On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 1:31:32 PM UTC-4, ahaus...@umassd.edu
wrote:
>
>
>
> The server of Sage 7.3 for Mac OS 10.11.6 (the app version) will not
> start!
> Here is the error report from the Terminal:
>
>
>
> > Thanks everyone for the replies. I'd have to do this on a local server.
> > Ironically, there is a somewhat draconian Australian law that is a
> > consequence of the Australian-US trade agreements that probably make it
> > illegal for me to keep data on foreign servers, but no doubt my
>
Luis Finotti wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 5:41:37 PM UTC-4, leif wrote:
>
> Luis Finotti wrote:
> > I can't compile 7.3 using Debian Unstable.
>
> Do you intentionally (try to) build Sage's GCC? (I have to admit I
> haven't tried to build 4.9.3 with 6.x, but building
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 5:41:37 PM UTC-4, leif wrote:
>
> Luis Finotti wrote:
> > I can't compile 7.3 using Debian Unstable.
>
> Do you intentionally (try to) build Sage's GCC? (I have to admit I
> haven't tried to build 4.9.3 with 6.x, but building older GCCs with
> newer versions
Pressing TAB after a dot on some object gives (in the recent 7.4.beta1)
this:
sage: M = Matrix([1])
sage: M.
M.act_on_polynomial M.anticommutator
M.add_multiple_of_column M.antitranspose
M.add_multiple_of_row M.apply_map >
M.additive_ord
Just in case some other new person sees this there is one point I should
correct/clarify from the original post.
In fact a1r1, a1r2, and a1r3 are *not *three distinct representations of
the same mathematical object. The
representation of the first simple root as an element of the ambient space
Andrew wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the replies. I'd have to do this on a local server.
> Ironically, there is a somewhat draconian Australian law that is a
> consequence of the Australian-US trade agreements that probably make it
> illegal for me to keep data on foreign servers, but no doubt my
>
Thanks everyone for the replies. I'd have to do this on a local server.
Ironically, there is a somewhat draconian Australian law that is a
consequence of the Australian-US trade agreements that probably make it
illegal for me to keep data on foreign servers, but no doubt my university
would not
C'est clair. Je ne vois pas où est le problème car le projet reste open
source avec en 0lus une volonté de proposer une utilisation sur un serveur
local.
Le 25 août 2016 10:29, "Henri Girard" a écrit :
> Certains on la dent longue ! lol
>
>
> Le 25/08/2016 à 10:14, Justin C. Walker a écrit :
>
>
Certains on la dent longue ! lol
Le 25/08/2016 à 10:14, Justin C. Walker a écrit :
Why is this still being discussed? It belongs on the flame list.
On Aug 24, 2016, at 13:12 , Nathann Cohen wrote:
Quote from William Stein, CEO of SageMath Inc (private for-profit
Delaware company) [1]
S
Why is this still being discussed? It belongs on the flame list.
On Aug 24, 2016, at 13:12 , Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Quote from William Stein, CEO of SageMath Inc (private for-profit
> Delaware company) [1]
>
>So there is no confusion, my top priority right now is to **make a lot
>of mon
That is not a problem. You can still use your own server to use SMC . That
will be my choice because in France we cannot pay a lot for tools in
HighSchool.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French teacher of **math** in a high school **
leif wrote:
> Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> Do we support gcc 6.1.1 now?
>
> Sure. (Modulo building Sage's GCC 4.9.3 with it... ;-) )
The only thing we missed in Sage 7.3 is Givaro's testsuite, which
currently only builds when manually passing '-std=c++98' in CXXFLAGS.
-leif
--
You received this
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Do we support gcc 6.1.1 now?
Sure. (Modulo building Sage's GCC 4.9.3 with it... ;-) )
(6.2 has just been released, but that's a bugfix release in the 6.x series.)
-leif
> This is what is used during the build.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
14 matches
Mail list logo
