On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:20:37 -0600, Dan Jones wrote > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Vanecek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 5:11 PM > To: spamassassin_list > Subject: [SAtalk] Reject based on SA score > > Running RH 9, SA 2.55 w/spamc/d, Postfix, procmail, ... >
[snip] > Postfix does have an smtp_reject RBL feature. I currently use it with > spamassassin. I prefer to allow all other mail(not rejected) to be scanned > instead of discarding, this allows the end users on my network to either > scan or discard the mail themselves, and I don't get a call that I > am not allowing important business mail through. > > smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_maps_rbl > maps_rbl_domains = dnsbl.njabl.org, relays.osirusoft.com, > bl.spamcop.net, list.\ dsbl.org > > These are the lines from my main.cf > The rejects alone have reduced the amount of spam I scan with spamassassin > by over half. > The setup is also very easy. I have added yours plus a few others: smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_maps_rbl, reject_unknown_client disable_vrfy_command = yes smtpd_helo_required = yes smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_invalid_hostname, reject_unknown_hostname, reject_maps_rbl This should reduce what is being seen by SA significantly. Thank you and the others that replied for their suggestions. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
