On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Charles Gregory wrote: > Right now, there would be no statistics, because the text obfu has just > started. But as a side note, we don't have the disk space to run Bayes for > all our users.... though I'm getting awfully tempted to talk the boss into > an extra disk or two. So for now, no Bayes here.... :-(
A site-wide Bayes isn't quite as effective as a per-user Bayes, but still worthwhile. It will help to catch the obfu junk (and only takes 10~20 Mbytes of disk). So now you have no excuse, get Bayes-ing. ;) -- Dave Funk University of Iowa <dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering 319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527 #include <std_disclaimer.h> Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{ ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk