--nextPart1363185.08MqPojujD
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
On Saturday 12 February 2005 10.00, Ramius wrote:
> I put the complete log of my operations at this address (gzipped):
> http://ramius.spymac.n
--nextPart3407380.ATerDdcSJb
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
> On Wednesday 09 February 2005 19:24, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:39, Vitaly Lipatov wrote:
> > > I try to get
--nextPart7111386.C1ONHCfveq
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thursday 17 February 2005 11.36, Ramius wrote:
> >It seems that the scanner doesn't understand the quality
> > calibration command. You can disa
--nextPart2852017.aKkNFnedWP
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
> I'd like to help and I've got the scanner working on an old Win 98
> box I had lying around so how do I get the USB trace and who do I
> send it t
--nextPart3676092.hI29GJBUPW
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
> i actually found out i have no scsi-controller. i had attached my
> scanner to the parallel port, believing it was scsi. the fact is i
> was use
Hi,
> - "scanimage > /tmp/junkimage.bin" gives me :
>
> [snapscan] Scanner warming up - waiting 9 seconds.
> [snapscan] Scanner warming up - waiting 33 seconds.
> scanimage: sane_start: Error during device I/O
>
> This usually takes more than 9 + 33 seconds to happen
please repeat the test by run
Hi,
> > please repeat the test by running
> > "SANE_DEBUG_SNAPSCAN=255 scanimage >/tmp/junk.bin 2>debug.log"
> > and send me the debug.log file.
>
> I've sent you a copy directly.
The first three lines of the log read
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of snapscan to 255.
[snapscan] sane_snapscan
Hi,
> Using the latest drivers helps and i can now scan, however preview
> doesn't work. At least i can get an image out of it now.
>
> It seems to only preview either the area of the most recent scan or
> nothing, and then stretches that image vertically to fit the A4
> scannable area and shows t
Hi,
> [snapscan] read_calibration_data: snapscan_cmd command failed:
> Error during device I/O [snapscan] calibrate: read_calibration_data
> command failed: Error during device I/O [snapscan]
> sane_snapscan_start: calibration failed.
the error occurs during quality calibration. It's a known issu
Hi,
> Oliver : I've sent you a copy of the log and a screen shot of what
> occurs.
it seems that the scanner somehow doesn't like the set_window command
which is used to set the scanning area for previewing.
Since normal scanning works I suspect that it's either the requested
image size or th
Hi,
> http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/eps2480debug.log
> http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/eps2580debug.log
>[snapscan] sense_handler: Hardware error. (0x00, 0x04)
according to my docs this means "scan module locked". You probably
didn't remove the transportation lock. For Benq scanne
Hi,
> Thanks, on the 2480 this was really the case. On the 2580 it was
> already open.
It seems the 2580 behaves somewhat different, although it uses the
same USB ID. Up to now I have no idea what's going wrong.
The log you sent for the 2580 indicates an error in
snapscani_usb_open() which is
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 02.00, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Oliver Schwartz wrote:
> > The delays are annoying, but it seems that all delays are
> > requested by the scanner. You can try to reduce the number of
> > retries for the test_unit_ready in snapscan-scsi.c, line 100
Hi,
> http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/eps2580debug2.log
>
> Coomand line was:
>
> SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB=255 SANE_DEBUG_SNAPSCAN=255 scanimage > 1.pnm
> 2> eps2580debug2.log
> [snapscan] snapscani_usb_open(libusb:001:037)
> [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_open: trying to open device `libusb:001:037'
>
Hi,
the backtraces are quite obscure. Is there any chance that you have
two versions of SANE installed on your system (e.g. one
in /usr/lib/sane, another one in /usr/local/lib/sane)?
/Oliver
Hi,
> Why does the frontend want to set the gray gamma table to (nil)?
>
> [snapscan] sane_snapscan_control_option (0x823a6b0, 24, 1, (nil),
> 0xbfffdffc)
>
> Maybe I don't understand something here but that looks strange.
This seems to cause the crash (which is not that surprising). For some
re
Hi,
> - There are long delays between starting the scanner software and
> the GUI opening or the scan beginning. Messages like
>
> [snapscan] Scanner warming up - waiting 33 seconds
>
> appear on the console from where the scanning frontend was started.
Did you try reducing the retry counter yet?
Hi,
> I have an Epson Perfection 2580 Photo and when scanning at 50-1200
> dpi I get good scans, but when scanning at 2400 dpi I get a
> vertical comb effect. Every other line is shifted 4 pixels down.
