Hello all, do you consider to allow to download and upload multiple
files in Sage? Perhaps in zip file? It would be really usefull for
people working on more servers (on laptop at home, on sagenb.org at
wife's computer, behind firewall on university, .) and also for
teachers (all worksheets i
On 18 zář, 08:33, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> > Ok, but it should be possible to share the "worksheet" directory ?
> > I *need* to share it (we have 3 machines, on which the users -some
> >hundredsof students- will be connected at random).
>
> I don't think that would be possible. What you could
Dear developers of Sage
desolve seems to be broken for second order IVP. Some discussion is on
http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/b6f6b6f056e80149
I hope, I described the solution for the problem, byt I have not
enough skills (yes) to write the patch. Is anybody inte
Hello all,
studying the problem related to desolve and discussed in sage-suppport
(
http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/b6f6b6f056e80149
), I have one more question:
The function desolve ends with this:
if soln.lhs() == dvar:
soln = soln.rhs()
So sometim
ny with customs used in Sage? And
how can send this message to the user, without producing error like
raise NotImplementedError, "Maxima was unable to solve this system."
Thank you
Robert Marik
On 4 říj, 00:22, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> studying the pr
On 7 říj, 10:53, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:40 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> By insecure, I assume you mean it returns bogus answers?
Yes, if we substitute initial conditions and solve for constants %k1,
%k2, then
%k1, %k2 may depend on x and y and thus substitu
Hello all
Trying to fix http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2617
My idea is to write wrapped for maxima solve command which
* passes equations to maxima within errcatch environment (to prevent
errors from solve(acot(x)==0,x) )
* optionally does either nothing more,
or (default) plugs the
On 9 říj, 03:48, kcrisman wrote:
> On Oct 8, 8:35 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>
Thank to both for your posts.
Among others, I now understand that
m=maxima(something)
m.solve(something)
calls solve(m,something) in Maxima and I can also pass other commands
to the *same* Maxima session by using s
Hello,
trying to fix desolve_laplace as described at
http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/b6f6b6f056e80149/e2c0cf18cce9926c
It is continuation of ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6479
which has been (hope) solved.
The temporary code is http://user.mend
Thanks, thats incredibly fast. I have now error when trying to
download the patch. I'll try it as soon as possible.
The last version od desolvers.py is
http://user.mendelu.cz/marik/temp/desolvers.py
Robert M.
On 9 říj, 18:25, kcrisman wrote:
> See patch at #385. Can you test it with your new
, he can add the support for
inverse laplace transformation into Sage. Opensource is great :)
Thanks
Robert Marik
On 9 říj, 23:20, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Thanks, thats incredibly fast. I have now error when trying to
> download the patch. I'll try it as soon as possible.
Hello all, is there in Sage a function which tests, if expression1
depends on expression2 ?
Something like Maxima's command freeof?
I searched Sage sources against 'freeof 'and found nothing relevant.
If not, I think that it will be usefull to add the following function
into Sage, but I have no
On 11 říj, 15:50, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> Does this work for you?
Yes, thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Burcin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr..
Hi than you for info.
I just work on improving desolve and realted things (bug
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6479 ) . As I understand the
previous code, your syntax for desolve is old and preferred one is
des = desolve(de,y,ivar=t,ics=[0,1])
Robert Marik
btw: the last version of my
Hello all, I observed the following behavior of Sage 4.1.1 and 4.1.2
rc0
* Sign as robert.marik
* Create worksheet
* Save & quit
* Log on
* Log in - the worksheet has been deleted
* Log on and Log in as admin --- the worksheet is stil there
Can you reproduce this behavior at your installations o
Oops, sorry for typo and missing step.
* Log in as user (not admin)
* Create worksheet and enter something (x^2 + shift enter)
* Save & quit
* Go to the worksheet again and delete
* Log OFF
* Log in ad user - the worksheet has been deleted
* Log OFF
* Log in as admin --- the worksheet is stil the
> I rewrote this functionality in the new notebook. Could you please
> try your test at
>
> http://standalone.sagenb.org/
>
> and see whether you have the same problem. And, what browser, OS, etc.?
Linux Debian, Firefox (not exactly, debian has its own clone of
firefox - IceWeasel)
I cannot t
Oooops, I did it on sagenb.org.
Now going to standalone.sagenb.org and try the same again
R.M.
On 12 říj, 19:54, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> I just created on sagenb.org worksheet named robert.marik with one
> line: x^2 saved, returned and deleted.
>
> It is deleted fo
Hello all
This is for developers interested in Calculus.
Since the patch for #385 is available and seems to work for me, I
finished my work on #6479
You have to use 2 patches from #6479 and one patch from #385
After this we have the following enhancements in Sage:
* Fixed #6479 (bad solution
On 13 říj, 16:08, rjf wrote:
> Is x^2+3 free of x^6?
