> Yes, the situation I'm talking about is lots of spamd processes running at
> once using lots of memory. (Not to mention the local delivery processes
> running at the same time as well)
>
> Spamd using 800MB of ram is a bug, and one which I've never encountered
> yet in months of using spamd, so i
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey all,
> http://www.au.sorbs.net/ <---looks kind of neat. Is there any way to
> write a rule to have SpamAssassin peek at it? I'm guessing that the
> answer is "yes" but the obvious fact is that I have no idea how to do
On Oct 18, 2003 at 16:20, Arlo Gilbert wrote:
>it would appear from the data im seeing that bayes is learning the to
>and received headers on mails... obviously this seems a bit redundant
>and will only add to the size of the bayes db, without contributing
>anything (maybe even harming the learnin
Hey all,
http://www.au.sorbs.net/ <---looks kind of neat. Is there any way to
write a rule to have SpamAssassin peek at it? I'm guessing that the
answer is "yes" but the obvious fact is that I have no idea how to do it. :)
-Jonathan
---
Thi
I've had 5 variants of this slip through, all of them have
"ournames.com" in the source but varying "from" addresses.
Thank you! :)
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate.pbp.net (mailgate.pbp.net [192.168.10.87])
by mail.pbp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D453317A0B
it would appear from the data im seeing that bayes is learning the to
and received headers on mails... obviously this seems a bit redundant
and will only add to the size of the bayes db, without contributing
anything (maybe even harming the learning?) of the bayes engine.
any thoughts on this?
> Simon Byrnand wrote on Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:35 +1300:
>
>> 128MB is not enough in my experience. I found that with 128MB of ram
>> that I
>> had to limit concurant scanning to no more than 5 spamd processes at
>> once
>> or a burst of incomming traffic would push the machine into swap
>> render
spamassassin calls a directly executed perl script - NO spamd involved.
And this carries the resource loads of loading/compiling the code for
every piece of mail.
spamc (which you should use in place of 'spamassassin' in your procmailrc)
needs to have spamd running as a daemon process.
- Charle
Thanks for the response.
Yes, I do run Razor2, and yes I did the patch.
Could the patch not have "taken," though?
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Morris
S
> Quick question.
>
> I have the usual line in my .procmailrc file of
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> * < 256000
> | spamassassin
>
> Which I *think* calls spamc? I don't have spamd running on my system and
> SA is working so I assume it's either calling spamc or on demand calling
> spamd.
Hmm,
Loo
On Sa 18 Okt 2003 02:21:34p Soeren Gerlach wrote:
> debug: bayes: something fishy, calculating atime (first pass)
> debug: bayes: couldn't find a good delta atime, need more token
> difference, skipping expire.
Hi,
I am having exactly the same problems here since some time. I also
upgraded from
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:58:04PM -0400, Chris wrote:
> Quick question.
>
> I have the usual line in my .procmailrc file of
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock * < 256000 | spamassassin
>
> Which I *think* calls spamc? I don't have spamd running on my system and SA
> is working so I assume it's either
Bill Polhemus wrote:
I realize this is a Perl problem, but can anyone help me diagnose
this? I know next to NOTHING about Perl.
The following is an error message I get when attempting to run SA from
an email alias under Sendmail:
- Transcript of session follows -
Insecure
I have an account with Lunarpages.com, a web hosting company. They
provide SpamAssassin 2.55, enabled through cPanel 8.2.0-RELEASE 28.
Their mailer is Exim 4.23.
A few days back, SpamAssassin stopped working -- it stopped adding
X-spam-status (etc.) headers to incoming emails. I contacted Lunar
I realize this is a Perl problem, but can anyone help me
diagnose this? I know next to NOTHING about Perl.
The following is an error message I get when attempting to run
SA from an email alias under Sendmail:
- Transcript of session follows -
Insecure dependency in sy
Hi!
A new mailing list SpamAssassin-Devel-BR (Brazilian portuguese) has been
created. More info here:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel-br
The list is supposed to work in a similar fashin as already existant
German list (spamassassin-devel-de), and we already have
Quick question.