>
> I know support for this scanner is still being worked on, but any
> ideas?
It's a known iss
Hi,
> > - The biggest problem is that the USB device address (like
> > libusb:001:015) changes when the firmware is uploaded, it seems
> > that after the upload the scanner is disconnected and then
> > reconnected and so it gets a new ID.
>
> Doesn't happen here with a 2480.
This may depend on th
Hi,
> I know that I need libusb with linux 2.6 but how do I point to the
> device ?
You don't need to, it'll be found automatically. You only need to
specify vendor and product id in snapscan.conf, e.g.
usb 0x04a5 0x20b0
> sane-find-scanner finds none
>
> sane-find-scanner /proc/bus/usb/001/0
Hi,
> yes, if I were lucky. But I'm not.
> So let's say it "should" be found automatically.
the problem was a duplicate installation of SANE, one of which was
compiled without libusb support.
/Oliver
Hi,
please send me the (compressed) complete debug log from scanimage.
What USB driver (uhci / ohci / ehci) are you using?
It would be helpful if anyone with a 2480 or 2580 could produce an usb
trace in windows. Instructions available on request.
/Oliver
Hi,
> here is the extracts from snapscan.conf that required a twig at
> firmware line:
>
> #-- General
> ---
>
> # Change to the fully qualified filename of your firmware file, if
> # firmware upload is needed by the scanner
> #firmware /
Hi,
> [snapscan] Downloading file:/usr/local/etc/sane.d/Esfw41.bin
> [snapscan] Cannot open firmware file
> file:/usr/local/etc/sane.d/Esfw41.bin. [snapscan] Edit the firmware
> file entry in snapscan.conf.
> [snapscan] sane_snapscan_open: download_firmware command failed:
> Invalid argument
> [sna
Hi,
> after my last message I'm here again with new "cognitions". I
> compiled again with only ./configure and nothing options like as it
> works one time and now what should I say? Situation normal, all
> fucked up!
As you can easily see the firmware file entry still has a "file:"
prefix which
Hi,
> I need the esfw41.bin firmware file for the epson perfection 2480
> scanner.
>
> It does not appear to exist as an independent file on the cdrom.
> I tried installing the software on a windows xp machine, but
> couldnt find it, probably because lacking administrative rights,
> one of the
Hi,
> #firmware /etc/filename.bin
> firmware /etc/u222v067.bin
> # firmware /etc/u126v043.bin
You're using the wrong firmware file. For the Benq 3300 with USB ID
0x04a5/20b0 you need the file u176v???.bin
> # If not automatically found you may manually specify a device
> name.
>
> # For USB sca
Hi,
> I filled a Bug (#301085), but since there was no response, I'll try
> the mailinglist.
It wasn't assigned to me yet, so I didn't notice it. I've assigned it
now.
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of snapscan to 2.
> device `snapscan:libusb:001:007' is a Acer FlatbedScanner40 flatbed
> s
--nextPart1156665.ktTrc2nG56
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
> So I'm rather confused now... Why my scanner did work some months
> ago?
Your scanner is supported by the snapscan backend. To assist you wi
Hi all,
I've received a report from a user who was left with a broken scanner
after using the Epson 2480 in transparency mode in 2400 DPI with
xsane. According to the report the scanner power light went red and
the scanner "smelled hot". After power-cycling the scanner it was not
possible to s
Hi,
> I take it you are positive that this user used the snapscan backend
> when this happened. The epkowa backend also supports this scanner.
actually I'm not. All information that I have is the bug report here:
http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410366&aid=301692&group_id=30186
--nextPart1536942.DB4TraMGXJ
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
please provide the output from=20
SANE_DEBUG_SNAPSCAN=3D255 scanimage -L
Regards,
Oliver
On Thursday 28 April 2005 23:25, MarC wrote:
> My
Hi,
> However, when I attempt to access the scanner in any way, using
> xscan, scanimage -T, etc., it does not work, and the scanner then
> disapears from the
> 'scanimage -L' output, and does not return unless hotplug services
> are restarted & the scanner restarted & reattached.
>
> Based on the
Hi,
> After reading, googling, and more reading, this is what I assume it
> is to be done in order to get the Scan working properly. However, I
> DO NOT get it working, so please let me know what I am doing so
> wrong.
>
> 1) Connect the Scanner
> 2) Get the firmware (a_file.bin)
> 3) Place the fi
Hi,
> By the way:
> Does anybody know why model name autodetection fails
> for the "EPSON PERFECTION 2480 PHOTO"?
