Simon Byrnand wrote on Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:35 +1300: > 128MB is not enough in my experience. I found that with 128MB of ram that I > had to limit concurant scanning to no more than 5 spamd processes at once > or a burst of incomming traffic would push the machine into swap rendering > it unusable. >
But if that problem occurs you would see the different spamd processes in top and not only one spamd entry, would you? I ask because we had the same problem happen twice, but not any concurrent spamd processes, just spamd grabbing enormous amounts (800 MB) of memory. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