> Ordinarily I would think that if E is free of v, then one could vary v
> in any way, and not affect the value of E.
> If one varies x^6, it is kind of difficult to keep x^2+3 constant.
>
> I suppose you could specify a program to search i
Do not know if this is relevant, but I get the message
It looks like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I
will try to keep going, but it could get ugly.
when looking at published worksheets, like http://uw.sagenb.org/home/pub/4/
I do not have this problem with Sage 4.1.1
Firefox
Hello, I still have problem with jsmath mentioned at thread "notebook
help needed". See the copy below and Jason's reply. I have the error
message on sagenb.org and I can see Latex code instead of the formula.
No problem of this type with Version 4.1.1.
It would be nice if jsmath on sagenb.org wo
On 15 říj, 16:38, Jason Grout wrote:
> Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> > * Install *all* jsMath image fonts on sagenb.org
> > * Silently fall back to using image fonts if TeX fonts are not available
>
> This is what was done in the sage notebook a few days ago. William had
> installed the optional jsm
On 15 říj, 17:55, Jason Grout wrote:
> ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> Thanks. This issue is now tracked
> athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7229
>
>From the manual I have an impression that it is sufficient to download
the spkg file, unpack, fix (perhaps only one li
On 15 říj, 18:57, William Stein wrote:
> Yes. And ping me as soon as you do it, since I can review it.
>
> William
The fixed spkg file is at
http://user.mendelu.cz/marik/temp/jsmath-image-fonts-1.4.spkg
(cannot upload to trac server due to the filesize limit)
Robert
--~--~-~--~~
On 16 říj, 06:18, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For a grant proposal, I would like to assemble a list of people
> running Sage notebook servers either publicly or privately (but more
> than just for their own person use, of course, e.g. for their group),
> with maybe some statement about how t
Hello all, trying to export worksheet in a form of html page which is
accesible even if the sage server is down or behind a firewall and
even if the user has no jsmath fonts.
My attempts include
* Print into PDF - poor quality of math and each math output is shown
two times in resulting file
*
On 16 říj, 14:50, kcrisman wrote:
> On Oct 16, 7:41 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>
> > Hello all, trying to export worksheet in a form of html page which is
> > accesible even if the sage server is down or behind a firewall and
> > even if the user has
On 16 říj, 15:38, William Stein wrote:
>
> > btw: I also think on the possibility to produce LaTeX code from Sage
> > worksheet.
>
> That would be nice. I've never seen an HTML -> Latex converter before
> (though there are many Latex-->HTML converters).
>
In fact, I had in mind something very p
To have more fun, I have this:
ma...@asus-eee:/opt/sage$ ./sage
--
| Sage Version 4.1.2, Release Date: 2009-10-14 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
I am. I will write there.
Robert
On 16 říj, 22:23, Jason Grout wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
> > This was the Maxima upgrade, for sure. It is not in 4.1.1 (just
> > checked) and is in the latest CVS of Maxima (just checked that, too).
> > I can't submit a bug report to them right now - can you emai
On 16 říj, 22:44, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> I am. I will write there.
>
it is http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.maxima.general/28550
R.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
n't think it is a good
> idea to have a release with such a serious bug, out for too long...
> the problem is that I wouldn't like to switch back to an old maxima,
> so we should at least wait for them fixing it... maybe we can help on
> that
>
> regards
>
> Mauri
On 17 říj, 00:40, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2:23 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> > I'm not on their list. I hope Robert Dodier or someone else sees this.
>
> Probably it's best to submit Maxima bugs to the bug
> tracker.http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=4933&atid=104933
>
> This is also present in the Maxima current CVS version. Someone may
> want to report this to the Maxima bug tracker - I cannot right now.
>
Old Maxima 5.18 has the same problem.
I reported this as ID 2880886, since the problem seems to be different
one than
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/
On 17 říj, 12:42, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Oct 17, 8:18 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>
> > I reported this as ID 2880886, ...
>
> Thanks. Out of curiosity, i tried this integral with sympy. This ends
> up to take minutes or longer. Should we report this as
Hello all,
does Sage solve inequlitites? According to Maxima mail list (
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.maxima.general/28497/focus=28530
) Maxima can do at elast someting in this area. I was not able to find
out, wheather Sage can somehow solve ineqaulities - via maxima or via
ano
btw: I was able to find only this:
http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c5990ef9e797109e/e7bf439813a6489c?lnk=gst&q=inequality#e7bf439813a6489c
On 17 říj, 19:21, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> does Sage solve inequlitites? Accord
You have to use finer mesh / more points in such cases
u = var('u')
parametric_plot3d( (u*sin(u), u*cos(u), u), (u, 0,
100),plot_points=500,viewer='tachyon')
(I tested it with viewer tachyon since I do not have java on current
machine)
Hope this helps
Robert
On 17 říj, 20:00, QuantumDream wro
--
| Sage Version 4.1.2, Release Date: 2009-10-13 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
--
sage: a= x^2+
On 17 říj, 23:27, Robert Dodier wrote:
> ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> > does Sage solve inequlitites? According to Maxima mail list (
> >http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.maxima.general/28497/f...
