Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Are you learning a proportionate amount of ham as well ? [...]
> * Bayes doesn't "learn" particular messages, it learns the statistics
> of the words used in the messages. [...]
None of this addresses the original posted concern: When you feed one
I will be out of the office starting 07/11/2003 and will not return until
07/16/2003.
If this is a technical problem that needs urgent attention. Please e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web app
I will be out of the office starting 07/11/2003 and will not return until
07/16/2003.
If this is a technical problem that needs urgent attention. Please e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web app
At 20:30 13/07/03 -0700, Chris Petersen wrote:
> Whatever I do, sa-learn will not accept it as spam. :(
It takes about 500-1000 learned spams before SA starts marking things
with the bayes filter. I've put at least that many in, and still only
about half of my spams have bayes markings in them (a
> Whatever I do, sa-learn will not accept it as spam. :(
It takes about 500-1000 learned spams before SA starts marking things
with the bayes filter. I've put at least that many in, and still only
about half of my spams have bayes markings in them (and about 10% of my
daily spam still gets throug
On 07/13/03 17:27 -0400, John P Verel wrote:
>
>
> On 07/13/03 13:25 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> >
> > What does your local.cf look like?
> required_hits 5
> rewrite_subject 1
> subject_tag [SPAM]
> report_safe 0
> always_add_report 1
> dns_available test: 167.206.3.216, 167.206.7.4, 167.206
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Why wil "sa-learn" not learn?
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 10:27:54PM +, Mark wrote:
> > asarian-host: {root}
Jason Haar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 07/03/03 at 23:14:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:29:47PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> > So, no rant from me, but I *do* think the list admin (or the admin of
> > the system that hosts the list) should be making every attempt to block
> > viri
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 10:27:54PM +, Mark wrote:
> asarian-host: {root} % /usr/local/sa/bin/sa-learn --spam --mbox -D <
> /temp/spam
Ah. Get rid of that '<'.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Jab, Jab, Oooh. O(n log n)! Ha! Tail recursion! Thrust! Parry! "
- Jim Flanagan
pgp0.
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:20:37 -0600, Dan Jones wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Vanecek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 5:11 PM
> To: spamassassin_list
> Subject: [SAtalk] Reject based on SA score
>
> Running RH 9, SA 2.55 w/spamc/d, Postfix, procmail, ...
>
I have an account on my server for myself and for my wife. There is the
typical /etc/procmailrc to get us started:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
* < 256000
| spamc
I have a recipe in my personal .procmailrc that looks for X-Spam-Flag:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag:
$SUSPECT
The problem is that my wif
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:37:38PM -0400, Greg Cirino wrote:
> bayes is only system wide when using a database
you mean it would be possible already now, if I use
a DB instead of the bayes_ files ?
Sounds good, would also be fine... I'll have a look and
try to find some more docs about that, th
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:38:53PM +, Mark wrote:
>
> > What does it mean, "Learned from 0 messages"?? Should not
> > sa-learn learn from EVERY message you specifically tell it
> > to be spam?
>
> Not if you've already learned it as spam.
The mail had slipped through, so was not marked as sp
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:38:53PM +, Mark wrote:
> What does it mean, "Learned from 0 messages"?? Should not sa-learn learn
> from EVERY message you specifically tell it to be spam?
Not if you've already learned it as spam. a full -D would tell you.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Zebras,
On 07/13/03 13:25 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>
> What does your local.cf look like?
required_hits 5
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [SPAM]
report_safe 0
always_add_report 1
dns_available test: 167.206.3.216, 167.206.7.4, 167.206.112.138
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, running Red Hat 9.0
A spam slipped through, and I tried to have sa-learn (SA 2.55) learn it as
spam:
asarian-host: {root} % /usr/local/sa/bin/sa-learn --spam --mbox -D
/temp/spam
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? no
debug: using "/usr/local/sa/share/spam
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 21:35:04 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote
> ... it's an example of what the new Postfix snapshot with amavisd-
> new as smtp proxy and points-modified SA 2.60-CVS can do.
>
> This is what [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets mailed, every time spam
> is cesspitted. Cesspitting doesn't just mean t
o:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
550 5.7.1 Message content rejected, UBE, id=29685-02
The message has been quarantined as:
/var/amavis/quarantine/spam-20030713-210632-29685-02.gz
SpamAssassin report:
Spam detection software, running on the system "billy.demon.nl", has
identified this
bayes is only system wide when using a database
might be implemented in 2.7x
I asked about this when using 2.50
HTH
Regards
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 2:30 PM
Subject: [SAtalk
Malte S. Stretz wrote:
To make it more clear: You should probably use
dns_available: test: billy.demon.
-> ^
Swapping billy.demon.nl for localhost works too.
Thanks Malte :-)))
Now I've been able to take the MX record out of localhost.zone, phew.
My machine is a dialup (with a
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 09:02, John P Verel wrote:
> Can't figure out now to get SA to re-write headers using Evoluton (my
> wife's MUA), where I'm using the Evolution to pop the mail from my ISP.
> I have it set up in the filters section, where I simply give
> /usr/bin/spamc. SA identifies spam fin
hello,
I'm using SA with a mysql database for a few months, and I
wanted to test the bayes system.
Unfortunately, the spamd is reporting that:
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
SQL server
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: Failed to
I'm using the following command to "feed" SpamAssassin the email messages.
my $status = $spamobj->check_message_text($EmailMessageHeadersAndBodyHere);
The "major" problem I'm having now is that if there are any quote (") marks
anywhere in the message ($EmailMessageHeadersAndBodyHere), then
check_
SA 2.60-CVS, Postfix 2.0.13-20030706 amavisd-new June this year.
*Why does the DNS server have to have an MX record* for SA to approve of
it? Why can't SA just look for a valid DNS server? Or even a valid MX
record for my domain/host?
I have a local caching DNS server. Works perfectly - far bet
Hi Guys,
Here's one that came in under the radar. I have no idea how I got on this
list as I live in the U.S.
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by loca
hello all,
when i invoke spamc from the global procmailrc, each users mail should be
checked against spam using their own tokens (or should it?). but if a user
doesn't have bayes database, sa uses some other users database. is this
normal, or is this just a feature?
thanks,
gokcen
---
Hello
I just installed spam assassin on my computer which is windows xp
and I use netscape for email. It seems to work well but I need to fine
tune it since it considers all mail from a list I run as spam. Can
anyone send me a url that explains how to configure it for netscape, how
to adjust
Can't figure out now to get SA to re-write headers using Evoluton (my
wife's MUA), where I'm using the Evolution to pop the mail from my ISP.
I have it set up in the filters section, where I simply give
/usr/bin/spamc. SA identifies spam fine and filters to the spam folder,
but no change in heade
http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/images/dilbert2003071742312.gif
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproo
Hello,
Is there a safe, and documented, way to backup the Bayes databases? Here
(FreeBSD 4.7R) they reside in:
/usr/home/spamd/.spamassassin/
Mysql, for instance, has a "hotcopy" utility, that ensures the databases are
flushed first. Is there a documented way of doing something similar? I mean,
I have noticed some increased times for processing messages using spamc/spamd.
Setup is: SA 2.55
RH 7.2
Razor2 2.34
I start the daemon with OPTIONS="-d -c -a -H"
And I've been experiencing increased processing times the past week at the
following point:
Jul
31 matches
Mail list logo