> Is the model name stored inside the scanner and this model
> reports only "EPSON Scanner" on the USB bus or has the USB system
> a map "model ID -> model name" where an entry for thi
Hi,
On Friday 15 July 2005 23:55, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > +++ sane/backend/snapscan-mutex.c?Fri Feb ?4 15:42:37 2005
>
> Not applied. I'll leave that for the snapscan maintainer.
I've commited the snapscan specific changes as well. Hope I didn't
miss anything.
/Oliver
-
Hi,
> > umm, so can we get the transparency preview/scan size restored to
> > how it was in the past? i'm not sure of the exact dimensions,
> > but, why not use the entire available area?
>
> I agree, especially as 1.0.16 is soon to be released.
>
> Ideally the backend should set the size dependi
On Monday 01 August 2005 03:36, Ken Ramey wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I have been working all weekend on this problem. At the beginning,
> my new scanner wasn't even recognized by Fedora. Now, it is
> recognized but I am unable to acquire any images. In all cases, the
> scanner seems to perform a full scan
Hi,
> After several days of working on this problem, it seems obvious
> that the sane package will not support the transparency unit on the
> Epson 2480.
well, it does, at least for some versions of the 2480. Some people
have reported problems similar to yours (see, e.g.
http://alioth.debian.
Hi,
> I recently got the Epson Perfection 3490 PHOTO scanner.
> Does anyone else have any experience with this scanner, and/or can
> tell me whether it is (or will be in the near future) supported by
> SANE? Any pointers on how I can make it work with SANE is much
> appreciated.
I got some in
Hi all,
> That not withstanding, the snapscan backend sources show that a
> fair bit of the structure of the INQUIRY command's reply is already
> known. This is the command I would expect to show different replies
> for both models.
They do, but up to now I only have the data of three different
Hi,
the code is in CVS now. Please try it and let me know if it works for
you.
I currently don't have any information on the firmware filename.
Usually there is only one supplied with the windows driver. Look for
any *.bin file in the twain32 directory.
/Oliver
Hi,
> maybe there is something beyond versions to make the transpareny
> unit work (or not work), I have the scanner connected via an USB
> hub, having only two USB-ports (USB 1.1), that might have some
> influence as well?
Well, it shouldn't, but I've seen stranger things happen. If the
scanner
Hi,
> Does all this mean that I need to load some firmware onto the
> scanner before I can use it, or should it work out-of-the-box with
> the snapscan backend?
Yes and no. The backend will download the firmware to the scanner
automatically (as does the windows driver). See
http://snapscan.sour
Hi,
> I found the driver in c:/WINDOWS/system32/esfw52.bin, copied it to
> /etc/sane.d and modified the firmware entry in snapscan.conf, and
> now it works even after rebooting both the scanner and the
> computer.
Very good. Can you do some tests, e.g. do all resolutions work? Does
the transpare
Hi,
> Maybe I'm doing something wrong but after cvs update and trying to
> make sane-backends I get:
>
> In file included from snapscan.c:210:
> snapscan-scsi.c: In function 'inquiry':
> snapscan-scsi.c:483: error: 'PERFECTION3590' undeclared (first use
> in this function) snapscan-scsi.c:483: err
Hi,
> In file included from snapscan.c:213:
> snapscan-options.c: In function 'init_options':
> snapscan-options.c:236: error: syntax error before '/' token
Fixed, thanks for testing.
/Oliver
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 21:03, Reinald Kirchner wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I replaced the firmware 1.14 with the 1.16 I received (thanks Simon
> and Ken), but I have no change in the behaviour of my scanner. When
> I address the transparency unit, it runs into a loop. The debug
> ends repeating the
Hi,
> It says that that scanner is supported with support level "basic"
> by the snapscan backend.
>
> > sane-find-scanner gets vendor and product code but scanimage -L
> > finds nothing.
>
> Maybe your sane-backends package is just too old? As far as I know,
> you need version 1.0.16 for that sca
Hi,
> That made scanimage recognize and use the scanner, but it is unable
> to scan the full page. It only scans 75-80% of the width and
> height. Subsequent questions have gone unanswered and I've had
> limited time to look into the backend code myself so I think my
> solution is to return the s
Hi,
> I don't have access to that information right now, so I'll check
> that tonight also. It is whatever firmware came with the scanner -
> esfw52.bin.
yes, but at least for other epson scanners these firmware files are
available in different versions. The filename is always the same.
