Dr. Martinus wrote:
> I tried running
>
> "spamassassin -t -L sample-spam.txt"
>
> from within the directory where sample-spam.txt resides. Nothing
> happens, i.e. it appears as if something is going on, but it takes
> too long (several minutes), so I hit Ctrl-C to stop it. What could be
> wrong?
Hi,
I used the RPM spamassassin-2.20-1.i586.rpm to install SA. I'm used to
the GUI stuff, so I was assuming that I do not have to do anything
else. I set the filter in KMail as it should be, and find that SA
isn't checking anything (or just lets every spam message get
through). I received ton
If I recall correctly, up until a couple months ago it was just Vipul
doing all the work. When he brought in someone else, they saw a
potential product for the market place and spent the last month or so
quitting their jobs and setting up a biz. At the same time, they
completely rewrote razor.
Huh??? What file are you talking about. Every home dir gets a
.spamassassin folder for keeping whitelists, etc. Really you shouldn't
need to do anything. If spamassassin is called under their credentials
then the .spamassassin prefs get created.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Smith [m
I did this yesterday on my test box. I have separate incoming and
outgoing sendmail queues. If I invoke procmail from within sendmail as
a delivery agent, then procmail drop the message in my incoming mail
queue and it gets processed a second time before being sent on to the
final remote destina
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 07:29:02PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > I'll attach a patch to a bugzilla report if I figure it out.
>
> The problem is it doesn't work at all
It worked, but only for messages that actually did mention ebay in the
headers
Lars Hansson wrote:
> Eh, shouting down? Matt Perry's message is anything but constructive.
> I'd be pretty pissed off too if someone tried to tell me how to do my
> job and basicly accused me of being incompetent.
*Releasing* a version of razor which fails to actually check spam
(http://www.geoc
Hello Rose, Bobby. On 6/24/02 11:09 PM, from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
wrote:
> Don't know anything about Communigate Pro but SA preferenses are in the
> home dir that is specified in /etc/passwd for that particular user.
Bobby, do you rename the file to that user's email address or what? The docs
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 08:18:10PM -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> Anybody seen this happen before?
Somehow, you've got spamassassin invoked twice on its way through your
mail stream.
--
Duncan Findlay
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://
Hey guys -
I've noticed that SA is tagging things twice...and sometimes each
"group" has different results. This particular example, they're both the
same. I can't figure out why it's doing this. Here's an example:
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results --
Don't know anything about Communigate Pro but SA preferenses are in the
home dir that is specified in /etc/passwd for that particular user.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] User Pref
I didn't get an answer to this. Can anyone help?
When we copy the user's preferences to their directory, does that mean their
Communigate Pro user directory? Or do we have to create a user for them on
the system?
Kindest regards,
Ron
---
Sp
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 07:29:02PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> The problem is still with the from_domain_in_received caching, somehow.
> I'll attach a patch to a bugzilla report if I figure it out.
The problem is it doesn't work at all (I can't even figure out was
meant) I just commented out
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 11:20:03PM -0700, M. Brownsworth wrote:
> Slap me and call me Sally if I'm wrong, but it looks to me from the
> results that the "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" entry in
> local.cf has no effect whatsoever on spamc's filtering. One good
> thing: spamc doesn't die when
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 19:13:32 -0400
"rODbegbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should also be pointed out that Razor2 doesn't work yet. Vipul & co are
> taking the somewhat amateurish approach of releasing barely-tested code (and
> shouting down people on their mailing list who are making constr
t/nonspam...FAILED test 1
Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay
And the reason for the failure?
SPAM: FORGED_EBAY_RCVD (5.0 points) 'From' ebay.com does not match 'Received'
headers
Needless to say there's NOTHING about ebay in the file t/d
hello,
i got qmail-scanner with SA 2.20 working on my mailserver
i got header information on new written email, which tells me, that is spam.
-
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by server by uid 532 with qmail-scanner-1.12 (spamassassin: 2.20. . Clear:SA:1(32.2/10.0):. Processe
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> As someone else stated, 2.3x doesn't support Razor2 yet (although
> patches are available via Bugzilla). SA doesn't look for the razor-*
> programs, it calls the modules directly. When you installed Razor2
> it didn't get rid of the Razor1 modules, and they're named
> di
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 02:24:56PM -0700, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> I have version 2 of razor installed yet spamassassin seems to be using
> version 1.2. I can't even figure out where it is finding a copy of
> version 1 on my system so I'm not able to remove the binary to get it to
> use version 2
Title: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found or matched file blocking setting.
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [SAtalk
plan%20site[1].htm
Description: Binary data
The current release doesn't use v2 of razor. The changelog was
incorrect. SA 2.40 does use it but it shouldn't be used on production
yet. When I installed it on my test box, every message was tagged as
spam because of the Ebay_Forged rule.
