On Oct 18, 2003 at 16:20, Arlo Gilbert wrote: >it would appear from the data im seeing that bayes is learning the to >and received headers on mails... obviously this seems a bit redundant >and will only add to the size of the bayes db, without contributing >anything (maybe even harming the learning?) of the bayes engine.
Makes sense to me. If you're getting a lot of spam from certain networks, the Received: headers would reflect that. For ham, the headers would be learned as ham and would offset other negative scores. I don't see a problem. I'd trust header+body-based Bayesian a little bit more than just body-based. Beyond a certain point, it's difficult to fake received headers. -- Satya. <URL:http://www.thesatya.com/> One man's "magic" is another man's engineering. "Supernatural" is a null word. -- Robert Heinlein ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