Anothe
Hi,
> > If it is always the same ratio of real distance to scanned
> > distance (also for -l and -t) it is most likely that the
> > calculation of the scan area is not handled correctly. That could
> > be corrected by changing the value of pos_factor in function
> > set_window() in snapscan-scsi.c
Hi,
> The CVS snapshot I downloaded for 20050815 didn't contain that
> patch. And the CVS version doesn't work for me now (whether I make
> that modification or not), I alternately get messages like
>
> scanimage: open of device snapscan:libusb:001:003 failed: Error
> during device I/O
>
> and
>
>
Hi,
> I am using xsane v0.97 together with the snapscan backend (from
> sane-backends v1.0.15) to drive an Epson 2580 Photo scanner. I'm
> scanning old black and white photographs. Scanning works fine, but the
> preview does not.
There seems to be a problem with previews on the 2580 in the
Hi,
> I have an Epson 2580 scanner, which is capable of 16-bit output for each
> channel, including what it calls monochrome. I'd like to use xsane to
> preview the old black-and-white photographs that I have, and to set the
> tone levels appropriately for each photograph, and then acquire the
Hi,
> scanner Epson Perfection 3590 Photo Firmware esfw52.bin
>
> The scanner did not work.
> sane-findscanner finds the scanner:
>
> ...
> found usb scanner vendor 0x04b8 epson scanner productid 0x0122
The 3590 is not tested yet but should work with the snapscan backend.
The latest version from
Hi,
> I installed the latest SANE backend version, applied Jan Bouke's
> correction, and got the scanner working (after some confusion
> about the firmware file) - at least for paper scanning.
>
> The only problem I have is with the preview mode:
> "scanimage --preview=yes" uses a too high y rsolu
Hi,
> The scanner is slow in preview mode and makes a different noise
> (probably because it is doing very small y steps). Right now
> the preview mode is not the same as the normal 200 dpi mode.
> But this is not surprising: Somewhere around line 870 in
> snapscan-scsi.c you inform the scanner th
Hi,
the behaviour you describe is perfectly normal, as far as the ID of
the scanner is concerned. Initially the scanner identifies itself as
FlatbedScanner_13. After downloading the firmware (which seems to
work only in windows in your case) the scanner identifies itself as
FlatbedScanner_21.
Hi,
On Monday 03 October 2005 18:43, Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:15:41AM +0200, Ulrich Deiters wrote:
> > I set the no-preview bit (source |= 0x40;) in snapscan-scsi.c
> > after line 922, and the problem vanished, i.e., the scanner
> > does a quick, undistorted scan of the
Hi,
> i use a epson perfection 3590 photo with sane-cvs 2005-10-09
> version.if i use the options
>
> -x auto and -y auto
>
> scanimage gives back a error. Can i not use the options -x auto and
> -y auto to detect the scanmaterial automaticaly?
"auto" in this case just means that you do not have
Hi,
> I tried more resolutions. The results are funny:
> - 200 dpi is OK
> - 150 dpi works, too
> - 100 dpi works, but the scanned area was displaced in y direction
> - 75 dpi works, but scans a larger y distance than expected
> - 50 dpi is OK,
> - values under 50 are rounded to 50
I've added 1
Hi,
> I just downloaded the CVS-version of the snapscan backend and
> tested it. It works (for the flatbed part of the scanner)!
>
> The only thing that needs correction is the list of resolutions,
> which at present is
>
> Options specific to device `snapscan:libusb:004:002':
> Scan Mode:
>
Hi,
> I have an Epson 2480 and I'm quite satisfied with it. I haven't
> used it for negatives, only slides; for many purposes the results
> are quite good. Some random thoughts:
>
> * Sane support is very good, but native support (in windows) is
> still better. In particular:
> The windows dri
Hi,
In the last weeks there have been some improvements to the SnapScan
backend for 2480/2580. Most of them were contributed by Simon Munton,
who deserves all the credit :-) In particular there is now support
for 16 bit/color scans for the 2480/2580.
The backend also distinguishes now between
Hi,
> Argh, my 2480 is changing to 5.5cm by 7.5cm (judging from the
> preview window). Debug log attached.
That's very strange. It can either be 5.5 cm x 8 cm or 5.5 cm x 12.0
cm. Everything else is, well, extremely unlikely.
Please send me the file scanimage.txt, resulting from executing
scani
Hi,
>> > Argh, my 2480 is changing to 5.5cm by 7.5cm (judging from the
>> > preview window). Debug log attached.
