[SAtalk] Re: Sieve and SpamAssassin

2002-05-22 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Paul Bauer wrote: > I have been poking through the list and through google and haven't had > any luck with configureing SpamAssassin to work with sieve and cyrus. I think you are trying to hook SA in far too late in the process if either Cyrus or Sieve are involved... > Is t

[SAtalk] Sieve and SpamAssassin

2002-05-22 Thread Paul Bauer
I have been poking through the list and through google and haven't had any luck with configureing SpamAssassin to work with sieve and cyrus. Is there a how-to or a page with a few suggestions that someone can point me to? Thank you, Paul -- # #Microso

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Tracking

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Mark Martinec wrote: MM> Matt, MM> MM> | Unfortunately that's not strictly true. MM> | MM> | You could very easily poison the database using short english phrases. I MM> | see an awful lot of emails that just contain single words, such as: MM> | "Hello???" or "How did it go?" etc. Generating thin

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.20 install failure

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Looks like all your network tests are breaking. Did you install a firewall or something? 2.20 works fine for me on 10.1.4, as does current CVS. C Fred Inklaar wrote: FI> op 18-05-2002 22:35 schreef Sarwat Khan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): FI> FI> > I haven't been unable to get 2.20 to install properl

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Grading Information as attachment

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Daniel Quinlan wrote: DQ> Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DQ> DQ> > Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to DQ> > SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integrating it yet. It's DQ> > just a matter of setting the content-type to multipart/mixed, and set D

Re: [SAtalk] How to log SA Stats

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
spamd logs quite a bit of information through syslog using the "mail" facility -- check your mail log files for lines looking like: May 22 18:15:05 belphegore spamd[25363]: clean message (-0.5/5.0) for craig:500 in 0 seconds. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How do you log stats on SA? I know stat

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Grading Information as attachment

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Bugzilla #317 and #18 refer to this. #317 includes a patch which needs some work to integrate it into CVS. Matt, do you want to take this one? C Matt Sergeant wrote: MS> Ed Ames wrote: MS> >Has any thought been given to formatting the SpamAssassin "grading MS> > information" as a legit at

Re: [SAtalk] Install Help, please

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Jonathan Allen wrote: JA> > /bin/sh: pod2text: command not found JA> What do I do next ? Install perl properly, and/or make sure pod2text is in your path. The pod2text stuff is just creating the docs, so if you don't care about docs, you can ignore these errors. C _

Re: [SAtalk] HTTP_CTRL_CHARS_HOST

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Matt Sergeant wrote: MS> Also, if you're going to fix this we need tests to show that the fix MS> does indeed work. See other tests that I've written in the rules files. See my bugzilla comment about tests in this case -- we should break them out to a separate .cf file probably since they'll con

Re: [SAtalk] One detected as -67 points??

2002-05-22 Thread Duncan Findlay
> DQ> Also, it seems like we're lacking a good way to whitelist addresses > DQ> found in our own outgoing email in addition to incoming email. One > DQ> could Cc: oneself and have procmail pipe to "spamassassin -W" option, > DQ> but I only want messages in the To: or Cc: to be added. > > Well, t

Re: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd not working with -a ...

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Is your home directory mounted via NFS? C Skip Montanaro wrote: SM> debug: 31245 Trying to get lock on /home/skip/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist pass 22 ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August

Re: [SAtalk] One detected as -67 points??

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Daniel Quinlan wrote: DQ> Craig R Hughes writes: DQ> DQ> > The right way is actually to have the AWL form a prediction based on a DQ> > more sophisticated predictive model, including a zero-frequency DQ> > estimate for senders who are not in the whitelist. The weight DQ> > provided by the AWL in

Re: [SAtalk] botched MIME tests?

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Daniel Quinlan wrote: DQ> Craig R Hughes writes: DQ> DQ> > full MIME_SUSPECT eval:mime_suspect('/path/to/mime.types') DQ> DQ> I looked at those MIME types that tended to be connected to unsolicited DQ> email (spam and viruses) or generally frequent and hard-coded those DQ> types. I also

Re: [SAtalk] Out of Office AutoReply: [elektrosmog] Nordic DeveloperBriefing Invitation (fwd)

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: TLS> I know it's GA-evolved, but isn't the score (2.741) for SUBJ_HAS_SPACES TLS> uncalled for when we're just talking about "linebreakingspaces", indenting the TLS> continued subject-line...? TLS> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=4.5 tests=SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,

RE: [SAtalk] problem with load of triplets.txt?

