I am currently running spamassassin through spamass-milter
in Sendmail. Working pretty good with the following exceptions. I have
several users listed to not have spam blocked using all_spam_to. If a message
is forwarded to them thus they are not apart of the TO, their spam will be
block
At 13:12 8/06/03 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:21 AM +0300 Hannu Liljemark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://world.std.com/~pacman/proxypot.html
He mentions that Perl 5.8 has a memory leak in socketpair. Does SA use
that? That could affect long runs of spamd.
Doesn't
please read the attachment. thanks.Join Excite! - http://www.excite.comThe most personalized portal on the Web!
Hi list,
I have some problems with Qmail and Spamassassin. Please help me.
1) I had tried to configure spamassassin as system-wide. But i keep telling me its
unable to write to /var/
The following article explains how Hotmail now provides a WebDAV interface
which makes it easier to automate issuing spam from Hotmail:
http://www.unicom.com/chrome/a/000262.html
I would like to recommend adding a header check for:
Recieved: .*[.]hotmail[.]com with DAV;
and score it approbat
Jack Gostl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I notice that SAProxy uses version 2.52 of SA. It looks like SA and its
> tests are internal to SAProxy. Is there a way to get it to upgrade?
No, but magic 8-ball says "new version based on SA 2.55 real soon now".
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Dan McDonald wrote:
> Jack Gostl writes:
>
> >> Yup - download the source and perform a manual install, just like
> >> you did with pop3proxy. Better documentation on how to do this is
> >> needed.
> >
> > Where do I get that?
>
> There's no source package just yet, but you
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dan McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Stuart Gall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "SpamAssassin listserve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy
>
> > Yup - download the source a
Do I just use another name with the *.cf extension in the same directory?
Thanks,
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 3:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Multiple Local.cf files
Damian Mendoza wrote on Sat,
--On Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:21 AM +0300 Hannu Liljemark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://world.std.com/~pacman/proxypot.html
He mentions that Perl 5.8 has a memory leak in socketpair. Does SA use
that? That could affect long runs of spamd.
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:50:00PM +0300, Mike Mills wrote:
>
>> I've just upgraded from SpamAssassin version 2.43 to 2.55.
>> I've been using sa-learn to build up the Bayesian database.
>> Still, SpamAssassin doesn't seem to be using the Bayes test.
>
> Run the check_bayes_db script from the SA
Jack Gostl wrote on Sun, 8 Jun 2003 07:03:26 -0400 (EDT):
> Where can I get the current one? I went to the spamassassin.org page and
> wind up directed to an obsolete page, which in turn directs me to a page
> that says pop3proxy is obsolete and has been replaced with SAProxy, which
> utilized "Ut
Tony Earnshaw wrote on Sun, 08 Jun 2003 11:52:29 +0200:
> Duff cvs package?
No ;-)
I found the reason for all the errors, it's the "d" switch. If you export the ENV var,
you don't need it
and it just specifies another empty CVSROOT. So, everything will be successful, but it
will throw errors
Jack Gostl writes:
>> Yup - download the source and perform a manual install, just like
>> you did with pop3proxy. Better documentation on how to do this is
>> needed.
>
> Where do I get that?
There's no source package just yet, but you can check out the
individual files via anonymous CVS from t
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 02:50:51PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Make use of DNSBLs and/or RDBNLs.
Thanks for your comprehensive responses to my original question. Just the
quality of advice I was hoping for - I'll take it!
Regards: Jim Ford
--
Don't use this address! ---> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:50:00PM +0300, Mike Mills wrote:
> I've just upgraded from SpamAssassin version 2.43 to 2.55.
> I've been using sa-learn to build up the Bayesian database.
> Still, SpamAssassin doesn't seem to be using the Bayes test.
Run the check_bayes_db script from the SA tarball's
Peter McGarvey wrote:
I work for an ISP. Last week I had to deal with three corporate
customers who had decided to install teergrube. They all though they
were getting a little bit more pro-active about dealing with spammers.
