Justin Mason writes:
[...autoreporting]
Whoa -- that's a 2 day delay on posts to the SpamAssassin-talk list.
not good :(
--j.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Fo
Beirne Konarski writes:
>On Sunday 27 July 2003 10:32 pm, Beirne Konarski wrote:
>> I'm trying to use Trustic with Spamassassin. I have a working Trustic
>> account and followed the instructions at Trustic to use it with SA
>> (http://www.trustic.com/help/dns#SA), but it doesn't look like SA is
>
Hi,
I get an "unable to report spam" warning when I do a "spamassassin
-r". Some of the debug lines:
debug: Removing Markup
debug: Razor1 is not available
debug: Current PATH is:
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/games:/home/christian/bin
debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not fo
At 00:04 28/07/2003 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I seem to be getting a number of false positives because of
ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org
This is an rbl that IMNSHO should *not* be used by anyone unless they
deliberately want to block all clients of uunet. I know of which I speak.
Can someone tell me ho
set RCVD_IN_RFCI to 0 in your prefs file. It's the same for all rules I
believe.
e.g.:
score RCVD_IN_RFCI 0
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamassassin talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 5:04 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] How to remove a
At 7/27/03 09:04 PM , Steven W. Orr wrote:
I seem to be getting a number of false positives because of
ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org
[snip]
Can someone tell me how to shut it off?
The test appears to be called RCVD_IN_RFCI; you could just set its score to
0 in 50_scores.cf. Alternatively, the other par
Yep, mine works.
This is my entry in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
# Use the Trustic community-based block list
header RCVD_IN_TRUSTIC eval:check_rbl('isp', 'assigned adress.')
# <-note dot on the end of address
describe RCVD_IN_TRUSTICFound in Trustic community blocking list
I seem to be getting a number of false positives because of
ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org
This is an rbl that IMNSHO should *not* be used by anyone unless they
deliberately want to block all clients of uunet. I know of which I speak.
Can someone tell me how to shut it off?
TIA
--
-Time flies lik
On Sunday 27 July 2003 10:32 pm, Beirne Konarski wrote:
> I'm trying to use Trustic with Spamassassin. I have a working Trustic
> account and followed the instructions at Trustic to use it with SA
> (http://www.trustic.com/help/dns#SA), but it doesn't look like SA is
> checking it. I ran SA in de
I'm trying to use Trustic with Spamassassin. I have a working Trustic account
and followed the instructions at Trustic to use it with SA
(http://www.trustic.com/help/dns#SA), but it doesn't look like SA is checking
it. I ran SA in debug mode and also did a line trace to watch what was going
o
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonardo Costa
>
> i'm using SA at procmail and i set to send the spam emails to the
> following file (/var/spool/mail/spam). is there some way to
> send it to an especifie file at users home directory?
By the way you are writing this, I assume that you ar
At Fri Jul 25 09:16:45 2003, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Martin Radford wrote:
> >
> > If that's correct, I think people on the beta program really should
> > report it as a bug, irrespective of the fact that a Message-ID is not
> > technically mandatory.
>
> Lots of headers that S
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:52 am, Jeff Funk wrote:
> Here's a header of an e-mail I just received. The F'word has been replaced
> with X's. Isn't there a default rule in SA somewhere that would catch
> that? Seems like a pretty obvious nasty to me . . . .
No, such a word is commonly used in non-
On Sunday 27 July 2003 04:41 am, Bonny wrote:
> How may I check spam that wasn't detected by SA and thus add or adjust
> SA to catch those messages too?
You can look at full headers for the spam, then check out the "X-Spam-Status"
header; it will tell you how many hits the message got, and which
At 23:17 25/07/2003 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 03:09 PM 7/25/03 +0300, Turgut Kalfaoglu wrote:
> >How does one go about blacklisting an entire network, say for example
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not seem to work?
If you have the option; block it from the firewall OR router.
It saves SO much overh
Branko F. Grac(nar wrote:
as stated in perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf parameter auto_learn is on by
default and i don't have it anywhere disabled. Nothing changes even if i set
it to value 1.
Hmmm ... using amavisd-new (for me v20030616 section VII =~ line 1061 in
amavisd.conf) I have to tur
Turgut Kalfaoglu wrote:
Yes I do; proper access rights and all.
I ended up deleting everything bayes* in /etc/mail/spamassassin and it's
re-creating them now. really odd. -turgut
Tell us what happened and if you solved it. Hope you made a backup of
the database first :)
Not that it has anything
Nix wrote:
however, blocking entire IP classes such as 61.*.*.* is, in my opinion, a
very narrow minded thing to do. keep in mind that the internet is a global
entity, and by blocking that particular IP class, you'll have blocked me
from being able to reply to you.