2002-05-22 Thread Neulinger, Nathan
> > NN> This code: > > NN> > > NN> if (!$triplets_loaded) { > > NN> my $filename = $self->{main}->{rules_filename} . > > NN> "/triplets.txt"; > > NN> > > NN> if (!open (TRIPLETS, "<$filename")) { > > NN> dbg ("failed to open '$filename', cannot check > dictionary"); > > NN>

Re: [SAtalk] SMTPD32

2002-05-22 Thread Charlie Watts
On Wed, 22 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > spam Hit! (1.3 points) Received via SMTPD32 server (SMTPD32-n.n) > > could someone please explain why the "SMTPD32 server" is a spam hit? Lots of spam comes through systems running that mail server software. Note that 1.3 isn't anywhere near the

[SAtalk] A pointer for nailing Korean based spam

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Baker
My company is both in Korea and in Canada, so we tend to get a lot of collateral spam from Korean spamhouses AND legitimate mail. One point I haven't seen yet in the ruleset is that there's a law in Korea that UCE (or perhaps even UBE) must have a subject header denoting it. I don't read/spea

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin Pop Proxy v1.2

2002-05-22 Thread Nick Fisher
For those few that care SAPP v1.2 is working and stable. The main new feature is that it skips messages over a variable size (prevents timeouts) AND a Readme to explain (badly) how to use it. Get it here http://nickdafish.com/SAPP-Light.Zip For those of you who don't know what it is... SAPP is a

[SAtalk] Changes to conf not affecting spamd

2002-05-22 Thread Cheng-Jih Chen
I've put the following into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: header FROM_RWC_NET Received =~ /from randomwalk.com/ describe FROM_RWC_NET From RWC internal network score FROM_RWC_NET -100 Basically, a white list for connections made for internal mail. The problem is that spamd doesn

Re: [SAtalk] configuring default SA behavior

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Baker
On May 22, 2002 11:46 am, Jason Baker wrote: > Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to make > SpamAssassin pay any attention to default configuration settings. > > I'm using spamassassin from an RPM (spamassassin-2.20-1), and have tried > adding config options into /etc/mai

[SAtalk] configuring default SA behavior

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Baker
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to make SpamAssassin pay any attention to default configuration settings. I'm using spamassassin from an RPM (spamassassin-2.20-1), and have tried adding config options into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, into /etc/spamassassin/use

[SAtalk] upgrade path

2002-05-22 Thread Ron Nau
can someone confirm that the upgrade path from 2.01 to 2.20 is simply to install again?  I can't find any mention of upgrading in the source or documentation (other than the Makefile warning that uninstall is deprecated) but can't find any reason not to re-install   it would appear that any

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd from daemontools

2002-05-22 Thread John Gaughan
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Dallas Engelken wrote: > Anyone run spamd from daemontools? When I try and > exec /usr/bin/spamd -d -F0 > > it forks off, and then I get readproctile erros. When I try and > exec /usr/bin/spamd -F0 > > everything is peachy, spamd binds to port 783 and all, but spamc can

[SAtalk] SMTPD32

2002-05-22 Thread spamreg
spam Hit! (1.3 points) Received via SMTPD32 server (SMTPD32-n.n) could someone please explain why the "SMTPD32 server" is a spam hit? why should the owner of the SMTPD32 server do? ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Devel

RE: [SAtalk] Spamd from daemontools

2002-05-22 Thread Dallas Engelken
> I use > > exec /usr/bin/spamd -q -x -D -L -u vpopmail 2>&1 | > /usr/local/bin/multilog t > s100 /var/log/spamd > Are you able to send # svc -d /service/spamd and shut down the daemon? when I try, it is still bound to port 783. I have to send a TERM to it to after svc -d. svc -u sta

RE: [SAtalk] Spamd from daemontools

2002-05-22 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Dallas Engelken > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Spamd from daemontools > > > Anyone run spamd from daemontools? When I try and > exec /usr/bin/spamd -d -F0 > > it forks off, and then I get readproctile

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd from daemontools

2002-05-22 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, I use exec /usr/bin/spamd -q -x -D -L -u vpopmail 2>&1 | /usr/local/bin/multilog t s100 /var/log/spamd Regards, Rick - Original Message - From: "Dallas Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:35 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Spamd from dae

Re: [SAtalk] Procmail recipe help needed

2002-05-22 Thread dman
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:16:11AM -0500, Brian wrote: | Got SA working well, killer app, Thanks! | | I'm sending all spam to an account designed just for spam, where mail is | looked over for any false positives(?). ... | I'm thinking I don't even need to clutter my "eye-balling" in this mailbo

