Hi.
I started using SA a year ago. I use it in a site-wide confuguration-
spamd + milter + sendmail.
Now I noticed that the amount of spam written in russian increased, and
from this time I need to filter it.
Since 90% of the mail on my relay is in russian (cp1251/koi8-r) I can't
simply say in
Hello sckot,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 2:09:51 PM, you wrote:
s>I've noticed several spam mails with a lot of quoted text (quotes from
s> Dave Barry, some of Moby Dick, that sort of thing. Usually all
s> punction is stripped out, but not always.) included within brackets or
s> an HTML titl
Hello Charles,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 8:14:50 AM, you wrote:
CG> Example HTML below. SA seems to have not recognized the EE font as
CG> 'invisible', perhaps because it is just one or two points outside the
CG> 'range' permitted by SA? But also note that they have used a ZERO point
CG> s
Hi List.
I have attached a few mails that are still getting through.
These are scoring extremely low.
The number of mails like these that slip through is on the increase.
Any ideas as to how I can block them?
I am using SA2.62, Exim 4.30 (with the exiscan 4.30 patch), SA-exim 3.1 .
Thank you
Hello Sylvain,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 7:54:09 AM, you wrote:
SR> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Christian Nygaard wrote:
SR> A friend of mine also has suggested the following (the coding is my own,
SR> so if it doesn't work, I've poorly implemented the suggestion):
SR> header SYL_BAD_XOIP X-Ori
Hello George,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 9:30:33 PM, you wrote:
GM> Yes this basically my family site but my main email for most things so. I
GM> will probably be setting up alias's for ebay, shopping, etc.
I find that very handy. I have email accounts for [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Bob,
Thank you very much and everyone for all the help!!
Yes this basically my family site but my main email for most things so. I
will probably be setting up alias's for ebay, shopping, etc.
George
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, J
Hello Scott, John,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 9:07:01 PM, you wrote:
SW> John,
SW> After this I started adding custom cf's like Bigevil,backhair,
SW> etc. I also started pushing some of the default scores up and down
SW> according to what my beta testers were seeing. I'm now starting to
SW>
Hello George,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 8:10:02 PM, you wrote:
GM> Thanks seems to be v2.63
Good. Your host is up to date. That bodes well indeed.
GM> X-RWH-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
GM> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=8.0
GM> tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME,RCVD_I
Hello George,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 7:58:31 PM, you wrote:
GM> I believe I am limited to what my host has in the cpanel already.
GM> Yes I am on shared server sorry.
GM> I do have fantastico which will let me install some things but
GM> doesn't look related to anything like SA.
On your
John,
I also experienced what you see with the threshold. Out of the box , SA threshold of
5.0 did not cut the spam flow by much at all. I estimated atleast 70% of the spam
still came through. I was using a test group that had there spam marked but passed
through. This way I could tighten
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Will McCutcheon writes:
> >I am running SpamAssassin 2.61 with Sendmail 8.12.8 using Procmail 3.22.
[snip..]
> >A's IP as being in an RBL of dynamic IP's, despite my setting in
> >/etc/mail/spamassassi
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 05:29:08PM -0500, Will McCutcheon wrote:
> One of the web sites I host on my server (let us call this server A)
> has a mailing list that actually lives on a different server (server
> B). So, I have a forward in Sendmail on server A that redirects
> messages sent to the
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 04:56 PM 1/21/2004, you wrote:
Hi
SA offers the possibility of having a "smarter" whitelist which
whitelists only if the sending relay is "related" to the sending email,
like
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
is there a possibility to somehow do the oppos
Bob,
Thanks seems to be v2.63
X-RWH-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=8.0
tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
dorothea.rwhmax.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-RWH
Hello George,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 7:24:29 PM, you wrote:
GM> Sorry everyone I am very new to this and am reading the documentation just a
GM> bit much. I have set the required hits to 8 and understand white/black
GM> list.
Good start!
GM>From what I have read it seems SA will learn on
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Charles Gregory wrote:
> Right now, there would be no statistics, because the text obfu has just
> started. But as a side note, we don't have the disk space to run Bayes for
> all our users though I'm getting awfully tempted to talk the boss into
> an extra disk or two. So
Hello George,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 7:05:57 PM, you wrote:
RM> George Matos wrote:
>> I just got my domain name and am trying to setup spam assassin. I have
>> never used it before so I was looking for some setup instructions etc.
