What user are you running spamd as?
If you are running it as root (so that users can control their options
themselves) then you'll need to do 2 things.
1. create the .spamassassin directory for root so that it can lock files
etc (I'm actually not totally sure this is nessessary but I did it an
I don't think using -c and -x means much. You are disabling per user
config files with -x but wanting to create them if they don't exist.
Using -a in this case you will get a site-wide auto-whitelist, your
error is occuring because the user id of spamd doesn't have write
permissions where it'
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:05:21PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Uhoh, since when did they start using the 80.0.0.0 netblock? Your email was
> slamming against my firewall for the last 2 days...
Be wary of blocking networks because they're listed as "unassigned".
I found a firewall at a client
I was wondering about things like this. As I understand it, each of the
rules are scored individually based on how many times they occur in the
corpus. Are the rules combined in anyway.
What I'm saying is, shouldn't seeing an unsubscribe in an email count a
whole lot less if the header isn't
Uhoh, since when did they start using the 80.0.0.0 netblock? Your email was
slamming against my firewall for the last 2 days...
C
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s1.uklinux.net (mail.uklinux.net [80.84.72.21])
by belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA10
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Current CVS supports a -S option, which means "stop
> at threshold", which does what you want.
Perfect!
> What if the (omitted) later tests would actually
mark
> down (score negative)?
If you know the lower bound for each test, you could
skip only the ones that couldn't
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns2141
Some folks are going to use Razor to distribute spam signatures, and a
SpamAssasin like system to check mail for spam characteristics and feed
likely mail into the Razor system.
--
Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a matc
> So... to report the original spam to razor, I have to unmunge this whole
> mess. Sigh...
>
> Miles
There are often reasons to not report spam to razor. This might just be one
of those situations.
--
Duncan Findlay
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing li
Hello folks,
I'd like to get SA running on a Cobalt Qube 3. Right now, I'm attempting to configure
it just for a test account instead of experimenting on the whole domain at once.
That's a good thing, b/c whenever I enable the .forward file in my account, I get this:
The original message was
Dan,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Daniel Liston wrote:
> Here is another idea, and requires monitoring, but is easier than
> trying to unmunge a majordomo bounce to a spammer;
>
> /etc/aliases
> majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo",filename
>
> Filename is actually an archive of all message
Here is another idea, and requires monitoring, but is easier than
trying to unmunge a majordomo bounce to a spammer;
/etc/aliases
majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo",filename
Filename is actually an archive of all messages sent to the
majordomo address.
Dan Liston
Miles Fidelman
Theo,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> majordomo doesn't actually change anything. the bounce is essentially a new message
>with the old
> message as the body. so you could do something like this:
>
> perl -nle 'next if (1../^\s*$/) or /^>From /; print;' < bounce > fresh
>
> > So.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:55:26PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> - strip off both the spamassassin markup (easy - pipe through spamassassin
> -d), AND...
or tell SA to not filter majordomo bounce mails
> - remove the stuff that majordomo changes (headers, BOUNCE info, etc.)
majordomo doesn't a
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:09:10AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Almost for certain it's a file permissions problem. Check that /etc/mail
> /etc/mail/spamassassin and /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf are readable by the
> process that spamd is running as. Generally, there's absolutely no reaso
Yes, you need to restart spamd after system-wide config changes. Only per-user
config files are read when processing each individual message.
C
Nevin Kapur wrote:
NK> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 14:14:07 -0400
NK> From: Nevin Kapur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NK> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NK> Cc: [EMAIL PROTE
Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Almost for certain it's a file permissions problem. Check that /etc/mail
> /etc/mail/spamassassin and /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf are readable by the
> process that spamd is running as. Generally, there's absolutely no reason not
> to make the
Nevin,
Almost for certain it's a file permissions problem. Check that /etc/mail
/etc/mail/spamassassin and /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf are readable by the
process that spamd is running as. Generally, there's absolutely no reason not
to make the directories 755 and the .cf file 644
C
Ne
Hi,
I'm trying to change the default behavior of SpamAssassin by adding
the following rules to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
rewrite_subject 0
report_header 1
use_terse_report1
defang_mime 0
However these options are not being honored. If I add the same
To any of you gurus who understand both majordomo and spamassassin:
I run several small email lists that people try to spam every once in a
while. The general result is that:
- 1. majordomo bounces the spam, because it doesn't come from a list
member
- 2. spamassassin catches the bounce message
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 08:16, Robert Leonard wrote:
> Is there any way to use SpamAssassin in cooperation with Microsoft Exchange
> Server? My company uses MS Exchange Server exclusively for mail, I'd love
> to sit a linux box in front of it to catch all the spam and forward on the
> real mail.