I have the usual line in my .procmailrc file
of
:0fw: spamassassin.lock* < 256000|
spamassassin
Which I *think* calls spamc? I don't have
spamd running on my system and SA is working so I assume it's either calling
spamc or on demand calling spamd.
Can anyone clarify wh
I switched over to RPM's from CPAN (i'll send a not
later on what I did and what I found by doing it) but now I notice that
bayes doesn't seem to learn.
sa-learn --dumpUse of uninitialized value in
numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line
1
I am trying to pre-filter a bit in .promailrc, to catch some addressed names
within my domain and totally get rid of them (for test purposes I'm sending
them to a file, but really want them to go to /dev/null).
However, I'm seeing them go to the files, and then get handed off to Spam
Assassin,
Simon Byrnand wrote on Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:35 +1300:
> 128MB is not enough in my experience. I found that with 128MB of ram that I
> had to limit concurant scanning to no more than 5 spamd processes at once
> or a burst of incomming traffic would push the machine into swap rendering
> it unu
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:00:30 -0700 "ian douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have any information on infinite-monkeys on how to contact them regarding
> getting removed from their systems?
Spammers DDoS'd them off the net. Stop checking their DNSBL and tell
others to stop using it too. mo
> Spammers DDoS'd them off the net. Stop checking their DNSBL and tell
> others to stop using it too. monkeys.com is dead.
Okay, thanks.
-id
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Data
I had a similar problem where a lot of email was being tagged as spam. I just
upped the requirement to 5.5 and that helped immensely. I have yet to get a
false positive for reasons other than acceptable languages. I only have a
couple users that still get more than one or two unmarked spams a day i
> On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
> > -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
> > SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As
a
>
> I wasn't even
"Colin A. Bartlett" writes:
>Matthew McGehrin Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:40 PM
>
>> I think you are expecting too much from a 'Free' List Server.
>
>Just to set the record straight, It wasn't my intent to complain... only see
>if others had the same issues. If other people feel stupid becau
Hi,
I'm using SA 2.60 and have trained with about ~5.000 spams over the last
weeks and months. I've started with 2.50 and switched to 2.60 a few weeks
ago. Currently there are some ~300K tokens in the database which I'd like to
expire with the following settings:
bayes_expiry_max_db_size 30
* Daniel M. Drucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-18 09:38]:
> Is there a way to discover what SA currently treats as trusted?
Yes, running with debug (-D) switch turn on.
Received.pm:
dbg ("received-header: relay ".$relay->{ip}." trusted? ".
($in_trusted ? "yes" : "no"))
For the record I also began noticing many more 100% Bayesian matches after
upgrading from 2.55 to 2.6. So far it hasn't resulted in any false
positives that I'm aware of, but it has left me feeling slightly uneasy.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Ben Wing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I think you may be misinterpreting the auto_whitelist_path option.
For instance, if you have a line in local.cf like:
auto_whitelist_path/var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist
then /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist is not a directory.
Instead, it means that SA will create a file in
/var/
the test message that got flagged by the Bayesian analyzer as 100% spam actually
had a bit more than just "test" in the body since i sent it from a yahoo
account:
--
test.
--
> At 03:10 PM 10/16/2003, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
> >I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as
> >I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
> >I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem...
>
> Dan.. Are you using an interna
Stewart, John schrieb am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2003 um 14:02:31 -0500:
>
> I finally got around to installing 2.60 today in my system, running it with
> amavisd-new (which I also bumped up to the latest, 20030616.
>
> I'm very happy that the bayes opportunistic expiration is now configurable
> wi
I manage three domains which are hosted on three different servers by the
same hosting company, all of which use SpamAssassin. Last night, one of
the servers was migrated from SA 2.55 to SA 2.60
I am using the same user_prefs file on all three systems.
> spamassassin --lint
returns with no errors
hi. i just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.6 and i'm seeing something rather odd about
the Bayesian results: nearly every one is almost exactly 0%, 50%, or 100%! it's
almost as if it's applying an extreme rounding function to the actual result.
now, these are turning out so far to be accurate, but i'm st
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:13:27 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael W.Cocke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:37 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] CPAN or RPM's?
>
>--snip--
>
>> And, to bring this post back toward the s
35 matches
Mail list logo
