=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
On Friday 03 October 2003 15:50, Yan Seiner wrote: > Does anyone know if the original Agfa SnapScan (without a trailing > designation) is supported? I see good support for SnapScan xxx, > but the plain SnapScan is not mentioned as either supported or > unsupported. Yes, it's supported. I wasn't aware that this model really existed, I=20 always assumed that it's just another ID of a SnapScan 300. I haven't=20 received any reports of working / nonworkin plain SnapScans, so I'd=20 be happy about a feedback once you try it. =2D -Oliver =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/fbAi/V6sbrmfIuMRAsViAKCDRraVIsWrhly4n7S6f7/zStTHFACfacpU 7vKnFAAGZH1fSsKQnP3qaF0=3D =3Dj16o =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
