On Friday 25 July 2003 11:52 am, Jeff Funk wrote:
> Here's a header of an e-mail I just received. The F'word has been replaced
> with X's. Isn't there a default rule in SA somewhere that would catch
> that? Seems like a pretty obvious nasty to me . . . .
No, such a word is commonly used in non-sexual situations. For instance:
Intranet server tottally XXXXXX up by latest Microsoft worm
If you'll look in rules/20_porn.cf, you'll see that SA's porn rules are
phrases that don't show up that often (if at all) in non-porn messages. For
instance, "must be at least 18" is very unlikely to show up in normal email.
--
Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on
fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Advanced SPAM filtering software: http://spamassassin.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