>>
>> Wife won't switch emails till I have it setup.
R
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
> Kettler
> Sent: January 21, 2004 2:52 PM
> To: Oliver Thalmann
> Cc: Spamassassin
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] doing a kind of "! whitelist_from_rcvd" possible ?
>
>
>
> For example:
>
> header __FROM_
Bob thanks.
I believe I am limited to what my host has in the cpanel already. Yes I am
on shared server sorry.
I do have fantastico which will let me install some things but doesn't look
related to anything like SA.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
Hello spam peeps
Adam Lopresto and I have recently begun working together on Chickenpox,
and while working on that set, it occurred to him how to fix the
limitations in Backhair, using similar ideas we're using in pox. This
change in essence "combines" Backhair & Popcorn.
Updated RPMS for Mandrake Linux 9.2 are available here:
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-tools-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
and the SRPM:
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-2.63-1mdk.
Good evening, George,
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, George Matos wrote:
> I just got my domain name and am trying to setup spam assassin. I have
> never used it before so I was looking for some setup instructions etc.
>
> Wife won't switch emails till I have it setup.
>
> Thanks in advance.
Sorry everyone I am very new to this and am reading the documentation just a
bit much. I have set the required hits to 8 and understand white/black
list.
>From what I have read it seems SA will learn on it's own and with my help
correct?
MTA I can't answer it's being hosted by realwebhost.net
O
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:21:07 -0600, you wrote:
>I have
>never used it before so I was looking for some setup instructions etc.
Have you tried any of the fairly extensive documentation on the SpamAssassin
website? What, specifically, are you looking for help with?
--
George Matos wrote:
I just got my domain name and am trying to setup spam assassin. I have
never used it before so I was looking for some setup instructions etc.
Wife won't switch emails till I have it setup.
Hi,
MTA, MTU, and any other information would be helpful.
Regards,
Rick
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Macdougall writes:
Please learn to set your email client to wrap your messages.
SA does not add a thread-index or X-Mail-Format-Warning header to any
email it process's. I'd check on any other programs that may be
handli
I just got
my domain name and am trying to setup spam assassin. I have never used it
before so I was looking for some setup instructions etc.
Wife won't
switch emails till I have it setup.
Thanks in
advance.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will McCutcheon writes:
>I am running SpamAssassin 2.61 with Sendmail 8.12.8 using Procmail 3.22.
>
>I have a mail server running on a cable modem whose IP is a dynamic
>pool, so I of course am blacklisted in several RBL's. I am a good boy,
>so I h
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 12:09 am, John August wrote:
> This just an idea, in the tradition of 'I've got a good idea and hope
> someone else will carry it through'. I don't expect it, but thought I'd
> throw it in :)
>
> I've noticed a lot of spam which tries to dilute scanners by including a
>
Hello John,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 6:42:34 AM, you wrote:
JF> I'm pretty new too, and I'd like some clarification about what is "stock" in
JF> SA and what's custom. ...
Stock rules are anything installed into the SA rules directory when you
install SA. Custom is anything else.
JF> I see v
I am running SpamAssassin 2.61 with Sendmail 8.12.8 using Procmail 3.22.
I have a mail server running on a cable modem whose IP is a dynamic
pool, so I of course am blacklisted in several RBL's. I am a good boy,
so I have my mail server direct all outgoing mail through my ISP's mail
server and
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:39:27AM -0700, Joshua Thornburg wrote:
> error: Failed dependencies:
> perl(Digest::SHA1) is needed by spamassassin-tools-2.63-1
>
> I added Digest::SHA1 via perl -MCPAN -e shell and it took with no problems.
> But I still get the same dependency error. Any sugg
Scott Lambert wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:35:04AM +0100, Claude Frantz wrote:
"John A. Hengstler" wrote:
I have noticed this as well.
I am using spamd on a separate server, and local.cf on that server
is ignored. I can put rules into /usr/local/share/spamassasin and
the pull in
Greetings all,
First time post, long time SA user. Solved several problems because of the
list, but this one I'm totally stuck on.