Your boundaries are fine. From the output of your scanimage command:
> ? Geometry:
> ? ? -l auto|0..55mm [0]
> ? ? ? ? Top-left x position of scan area.
> ? ? -t auto|0..125mm [0]
> ?
Hi,
> When you scan a DIN-A4 page with 200x200 dpi and save it e.g. as a
> tiff file then you get an image with about 1700 x 2200 pixels. At
> this point there is no relation to a size in millimeter,
> centimeter, inch or DIN-A3 or something like that.
I don't think this is completely true. Tiff
Hi,
> I have a chance to pick up a used AGFA Snapscan 1212U from a friend
> (he moved to XP and it's not supported, and gives dire warnings
> against trying).
>
> I see that the support on both the current stable version and the
> dev version is marked as "good". Is there any important features
>
Hi,
> I own an Epson Perfection 3490 and I am beginning to use it with
> the CVS version of SANE (snapscan backend). While it seems to work
> well at resolutions up to 1200 dpi (but I did not yet perform
> really thorough testing), I noticed a kind of interlacing behaviour
> when scanning negative
Hi,
> I've just bought an epson 3490, and download the
> sane-backends-2005-11-10.tar.gz and
> sane-frontends-2005-11-10.tar.gz.
>
> While the flatbed seems to work as expected, the transparency unit
> doesn't.
>
> I want to scan a negative film, but the resulting file is crossed
> by a thick gree
Hi,
> I'm using the tpu on the 3490 with backend-11-10. It works ok
> though the scans seem quite dark compared to the original slide.
> However adjusting the gamma settings on the scanned file gives a
> nice 1024x768 display size. I'm very much a newbie at this so sorry
> I can't give more detail
Hi,
> I don't think the sensors is defective, because it works very well
> on Windows2000 with the Epson software. And I have try the quality
> calibration with no result.
Hm - I don't think so. Quality calibration (i.e. the option named
"Quality calibration", not "Quality scan") was disabled fo
Hi,
> - at 2400 dpi :
> I have done several try, at least a dozen.
> Sometimes it's all dark, sometimes all white, sometimes a
> succession of colored bands, and sometimes I have a good scanning,
> but at least it doesn't scale the entire selection I have made on
> the preview screen. And I have a
Hi,
> I confirm the 3200 dpi works well for me, and there isn't any
> interlacing problems. I apologise for my previous message which was
> not enough clear.
>
> In fact, it seem's that if I do a 2400 dpi scan which does not
> work, then the following 3200 dpi scan are bad. But it works again
> if
Hi,
> Can i hope, that the auto film feeder of the epson 3590 will work?
At the moment the film feed for the 3590 is not supported. I'll need
to get USB traces from a windows scan with film feeder before there's
any chance of supporting it. Anybody who'd like to provide a trace is
welcome to c
Hi,
> > Lineart and grayscale should be fixable.
I've commited a fix to CVS, please test.
> What does the snapscan backend for halftoning? Are there halftoning
> algorithms implemented in software or does it only pass a flag to
> the scanner? I'm asking this because there is a kind of halftonin
Hi,
> When I power up the scanner, I get pretty much the same behavior I
> was getting before, although maybe slightly improved. The scanner
> seems to be resetting every second or so... in dmesg I get a series
> of messages like this:
>
> [4352427.799000] usb 5-7: new high speed USB device using
Hi,
> The new CVS code did not completely solve the remaining interlacing
> problems at 3200 dpi. While now grayscale work well at both 8bit
> and 16bit, lineart is still combing, but rather differently than
> before. Now interlacing is periodically present or absent by blocks
> of 8 vertical scan
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 21:12, St?phane VOLTZ wrote:
> since Pierre has added lineart emulation.
I'll need to add something similar to the snapscan backend in the long
run, since some new scanners don't support lineart mode. It still
would be nice to have lineart for OCR etc. on th
Hi,
> > Same applies to interpoliation. I have a huge patch in my inbox
> > that adds scaling to my avision backend just because some
> > el-cheapo OEM scanners do not appear to deliver any resolution -
> > and for the highest resolution of 2400 dpi have a memory shortage
> > and thus the author i
Hi,
> A little googling turned up this thread from last December:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2004-December/0
>12758.html
> ...
> The image is recognisable, but has vertical colour bars all the way
> across it. (*For reference, a test scan is attached, so you can see
> wh
Hi,
> Is there anything I can do to help get the Transparency unit to
> work?