Charlie Watts wrote:
CW> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:31:02 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)
CW> From: Charlie Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CW> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CW> Subject: [SAtalk] AWL as loophole
CW>
CW> I may have posted about this yesterday, but if so - I don't see that I
CW> did.
CW>
CW> I'm
I've just installed spamassassin with sendmail-8.12.3 and
spamass-milter-0.1.1 and large attachments are blocking (they actually end up
sending the attachment on every attempt by the client -- but the client
(both Outlook Express and Outlook) timeout and spamass-milter processes keep
I may have posted about this yesterday, but if so - I don't see that I
did.
I'm starting to get more and more spam that is From: and To: my address.
This stuff is ending up in my Inbox because the AWL loves me. It would
otherwise be tagged.
It has been discussed before, a bit - a way to short-ci
On Tuesday 09 Apr 2002 5:20 pm, Nick Rothwell wrote:
> > Current CVS supports a -S option, which means "stop at threshold", which
> > does what you want.
>
> What if the (omitted) later tests would actually mark down (score
> negative)?
Oh man, why didn't I think of that!
:-)
--
Matt.
<:->get
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 12:20, Nick Rothwell wrote:
> > Current CVS supports a -S option, which means "stop at threshold", which does
> > what you want.
>
> What if the (omitted) later tests would actually mark down (score negative)?
>
If you are going to use -S, you should probably make sure tha
> Current CVS supports a -S option, which means "stop at threshold", which does
> what you want.
What if the (omitted) later tests would actually mark down (score negative)?
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforg
> Odd, this same spam scores 4.8 on my machine.
Hmm, I just got another one, headers as follows. As you can see, I'm
on SA 2.11.
X-Coding-System: iso-8859-1-unix
Mail-from: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 09 14:22:01 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTE
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 08:16, Robert Leonard wrote:
> Is there any way to use SpamAssassin in cooperation with Microsoft Exchange
> Server? My company uses MS Exchange Server exclusively for mail, I'd love
> to sit a linux box in front of it to catch all the spam and forward on the
> real mail.
A couple people liked the graph I produced that other day and asked
for info, so here it is.
In .procmailrc *after SA has touched the mail* I added:
--
SPAM_STATUS=`grep X-Spam-Status $i |cut -d' ' -f3|cut -d'=' -f2 |sort -n`
MESSAGE_ID=`formail -xMessage-ID:: \
| sed -e 's/[;\`\\]/ /g' \
| expan
Fixed.
C
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 20:12, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> In 20_body_tests.cf in the latest CVS:
>
> > describe NO_COSTNo suck thing as a free lunch (3)
>
>
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://l
File a bugzilla ticket on it. If I'm bored one day, I'll do it just to
get everyone to stop complaining about it :)
C
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 21:13, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> * Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020408 23:05]:
> >
> >
> > I used postgresql, wasn't a problem, but you have to re-do the tab
Olivier Nicole wrote:
>
> > Describe PURE_PROFIT Profit is dirty, not pure.
>
> I avoid such jokes in French translation, becaus eI am not sure it
> would be perceived well by all French speaking communities.
Not to mention the impact the joke had here:
http://www.talkbiz.com/assassin.html>.
-
Hi
> Describe PURE_PROFIT Profit is dirty, not pure.
I avoid such jokes in French translation, becaus eI am not sure it
would be perceived well by all French speaking communities.
I think that those describe could change when SA become more mature.
> However, I do agree that many tests descri
On Tuesday 09 Apr 2002 6:05 am, Gus Oakfield wrote:
> SpamAssassin currently (v2.11) performs all tests on
> each message, even when it's clear early on that a
> message will be classified as spam. Some tests (most
> notably the network tests) are quite slow. A single
> message can take 20-30 se
34 matches
Mail list logo