I'm trying to upgrade to the latest version (2.63) of SA from 2.60 and I
keep getting this error for the spamassassin tools i386 rpm.
error: Failed dependencies:
This just an idea, in the tradition of 'I've got a good idea and hope
someone else will carry it through'. I don't expect it, but thought I'd
throw it in :)
I've noticed a lot of spam which tries to dilute scanners by including a lot
of strings of random characters put together as words, or real
Any thoughts on the simplest way of installing spamassassin _and_ keeping it
current? On Redhat I used CPAN, no problems with it, guess I'm not 100%
sure on the benefits of doing it using CPAN vs RPM.
Any other "gotchas" with Suse and Spamassassin that I should know of? Quick
search of the archi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Macdougall writes:
>Steven Manross wrote:
>
>> I use a tool called "Outlook Redemption" (http://www.dimastr.com/Redemption ) to:
>> -save an Outlook message as an RFC822 file
>> -then run that file through SA,
>> -then reimport that message
Hello Bret,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 2:35:06 PM, you wrote:
BM> Has anyone successfully made SA on Windows with Perl 5.8.2? I finally
BM> gave up on it and went back to Perl 5.6.1. Any suggestions?
Had no problem here (under Cygwin):
> > spamassassin --version
> SpamAssassin version 2.62
>
Steven Manross wrote:
I use a tool called "Outlook Redemption" (http://www.dimastr.com/Redemption ) to:
-save an Outlook message as an RFC822 file
-then run that file through SA,
-then reimport that message file back to Outlook (my mailbox only).
I am having issues where SA reports incorrect
On Jan 21, 2004, at 15:36, Mike Batchelor wrote:
SA 2.6x run by itself out of .procmailrc or spamc/spamd seems to add
an autolearn=X flag to tell you what happened to the message as it
interacted with the autolearn system. But I run SA+MD on a relay, and
I don't get these flags when calling sp
Soon there will be one place to go ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 8:51 PM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] UPDATES Tripwire 1.16 and Bigevil 2.06k
>
>
>
> >http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/
At 04:27 PM 1/21/2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
If you bring in more context, rather than use whitelist_from_rcvd, he
wrote his own rule.
Sorry, not reading carefully enough.
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications
---
The SF.Net email is sponsor
I use a tool called "Outlook Redemption" (http://www.dimastr.com/Redemption ) to:
-save an Outlook message as an RFC822 file
-then run that file through SA,
-then reimport that message file back to Outlook (my mailbox only).
I am having issues where SA reports incorrect RFCness in the export
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:06 PM -0700 Nels Lindquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What exactly are you trying to accomplish? Maybe there's another
way.
I want to generate some kind of record in the logs, or record in the mail
headers, indicating what the autolearn disposition of the mess
At 06:56 PM 1/21/2004, Kelson Vibber wrote:
I suspect he did:
>At 04:43 PM 1/21/2004, Brad Hazledine wrote:
>>However, the rule seems to pick up the "by fargo.caledoncard.com" in the
>>header and thinks that all is well.
No, he did not use whitelist_from_rcvd.
If you bring in more context, rather
I'm using SA 2.60 through spamd with exim 4.30 and exiscan-acl 4.30-14.
After adding Tripwire to my rules (some local, bigevil, popcorn) I began
to get the following errors in mainlog:
2004-01-17 12:46:35 1AhpqL-0004TL-Bz string_sprintf expansion was longer
than 8192
When I remove tripwir
On 21 Jan 2004 at 15:36, Mike Batchelor wrote:
> SA 2.6x run by itself out of .procmailrc or spamc/spamd seems to add an
> autolearn=X flag to tell you what happened to the message as it interacted
> with the autolearn system. But I run SA+MD on a relay, and I don't get
> these flags when call
At 02:53 PM 1/21/2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
Why not change your domain whitelist to a whitelist_from_rcvd command,
instead of whitelist_from.
I suspect he did:
At 04:43 PM 1/21/2004, Brad Hazledine wrote:
However, the rule seems to pick up the "by fargo.caledoncard.com" in the
header and thinks th
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:34:07PM -0800, Bret Miller wrote:
> > I downloaded the .srpm and built it. It just uses make.