The only problem with this is they all receive their mail via SMTP
rel
* Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-06-08 11:26:05 BST]:
> Jim Ford wrote:
>
> >Now I've got SA working well (thanks NG!), I'd really like to do something
> >to hit or at least cause some inconvenience to spammers, rather than just
> >passively dump spam. Devin Carraway's Sugarplum spam pois
Jim Ford wrote:
If you have the bandwidth and if you really want to satisfy your ego,
consider teergrubing/tar pitting using an appropriate MTA such as Exim
4, SA-Exim 3.0, Postfix 2.0 or suchlike.
I'd heard of tar pitting - it's an attractive idea. I just feel that as
spammers are putting me t
Hi,
When spam slips through and I do 'spamassassin -r' to feed it to Razor and
the Bayes DB, is there any point in saving it? I've been saving it up to now
so I can feed it to sa-learn.
Regards: Jim Ford
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
theVSP.com, Inc. wrote:
Sir or Madam,
Sir.
DO NOT WORRY... If you are using an existing email address bearing the "thevsp.com" extension, your message is being forwarded to our new email address automatically.
I am tho pleathed. You have *no idea* how worried I wath. Even though I
wathn't uthin
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:49:10AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> If you have the bandwidth and if you really want to satisfy your ego,
> consider teergrubing/tar pitting using an appropriate MTA such as Exim
> 4, SA-Exim 3.0, Postfix 2.0 or suchlike.
I'd heard of tar pitting - it's an attractiv
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Jack Gostl wrote on Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:32:05 -0400 (EDT):
>
> > I've got pop3proxy from a site called perlmonk. Not sure if its
> > "official"
> >
>
> That's the old name of SAproxy, you shouldn't use it, it's possibly an old
> version.
Where can I get
Damian Mendoza wrote on Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:39:29 -0700:
> Is it possible to have a second local.cf file?
>
The name of the file doesn't matter, you can have 1.000 if you want.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center:
Jack Gostl wrote on Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:32:05 -0400 (EDT):
> I've got pop3proxy from a site called perlmonk. Not sure if its
> "official"
>
That's the old name of SAproxy, you shouldn't use it, it's possibly an old
version.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Intern
Sir or Madam,
With the recent change of business names from theVSP.com, Inc. to Virtual Solution
Partners, LLC, we have removed all previous email accounts bearing the "thevsp.com"
extension.
DO NOT WORRY... If you are using an existing email address bearing the "thevsp.com"
extension, your me
Gary Funck wrote:
Hmmm, So if I go here, http://spamassassin.rediris.es/downloads.html
and pick up the "Latest bleeding-edge code, 2.60", am I getting the
latest SA, *and* its latest scores? If I install this package, and
replace my previous package, and don't muck things up in my local.cf,
do I h
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I'm getting the 2.60 cvs after having initialized it with this recommended script now:
export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/spamassassin
cvs login
cvs update -Pd
cvs logout
It sort of works and updates everything, but I'm getting these irritating errors:
Logging
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Hi, your posting is more or less unreadable because of the weird
formatting, please consider using a decent mail program and remailing your
questions and please consider not to use HTML. You may also want to put a
name in the appropriate field instead of just nothing.
Just f
Jim Ford wrote:
Now I've got SA working well (thanks NG!), I'd really like to do something
to hit or at least cause some inconvenience to spammers, rather than just
passively dump spam. Devin Carraway's Sugarplum spam poisoner look an
interesting option, does anyone use it or have opinions on it,
L. Walsh wrote:
So far, I'm told there is nothing anyone can do to turn this off unless it
is turned off for all users.
Needless to say, I am complaining vociferously, so far, to no avail.
Time to change ISPs? I'm a dial up customer, though blessed with choice
in that field (Holland is a small, t
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 03:08:00PM +0300, Jim Ford wrote:
> I'd really like to do something to hit or at least cause
> some inconvenience to spammers, rather than just passively
> dump spam. Devin Carraway's Sugarplum spam poisoner look
> an interesting option, does anyone use it or have
> opinion
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:21:00PM +0300, MisterM wrote:
> is it possible to delete or move messages based on the
> spam level or tag by spamassassin itself? I know you
> can do it with the clients but that's no option for the
> company here. Have you got any idea's to do this??
Not with SpamAssa
32 matches
Mail list logo