As far as I know the transparency unit of the 3490 works ok. The only
thing not supported is the automatic film feeder of the 3590. Please
make sure you use the latest version of the snapscan backend from
CVS.
If y
Hi,
> I've 5250C benq scanner that I would like to get working under
> linux. I've tried the sane CVS snapshot from December 4th 2005
> without any luck. After some time spent by googling I've found
> following information:
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2004-December/0
>1
Hi,
On Monday 12 December 2005 13:22, dmeret...@repsolypf.com wrote:
> Sorry for disturbing, but I would like to know if there are someone
> with experience in Agfa SnapScan 1212p (parallel). Or some place to
> go.
The parallel protocol for Agfa scanners is unknown. It's probably some
sort of SC
Hi,
> 1. Someone should change the sane compatibility list to show that
> it does NOT work as of sane-backends-1.0.16. It should be noted
> you need CVS or .17 once it's released.
Where did you get the information that it does work with
sane-backends-1.0.16? The device list for 1.0.16 doesn't l
Hi,
> I'm writting this to know if anyone are/have
> write/written a backend for this scanner. (Guttenprint
> have support for printing).
>
> If not, i have one of these i "will ***TRY***" (I'm no
> a programmer any longer since some years ago, but i
> can remember C more or less clearly) to write
Hi,
> Repeat: Please reply to the list unless the message is really
> private.
Why don't we set the Reply-to field so that replies are usually sent=20
to the mailing list? Just in the exceptional case where the answer is=20
really private the mailer has to change the To: field to the original=20
Hi,
> I forgot to say that firmware (u222v067.bin) path is pointed in
> snapscan.conf.
You're using the wrong firmware file. For your model (0x04a5, 0x20b0) you
should use u176v042.bin (the last three digits may differ depending on the
version of your driver CD).
-Oliver
--
+++ GMX - Mail, M
the snapscan backend has heard baout that scanner:
> > Oliver Schwartz
>
> I've checked around a little bit and found some tidbits of
> information that seems to indicate that the GT-7400U is the little
> sister of the GT-8400U. There is a reasonable chance that this
>
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Friday 03 October 2003 15:50, Yan Seiner wrote:
> Does anyone know if the original Agfa SnapScan (without a trailing
> designation) is supported? I see good support for SnapScan xxx,
> but the plain SnapScan is not mentioned as either suppor
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> Problem is that my acer 3300u scanner, is not working in lineart
> mode. Images are good for grayscale and color.=20
It's working fine here on my Acer Prisa 620. Since lineart is not very=20
thoroughly tested (few people seem to use it) it's
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> It turns out that the 1670 is actually made by Acer/BenQ,
> just like the Perfection 660, and uses Acer commands.
I'll see if I can add support for it in the snapscan backend - Henning=20
already filed me a feature request, so I won't forget
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> There has been some discusiion about that topic and the ChangeLog
> of our development version reads:
> [...]
The changes I made so far enable the SnapScan backend to detect the=20
scanner and download the firmware file.=20
> Oliver: Does th
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 22:13, Dwight Stone wrote:
> unsubscribe
Every (every!!!) mail from this list has a footer with a link to the=20
web interface of the mailing list server. Use the link to cancel your=20
subscription.=20
> > ___
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
With a lot of test effort from J=F6rg Skottke I've finally managed to=20
add support for the Epson 1670 in the SnapScan backend. You need the=20
latest SANE sources from CVS to try it ( see=20
http://www.sane-project.org/snapshots/ ).
After
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> 1. all b/w pictures are too dark
This should be adjustable via brightness / contrast sliders in xsane.=20
=46or best results you should use the sliders in the "standard option"=20
window, the ones in the main window will only modify the image
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> Personally I don't like using macros as they are not type safe, and
> can cause problems when porting to other languages.
> If you want to save memory (4 bytes :) ) then use
> typedef SANE_Status
> {
> short code;
> short backend-code;
> }
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> sane-find-scanner says:
> found USB scanner (vendor=3D0x06bd [AGFA], product=3D0x208d [ SNAPSCAN
> e40 ]) at libusb:008:008
>
> but :
> lundi:~/Documents/Projets/sane/sane-backends/include/sane rzara$
> scanimage -L
> [sanei_debug] Setting deb
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> It's a Acer / Benq 620P parallel port scanner, and in the Sane
> compatibility list the status for a driver for this model is marked
> as "unknown". Can you tell me if someone is working on a Sane
> driver for this model? Or can I use another
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