> > (all of this under cygwin).
> >
> > If this isn;t your environment, I'm not sure how I can help
> > further. I did want you to know that it is working under
> > Perl 5.8
SA 2.6x run by itself out of .procmailrc or spamc/spamd seems to add an
autolearn=X flag to tell you what happened to the message as it interacted
with the autolearn system. But I run SA+MD on a relay, and I don't get
these flags when calling spam_assassin_check() from mimedefang-filter's
filt
> I downloaded the .srpm and built it. It just uses make.
> (all of this under cygwin).
>
> If this isn;t your environment, I'm not sure how I can help
> further. I did want you to know that it is working under
> Perl 5.8.0 though.
OK... I'm running it under ActivePerl 5.6.1 natively in Windows
Ooops. Try that again...
Full headers at bottom of message:
|-Original Message-
|From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 15:03
|To: SpamAssassin
|Subject: Re: [SAtalk] How to stop this kind of stuff?
|
|
|
|
|--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 2:52 PM -
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:35:06PM -0800, Bret Miller wrote:
> Has anyone successfully made SA on Windows with Perl 5.8.2? I finally
> gave up on it and went back to Perl 5.6.1. Any suggestions?
>
> Bret
Bret,
I've just made it using Perl v 5.8.0 today and it is working perfectly AFAICT.
I know
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 2:52 PM -0800 Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This one got through, yet it's obvious.
>
> I'm including two different versions of the message, both saved from our
> Exchange 5.5 server.
>
> Any thoughts appreciated - we're running the new consolidated
>
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
> Added another more obscure tag. Thanks Kelson. Version 1.3
>
thanks for all your work !
regards,
Matthias
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools
Why not change your domain whitelist to a whitelist_from_rcvd command,
instead of whitelist_from.
You'll avoid the forgery problem outright.
At 04:43 PM 1/21/2004, Brad Hazledine wrote:
Has anyone written a rule that catches mail supposedly sent by yourself to
yourself?
Example here...
Receive
I am running SpamAssassin 2.61 with Sendmail 8.12.8 using Procmail 3.22.
I have a mail server running on a cable modem whose IP is a dynamic
pool, so I of course am blacklisted in several RBL's. I am a good boy,
so I have my mail server direct all outgoing mail through my ISP's mail
server and
This one got through, yet it's obvious.
I'm including two different versions of the message, both saved from our
Exchange 5.5 server.
Any thoughts appreciated - we're running the new consolidated
backhair/popcorn, chickenpox, nov2rules, evilnumbers, bigevil, and a few
custom rules that I've glean
Hi,
How are you running spamd ? The filter.sh script shows it running
spamassassin, not spamc. If you've modified it to run spamc instead of
spamassassin, are you passing the username with the -c option to spamc ?
Are you running spamd with the -q option to tell it to use SQL
preferences?
At 04:56 PM 1/21/2004, you wrote:
Hi
SA offers the possibility of having a "smarter" whitelist which
whitelists only if the sending relay is "related" to the sending email,
like
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
is there a possibility to somehow do the opposite, ie
"blacklist [E
Has anyone successfully made SA on Windows with Perl 5.8.2? I finally
gave up on it and went back to Perl 5.6.1. Any suggestions?
Bret
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Int
I
recommend you follow one of these guides, they both use
SpamAssassin
CREATING A SPAMFILTER RELAY SERVER
http://www.geocities.com/scottlhenderson/spamfilter.html
Fairly-Secure
Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and
DCC
http://www.flakshack.com/a
On 21 Jan 2004 at 13:01, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 21 January 2004 11:59, Jesse Regier wrote:
> > Is there a way to have Spamassassin use a seperate bayes database for
> > each local domain or group of domains?
> >
> > It would be
I've noticed several spam mails with a lot of quoted text (quotes from
Dave Barry, some of Moby Dick, that sort of thing. Usually all
punction is stripped out, but not always.) included within brackets or
an HTML title. It's likely being used to counterweight the
message against a Bayesian filte
+[ To [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20.Jan.2004 16:09):
|
| Hi,
|
| I just installed SpamAssassin-2.6.1 under FreeBSD-4.9.
| Installation was from the FreeBSD ports collection.