Not necessarily. Blocking 240.0
At 13:56 25/07/2003 -0400, Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist wrote:
What is the maximum number of white/blacklist entries before SA chokes
(V2.54)? I'm resuming 300+ is nowheres near the limit.
Also, if these are on a single line, how long can it wrap for? Is 1600+
characters too long?
Hi Da
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>Fed up with people who expect everyone else to be clairvoyants.
Please accept my apologies; I was not sufficiently clairvoyant to know what
information _you_ would think was important in _my_ message.
That said, I disagree with the premise any of the info you asked for _is_
At 11:40 PM 7/24/03 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
In any event, SA doesn't seem to be filtering spam at all. I only get
about 1 or 2 spams a day, so it's hard to say anything certain, but not a
single one of those (in the last 3 days) has been picked up by SA.
What mechanism did you use to integrat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:36:20AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> >Mailserver - FreeBSD. Again, why does this matter? How could it possibly
> >matter?
>
> FreeBSD is not a mailserver.
I thought it was. Isn't a mail server a computer that serves mail
i'm using SA at procmail and i set to send the spam emails to the
following file (/var/spool/mail/spam). is there some way to send it to
an especifie file at users home directory?
#what i have now
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/var/spool/mail/spam
#what i want to have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 06:26:09PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> >Today two pieces of nasty x-rated spam came through the filters with
> >negative
> >scores because the spammer spoofed the From address to be _my_ address (the
> >address part only; the
On Sunday, Jul 27, 2003, at 12:27 US/Pacific, Nix wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Daniel Carrera stipulated:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Nix wrote:
Spam actually seems to differ quite a lot between individuals,
Really? Why would that be the case?
I think it depends which spammers' ma
Vicki Brown wrote:
Excuse me... refuse? REFUSE? Refuse _point blank_??? What are you on ?!
Fed up with people who expect everyone else to be clairvoyants. Think
about it.
Mailserver - FreeBSD. Again, why does this matter? How could it possibly
matter?
FreeBSD is not a mailserver.
MTA -sendmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 of July 2003 20:26, Mark Martinec wrote:
> From my logs (SA 2.60):
> debug: bayes: 2816 tie-ing to DB file R/O
> /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_toks debug: bayes: 2816 tie-ing to DB file
> R/O /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
>
> d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chris,
Friday, July 25, 2003, 7:09:32 AM, you wrote:
CS> Well I've done another update on the rules site. Some great rules
CS> submitted again. Lots I want to incorporate myself.
Agreed. I've captured a few that I've added to my user_prefs. Th
--On Thursday, July 24, 2003 6:31 PM -0400 Jason Parsons is rumoured to
have written:
I'm having a bit of confusion around virtual users in spamassassin with
qmail. I would like to use a configuration based on the username part of
the 'rcpt to' email address of a message.
What am I missing? Is
Can anybody help?
Any idea how to install SA on SuSE webmailserver 2.0
Trying install SA (like on other Servers) with webmin fails.
trying
$#>perl -MCPAN -e shell
shell#> install Mail::SpamAssassin
fails too.
Is there anybody outside, can help?
Kurt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello AltGrendel,
Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 11:41:34 AM, you wrote:
A> Ok, I've seen lots of requests and no responce for a SpamAssassin
A> rules wiki. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't recall any responses saying
A> "I have one here".
I didn't have one
On Friday, Jul 25, 2003, at 12:55 US/Mountain, Justin Mason wrote:
However, I have heard that spamcop's reporting tool will do a decent
job
of it;
Not in my experience. We got blacklisted because a user on one of our
mailing lists got infected with a virus that sent something that got
tagged a
AFAIK, this is what a spamcop report does.
With the bonus that the spam source might be added to spamcop's RBL.
IMO, it would be a good addition to sa to have spamassassin -R report
to spamcop too. (Maybe a Net::Spam::Spamcop.pm would help ;)
[]'s
Raul Dias
Em Sex, 2003-07-25 às 13:50, [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, I KNOW!
My MTA is configured to redirect emails that fail SA's test. This is
demonstrated by the fact that it has already redirected over 100 emails
which failed SA's test.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:44:59AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> D
At 18:26 +0200 2003-07-27, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>Vicki Brown wrote:
>
>> Today two pieces of nasty x-rated spam came through the filters with
>>negative
>> scores because the spammer spoofed the From address to be _my_ address (the
>> address part only; the "real name" is not mine, they don't have
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Daniel Carrera stipulated:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Nix wrote:
>
>> Spam actually seems to differ quite a lot between individuals,
>
> Really? Why would that be the case?
I think it depends which spammers' mailing lists you've landed up on.