[SAtalk] Spamd from daemontools

2002-05-22 Thread Dallas Engelken
Anyone run spamd from daemontools? When I try and exec /usr/bin/spamd -d -F0 it forks off, and then I get readproctile erros. When I try and exec /usr/bin/spamd -F0 everything is peachy, spamd binds to port 783 and all, but spamc cant talk to it. Check out the following... --

Re: *****SPAM***** [SAtalk] rule/score goodness

2002-05-22 Thread Craig R Hughes
Daniel Quinlan wrote: DQ> If a positively-scored rule matches a spam, it's goodness goes up by DQ> its score, but if it matches a non-spam, it's goodness goes down by DQ> its score. The inverse is true for negatively-scored rules. You can DQ> weight false-positives if you want (I didn't in the

[SAtalk] One small rule change and one proposed new rule

2002-05-22 Thread Shayne Hardesty
The two spams below slipped by virtually unscathed under my 2.20 installation (I'm not using razor or DCC, so maybe those would have caught them).. I modified CLICK_HERE_LINK of 20_body_tests.cf to catch dashes and underscores between the words "click" and "here": rawbody CLICK_HERE_LINK

Re: [SAtalk] Procmail recipe help needed

2002-05-22 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Brian wrote: > I can use some help with a recipe or any suggestion to accomplish (hopr > you get the idea here)... > :0 > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes > {B > * ^SPAM: Hit! (3.0 points) Listed in Razor* > /dev/null > } > {B > * ^SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points) Received via a relay in

[SAtalk] Procmail recipe help needed

2002-05-22 Thread Brian
Got SA working well, killer app, Thanks! I'm sending all spam to an account designed just for spam, where mail is looked over for any false positives(?). Have the whitelist configured properly, can send what FEW emails marked as spam back to the user (usually my fault, updating the whitelist fix

Re: [SAtalk] /root/.spamassassin

2002-05-22 Thread David T-G
Alan -- ...and then Stanier, Alan M said... % % I am trying to run SpamAssassin with MailScanner and Exim, which must be a % common scenario Probably so. % % When I start it up, I get the error message % mkdir /root/.spamassassin: Permission denied at % /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Mail/Sp

Re: [SAtalk] One Last Question Before I Start Installing SpamAssassin...

2002-05-22 Thread David T-G
Jim -- ...and then Jim Hale said... % % I've decided that until I get comfortable with running SA as a system-wide % util, I'm going to set it up for individuals on my EMail server (there's only 5 % so copying the files needed shouldn't be a big hassle) - anyway - is there a Note that you ca

RE: [SAtalk] RULES File For rpm version

2002-05-22 Thread Jim Hale
Found it! Thanks! :) Jim Hale --- Jim & Kathy's Website Collection http://hale.dyndns.org > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Ron Carter > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:05 PM > To: Jim Hale > Cc: Mailing List - Spam Assassin > Sub

Re: [SAtalk] problem with load of triplets.txt?

2002-05-22 Thread Tobias von Koch
On Wed, 22 May 2002 11:08:29 +0200, Tobias von Koch wrote: TVK> Yes, this option seems not to be in the current CVS .cf files. TVK> TVK> But do we really need an extra option for the path of this file? TVK> triplets.txt normally is in one of the standard rules directories TVK> (/usr/share/spama

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Grading Information as attachment

2002-05-22 Thread Matt Sergeant
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Tue, 21 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write: > > >>Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > > >>> The problem with that is, of course, that it messes up existing MIME... >>>meaning that people will bitch about not having the cake and eating it at the >>>same time, or s

Re: [SAtalk] problem with load of triplets.txt?

2002-05-22 Thread Matthew Cline
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 02:08 am, Tobias von Koch wrote: > On Tue, 21 May 2002 12:06:06 -0500, Neulinger, Nathan wrote: > > NN> > NN> This code: > NN> > NN> if (!$triplets_loaded) { > NN> my $filename = $self->{main}->{rules_filename} . > NN> "/triplets.txt"; > NN> > NN> if (!open (

Re: [SAtalk] problem with load of triplets.txt?

2002-05-22 Thread Tobias von Koch
On Tue, 21 May 2002 12:06:06 -0500, Neulinger, Nathan wrote: NN> NN> This code: NN> NN> if (!$triplets_loaded) { NN> my $filename = $self->{main}->{rules_filename} . NN> "/triplets.txt"; NN> NN> if (!open (TRIPLETS, "<$filename")) { NN> dbg ("failed to open '$filename', can

[SAtalk] /root/.spamassassin

2002-05-22 Thread Stanier, Alan M
I am trying to run SpamAssassin with MailScanner and Exim, which must be a common scenario When I start it up, I get the error message mkdir /root/.spamassassin: Permission denied at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 614 This is presumably because MailScanner is set to run