[snipped]
| As for the possible cause, yes I have NIS (YP) running.
[replying to myself, just for the r
Keith Dowell wrote:
> I made this point on a mimedefang list. Some people didn't really
> like it.
I like your point but I have some minor points of interest.
>
> Computers are too complicated for people to be responsible some said.
>
> So I tried equating it to maintaining your car in that, if
I want to be able to take an email message that may contain MIME and HTML
and to strip it down to basically nothing but text. (I know that
SpamAssassin already does this in large part so that it can analyze the
message properly.) So I'm not actually using SpamAssassin to detect spam.
Instead, I jus
Hi
SA offers the possibility of having a "smarter" whitelist which
whitelists only if the sending relay is "related" to the sending email,
like
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
is there a possibility to somehow do the opposite, ie
"blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] only if the relay
At 02:00 PM 1/21/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The spam I was trying to catch doesn't seem to be going through the rules
I added. What else do I have to do?
I'd start off with a run of spamassassin --lint to make sure you don't have
a typo.
After that, if it still doesn't work check the debug ou
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Here's my original post, to which I got some great replies (thanks!) but
I've run into a bit of an odd snag, detailed below.
Ok, so I set up the web interface, the database, and everything that I
could think of, but spamd isn't talking to the database. :(
I'm callin
Has anyone written a rule that catches mail supposedly sent by yourself to
yourself?
Example here...
Received: from WIN-SYEZX91ADBP ([61.50.222.200])
by fargo.caledoncard.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id
i0L6pDT5006761
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 01:51:14
-0500
Me
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 January 2004 14:17
> To: Alan Munday
> Subject: RE: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour
>
>
> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 20:12, Alan Munday wrote:
> > Chris
> >
> > Maybe the other way to do this is to hav
Here's my original post, to which I got some great replies (thanks!) but
I've run into a bit of an odd snag, detailed below.
Hey all,
I'm working on a spamassassin gateway machine, and I'm a bit
confused on how to set up the machine so users can have their own
user_prefs files.
* The machin
Working great here - about 100 active accounts now on a small mail server,
SuSE 9.0. If your MTA uses spamd we found that the startup script for SuSE
8.2 located at http://devel-home.kde.org/~kmail/unsupported/spamd works
great.
We install only from cpan for SA on SuSE 9. No issues at all.
Todd
I am new to SpamAssassin. I did not want to accidentally lose mail,
but even with the Subject being re-written getting SPAM mail
throughout the day was distracting. My solution was to filter all
mailed labeled as SPAM to a special folder using procmail and then
run a cron job to deliver all the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 11:59, Jesse Regier wrote:
> Is there a way to have Spamassassin use a seperate bayes database for
> each local domain or group of domains?
>
> It would be nice to have something like...
>
> bayes_path = /var/spool/$DOMA
Some archive searching has revealed that multi-line matching isn't
available yet. Is there another way to rework this rule that I'm
missing, using meta rules perhaps? It would single-handedly get a lot of
spam that I get, which is consistantly of the form of three "ambiguous
product pitch:\
Added another more obscure tag. Thanks Kelson. Version 1.3
Jennifer
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anahe
I agree...certainly use MailScanner. Ultimately, this is a job for the MTA
though. I can give you exact details on how to do it with sendmail. If you
use Postfix, someone else will have to help you.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
Is there a way to have Spamassassin use a seperate bayes database for
each local domain or group of domains?
It would be nice to have something like...
bayes_path = /var/spool/$DOMAIN_bayes
in the spamassassin.cf file. $DOMAIN would be replaced with the
domain from the current recipeint addre
I understand. Thanks
--
- Original Message -
DATE: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:10:55
From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
>At 01:02 PM 1/21/2004, st semps wrote:
>
>>You see I thought that ToCc was valid. I thought I had read that
>>somewh
Subconsciously, People may be Bayesian
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/1/20/43756/9394
--
Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy
It's us against them. Ride like you stole it!
http://linuxlink.com
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored b
If I use a global procmailrc, bayes is used by only one user (spam).
So, statistically, is better to have one bayes database per user, so,
how to make a single procmailrc to have one bayes databse for each user?
Any ideas?