--
`We canno
Here's a header of an e-mail I just received. The F'word has been replaced with X's.
Isn't there a default rule in SA somewhere that would catch that? Seems like a pretty
obvious nasty to me . . . .
Subject: Naked victims being XX
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=6.6
tests=DAT
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Apthorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Taint mode?
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 19:13:59 +0200 "Jim Knuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > what is the taint mode?
> >
> > in command "spa
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, alan premselaar said:
> however, blocking entire IP classes such as 61.*.*.* is, in my opinion, a
> very narrow minded thing to do. keep in mind that the internet is a global
> entity, and by blocking that particular IP class, you'll have blocked me
> from being able to reply
Phone Call to our ISP:
"Hi, I work for ipost.com, we write a anti-spam software for ISP's, would
you be interested in evaluating our software?"
I said: "No thanks." I SHOULD HAVE said: "Do you have anything that gets
rid of phone spams?"
:-)
Evan
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 19:13:59 +0200 "Jim Knuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what is the taint mode?
>
> in command "spamassassin -tD < sample-spam.txt"
> come " taint mode? no "
Taint mode is a security feature of perl designed to reduce problems
stemming from suspect user data. Basically, under
Tony: Yes I do; proper access rights and all.
I ended up deleting everything bayes* in /etc/mail/spamassassin and it's
re-creating them now. really odd. -turgut
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Turgut Kalfaoglu wrote:
>
> > # spamassassin --lint
> > Failed to run BAYES_90 SpamAssass
Matt Kettler writes:
>That and SA might not be able to accurately determine what IP needs to be
>reported.. (ie: is your first MX the most recent, or the second most recent
>received: line? is one of them forged to make it appear that a message went
>to your secondary MX, then to the primary an
Vicki Brown wrote:
Today two pieces of nasty x-rated spam came through the filters with negative
scores because the spammer spoofed the From address to be _my_ address (the
address part only; the "real name" is not mine, they don't have that
information).
Solve this at your MTA level. Only you kno
Turgut Kalfaoglu wrote:
# spamassassin --lint
Failed to run BAYES_90 SpamAssassin test, skipping:
(No write permission to ndbm file at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line
933.
Etc. The spamd/amavis/procmail user who/whatever it is doesn't have
write
Hi,
what is the taint mode?
in command "spamassassin -tD < sample-spam.txt"
come " taint mode? no "
cu Jim
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Bonny,
I second Daniel's suggestion to use the Bayesian features. They work
wonderfully.
Meanwhile, do you have full access to the SA setup? Or like me are you
and end-user, limited to using just user_prefs?
If you have full access to the SA
Can anybody help?
Any idea how to install SA on SuSE webmailserver 2.0 (Kernel 2.2.16)
using with postfix, ldap-auth
Trying install SA (like on other Servers) with webmin fails.
trying
$#>perl -MCPAN -e shell
shell#> install Mail::SpamAssassin
fails too.
In an other Thread I saw the question f
Hi Bonny,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Bonny wrote:
> As the subject states, I got a false positive on a message sent to me
> from a mailing list.
>
> How do I put that e-mail address into a whitelist?
Simply add the address to your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file in the
following format:
whitelist_f
Hi there. I added a new rulem and ran lint, and this is what I got:
# spamassassin --lint
Failed to run BAYES_90 SpamAssassin test, skipping:
(No write permission to ndbm file at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line
933.
)
Failed to run BAYES_01 SpamAs
How may I check spam that wasn't detected by SA and thus add or adjust
SA to catch those messages too?
Thank you...
--
Bonny - Registered Linux User #251752
--- VB LUG Moderator ---
Computer - A device designed to speed and automate errors.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
In data Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:37:52 -0400
Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
> 1) Use the Bayesian feature of SA so that it can "learn" to
> distinguish spam better.
That would mean to use
use_bayes 1
auto_learn 1
right?
> 2) Instead of blindingly strengtening all rules,
As the subject states, I got a false positive on a message sent to me
from a mailing list.
How do I put that e-mail address into a whitelist?
Thanx...
--
Bonny - Registered Linux User #251752
--- VB LUG Moderator ---
Sex is like software: it's better when it's free!
pgp0.pgp
Descri
Bob Menschel writes:
>AL> Hmm, I understand the idea now. I will argue about positive score
>AL> for unknown signatures, but negative score for signatures in the
>AL> my ~/.gnupg is good
>
>I'd like to see the ability to run such tests. And following SA
>practices, each would be a test with its ow
Ah! many thanks for the BIZ rule!
-t
-
Turgut Kalfaoglu: http://www.kalfaoglu.com
EgeNet Internet Services: http://www.egenet.com.tr
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, P
55 matches
Mail list logo
