procmail then have the procmail send it to
| the spamassassin with the mysql option.
|
| i was already using the amavisd-new-20020517
| s
Mike,
| If 20020630 won't call Razor, directly, then that answers my question,
| quite nicely, actually.
I was talking about the upcomming November release.
Both the May and June versions only know how to use Razor 1.20.
| ... Given the advancements in Razor2 over Razor1, There really isn't
| a
Mike,
| Do you know whether or not 20020630 gives the option of not running razor
| from within amavisd? Or will it support the use of Razor2?
No option to disable it, but commenting-out the call would
be a quick-and-dirty solution.
The comming release will no longer call Razor,
and SA and vir
Eric,
| ... is there an easy way to stop the amavisd-new from
| sending the mail to SA? or are there some changes
| i can make to the configs? from what i have read,
| amavisd-new sends the mail to SA without the
| spamc/spamd running.
Either use the next-to-last version amavisd-new-20020517
(
- due to popular demand,
but wasn't in the distant past)
Regards
Mark
--
!!!!!!
!! Mark Martinec (system manager) tel +386 1 4773-575 !!
!! J. Stefan Institute, Jamova 39 fax +386 1 2519-385 !!
Justin,
| I installed successfully SA with amavisd through the spamproxy module.
| I understand that this is a new script and is not quite stable, so my
| question is: Can I setup SA without the spamproxy and be on the safe side
| in terms of stability and security?
Yes, you can use amavisd-new
> I'm very interested in running SpamAssassin site-wide on a few of my
> machines. Currently I'm Running Postfix for an MTA. Can anyone point me
> to some good documentation on setting up SpamAssassin With Postfix?
Try:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
and in particular:
http://www.ijs.si/
dman,
> | |> it is a requirement for a MTA that it removes 'Bcc:' addresses from
> | |> the header!
> | | NO. It is a requirement that the MTA *NOT* do anything to the data ...
> | Not necessarily - depends on how MUA passes message to MTA.
> | MUA can pass envelope addresses separately, otherwi
D-man, (and others),
|On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 09:36:41PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
|> The SMTP envelope address (sender and recipients) is quite
|> a different thing than the RFC822 addresses inside the mail header.
| Yes.
|
|> it is a requirement for a MTA that it removes 'B
s(),
and get_required_hits() ), avoiding the need for application using SA
to have to parse SA config files or hard-wire numbers.
Regards
Mark
--
!!!!!!
!! Mark Martinec (system manager) tel +386 1 4773-575 !!
!! J. Stefan
s otherwise this information is (partly) lost - can be available
in the 'Received:' headers, but there is no guarantee and no
simple way to parse them.
There is probably an extra benefit of having envelope addresses
available to SA rules.
Regards
Mark
--
!
call SA, but quite cheap
and useful to only call Razor
Regards
Mark
(btw, amavis-new home is at: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ )
--
!!!!!!
!! Mark Martinec (system manager) tel +386 1 4773-575 !!
!! J. Stefan Instit
usual location at:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
where also the most up-to-date version or FAQ
and certain other fresh documentation files live.
Mark Martinec
--
!!
!! Mark Martinec (system manager)
34 matches
Mail list logo