Thanxs
---
The SF
Microsoft fix? You can't fix it if it isn't broke :)
It's a feature. (kidding)
On to what you said. Obviously your friend is savvy enough and intelligent
enough to know that he doesn't know enough. So he brings it to you. Sorta my
point.
When I say have more educated users, this is what I'm real
I have been running SA-2.61 with spamd/sendmail/spamass-milter/procmail
since Jan 14.
Yesterday, I starting getting multiple errors in the logs as:
/kernel: pid 349 (perl5.00503), uid 2: exited on signal 10 (or signal 11)
The above has been going on since yesterday with hundreds of perl5 drop
out
> The most appropriate response would be to demand Microsoft fix
> their software.
That is about as effective as trying to catch your breath in a vacuum. :)
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Too
Chris Thielen wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 18:23, Erik Slooff wrote:
Hi Chris,
Small change for RulesDuJour: when sa is not in path lint will not succeed
(line 313). Maybe you could add a variable that contains the path to sa in
the settings?
Erik
Will do. Should have it up tomorrow, al
Thanks to Sylvain, Doug K. & Chris P. for their ideas on improving the rules!
Changes:
Added some more entries (many more to come within the next few days, just
need time to process them)
Changed "(\s|-|\.)" in phone numbers to "\W+", file should require less
memory to run, is easier to read and
Thanks! That took care of it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:50 PM
> To: Jody Cleveland; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Not able to run sa-learn
>
> Correction: the rm should rm bayes.lock, not baye
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:48:30 -0500
Ben Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have had Spamassassin running for long enough to have BAYES kick in.
> I realized the other day when I checked out all my rulesets with
> spamassassin -D --lint, I was getting a BAYES_0 test result. I never
> saw suc
I'm running SpamAssassin using spamd, and invoking on my own system
through an entry in procmailrc. SpamAssassin runs fine and does indeed
properly filter out a lot of spam.
Yesterday, I added a number of rules to $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs.
I ran /home/alayne/sausr/bin/spamassassin -D < /tmp
Hello,
I'm running spamassassin 2.62 with MailScanner on redhat 9. What I'm
trying to run is this:
sa-learn -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf --spam --mbox
/var/spool/mail/bayes
But, it just sits there. Sa-learn --rebuild and --force-expire work
fine. When I first upgraded from 2.61 to
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:13:26PM -0500, Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know tons of people with broadband connections that might be on only a few
> times a week. Some don't even notice their cpu is slower. I also know some
> pretty intelligent people that despite what they try, sti
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 18:23, Erik Slooff wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Small change for RulesDuJour: when sa is not in path lint will not succeed
> (line 313). Maybe you could add a variable that contains the path to sa in
> the settings?
>
> Erik
>
Will do. Should have it up tomorrow, along with so
I have had Spamassassin running for long enough to have BAYES kick in.
I realized the other day when I checked out all my rulesets with
spamassassin -D --lint, I was getting a BAYES_0 test result. I never
saw such a thing from my email. I figured out that I needed to
specifically run spamc a
At 01:41 PM 1/21/2004, Jody Cleveland wrote:
Here's what I get:
debug: Syncing Bayes journal and expiring old tokens...
debug: lock: 21404 created
/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes.lock.mystique.winnefox.org.21404
debug: lock: 21404 trying to get lock on /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes
with 0 retries
The t
Correction: the rm should rm bayes.lock, not bayes_*.lock. My typo.
At 01:41 PM 1/21/2004, Jody Cleveland wrote:
Here's what I get:
debug: Syncing Bayes journal and expiring old tokens...
debug: lock: 21404 created
/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes.lock.mystique.winnefox.org.21404
debug: lock: 21404 tr
SpamAssassin 2.63 SRPM:
http://rpms.alerque.com/SRPMS/spamassassin-2.63-1.src.rpm
SpamAssassin 2.63 RPMS compiled for PLD i686:
http://rpms.alerque.com/RPMS/
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools
>
> I'm not sure I'd do this. One day (for a bunch of reasons) I whitelisted
> my own address, and promptly got a bunch of spam "from" myself.
>
Good point, but all local addresses can (and must) be verified based upon
the incoming gateway's Received: header.
---
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