-Original Message-
From: Jefferson Cowart [mai
http://www.salon.com/tech/col/leon/2002/06/24/spam_assassin/index.html
--
Simon Lyall.| Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz
--
I have version 2 of razor installed yet spamassassin seems to be using
version 1.2. I can't even figure out where it is finding a copy of
version 1 on my system so I'm not able to remove the binary to get it to
use version 2. Does spamassassin do anything odd in locating razor? I
only find one cop
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> Noone in their right mind would trust SPEWS directly, the problem is
> people trust Spam Assassin, and Spam Assassin uses
> relays.osirusoft.com
> with enough weight to kill an email--
Someone quoted this very same mail in my ISP's mail newsgroup. Note the
blantant ina
My brother sent this to me and I thought I'd pass it on here since it seems
relevant. Personally I don't use the blacklists because I don't want the
extra network overhead/slowdowns but some of you may.
Regards,
Andrew
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Fwd: Re: SPEWS?
Date:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:06:27PM -0500, Christopher Crowley wrote:
| How do I configure spamd to do this? I don't see it off hand. Is it
| possible to configure Spamassassin to do this, or do I need to hack
| it to make this work?
subject_tag ***SA:_HITS_***
-D
--
"...In the UNIX w
I have implemented SA on a site wide configuration.
My scripts show that spam is being detected and loged but...
My email is not being marked up with the spamassassin details.
What I want is for the email to continue to the recipient with the marked up
spamassassin details.
How do I configure th
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:06:27PM -0500, Christopher Crowley wrote:
> How do I configure spamd to do this? I don't see it off hand. Is it
> possible to configure Spamassassin to do this, or do I need to hack
> it to make this work?
$ man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
...
subject_tag STRING ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How do I configure spamd to do this? I don't see it off hand. Is it
possible to configure Spamassassin to do this, or do I need to hack
it to make this work?
Thanks in advance.
Christopher Crowley
TIS Network Services
Tulane University
[EMAIL PROTEC
home&garden;sz=468x60;tile=1;ord=5306489120[1].htm
Description: Binary data
Weyland wrote:
> I've installed SA with MIMEDefang, and have
> a problem that I'm not sure how to figure out.
>
> Too, I can use the test of " spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt >
> nonspam.out" and see that it works by viewing the resulting file.
>
> How can I diagnose what the problem is?
Ha
On Monday 24 June 2002 16:04 CET Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Thorsten Haude wrote:
> > The 'make install' fails after that, and I don't want to force it.
>
> Which perl version was used for this? I believe everything below version
> 5.6.0 can cause problems.
I've got the same tests failing with Perl 5.6
Hi guys,
I've installed SA with MIMEDefang, and have
a problem that I'm not sure how to figure out.
I've tried searching the archives, but it doesn't seem
to be available to me here at work for whatever reason.
(I got through twice, but didn't find anything)
As well, I've read the docsI could
When we copy the user's preferences to their directory, does that mean their
Communigate Pro user directory? Or do we have to create a user for them on
the system?
Kindest regards,
Ron
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
We get a lot of spam that matches the rule below. I think I may have sent
this one along once before, but I've just updated it to match a few more
phrasing variations.
body SEARCH_ENGINE_PROMO
/\b(?:(?:submitt?|list)(?:ed|ing|s)?|place(?:d|ment))\s+.{0,15}\b(?:in|to)\b.{0,15}\b(?:(?:top
Thorsten Haude wrote:
> The 'make install' fails after that, and I don't want to force it.
Which perl version was used for this? I believe everything below version
5.6.0 can cause problems.
ciao
Klaus
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http
I have a non-root install and I get errors like this when doing a make
opendir(./../../..): Permission denied at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Pod/Html.pm line 784
and when I run spamassassin I get:
opendir(/home/primco/bin/SpamAssassin//../../..): Permission denied at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/FindBin.pm li
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 09:53:44PM -0400, Ron Smith wrote:
| I was wondering if it is common practice to do a glabal whitelist entry for
| any postmaster-from address since it would be possible to get into a loop
| with rejected email?
Reject messages are "Delivery Status Notification" messages a
I'm going to shut off PARTIAL_RFC_2369 in my local.cf ...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *SPAM* I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-imapext-thread-10.txt
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 07:48:28 -0400
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.9 required=5.0
tests=TO_MALFORMED,NO_REAL_NAME,EXCUSE_6,DOUBLE_CAPSWORD,
hello,
i got qmail-scanner with SA 2.20 working on my mailserver
i got header information on new written email, which tells me, that is spam.
-
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by server by uid 532 with qmail-scanner-1.12 (spamassassin: 2.20. . Clear:SA:1(32.2/10.0):. Processed
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 07:10:57AM -0400, Eric L. Santelices wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 01:58, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>
> Sorry the one item I forgot to add to the email was that I do NOT see
> the X-SPAM-FLAG in the headers in ANY of the emails.
>
Well, if you DO NOT see something like
X
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 01:58, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
Sorry the one item I forgot to add to the email was that I do NOT see
the X-SPAM-FLAG in the headers in ANY of the emails.
> Hi again, Eric :o)
>
> On Monday 24 June 2002 03:36 CET you wrote:
> > I have spamassassin setup in a sitewide config
43 matches
Mail list logo