> > ) Maxima can do at elast someting in this area. I was not
On 17 říj, 21:17, William Stein wrote:
> > Hm, probably this is the only available way how to solve inequalities
> > and at least the wrapper should be written.
> > I can try it, but not within these 14 days.
>
> Wow, that's awesome. You should definitely try two weeks from now!!
Despite my p
>
> This is already fixed on Trac # 1163, waiting for review - I hope this
> does what you need. In fact, if you could review that, # 385, and #
> 3914, I think they are all related to things you are working on, so
> that would be very helpful.
>
Thanks for your answer
The patches are nice and
Hello all, I looked at trac 7084 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7084
* If I enter the commands from test section in
sage: var('m')
m
sage: assume(n, 'integer'); assume(m, 'integer')
into Sage session (4.2), then Sage hangs. I have to enter also var
('n') to co
> > > > Hm, probably this is the only available way how to solveinequalities
> > > > and at least the wrapper should be written.
> > > > I can try it, but not within these 14 days.
The patch is here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7325
Robert
--~--~-~--~~~-
Hello all
The latex representation of numbers in scientific notation works as
excepted, unless we have these numbers as results from numerical
integral. Compare the last two outputs i nthe session below. Why is
sage: latex(A[1])
1.66533453694e-14
and not
sage: latex(A[1])
1.66533453694 \times
On 30 říj, 08:32, William Stein wrote:
>
> Obviously, it would be nice if the latex command were improved so it
> is aware of Python floats. That would be a nice enhancement you
> can contribute to sage.
Thank you for quick answer. Can you give me few pointers where to fix
it?
Robert
>
> -
On 30 říj, 08:49, William Stein wrote:
>
> There is a table in there called latex_table. You have to
> add an entry of the form
>
>float:float_function
>
> where you might first try something like this just to get it to work:
>
> def float_function(x):
> from sage.rings.all import RR
>
Hello all,
I wondered for longer time, why I got error which nobody reported (see
the bottom of this message).
Now I found the explanation: I have ~/.maxima/maxima-init.lisp file
with the following line:
:lisp(setf (get '%sin 'tex) nil)
The reason for this file is to get "sin(x)" instead of "s
perhaps a vocabulary (simple html page or whatever else) which
translates old names into new names would be also useful.
On 1 lis, 16:37, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> What about deprecation warning and moving the deprecated functionality
> to an optional package in the next version of Sage with a clea
> We might also have an option for "fixed in our version", as many times
> we will patch an spkg and simultaneously report it upstream. When we
> eventually get the upstream fix in an update, we delete our patch.
>
In other words, is this preferred way to fix broken Maxima commands?
1. Fix in m
Dear developers, I looked into sage/symbolics/expressions.pyx and the
definition of simplify_trig().
This funciton applies trigsimp and trigexpand from Maxima and as a
result,
sage: (tan(3*x)).simplify_full()
gives terrible result
(4*cos(x)^2 - 1)*sin(x)/(4*cos(x)^3 - 3*cos(x))
Despite the fact
> > * the maxima expression x#0 (x is not equal 0) has no meaning in
> > Sage. If the answer from Maxima contains x#0 and this answer is in
> > variable sol, then
> > sage: sol.sage()
> > fails. I have no idea how and where could fix it. Can somebody add
> > this feature to Sage? Thanks.
>
> Thi
On 11 lis, 12:45, Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is weird:
>
> sage: p = var('p')
> sage: q = var('q')
> sage: assume(p >= 0)
> sage: assume(q >= 0)
> sage: assume(p <= 1)
> sage: assume(q <= 1)
> sage: bool(p**2 <= 1)
> True
> sage: bool(q**2 <= 1)
> True
> sage: bool(p**2 + q**2 <= 2)
>
Dear readers of sage-devel
This is related to Ticket #7334 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7334
which introduces new function for contracting logarithms, expanding
logarithms, reducing powers of trigonometric functions and simplifying
rational expressions.
---
On 12 lis, 15:17, Francois Maltey wrote:
> So imagine a Sage 4.xyz with
>
> y = log(2)+log(3)+exp(2)*exp(3)
> contract (y) # log(6)+exp(5)
> contract(y, target=log) # log(6)+exp(2)*exp(3)
> contract(y, target=exp)
On 12 lis, 16:38, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Care to help?
Many thanks but I do not know anything about programming. I can
write simple artless scripts and thats all. I also do not know enough
from complex analysis, know nothing about computer algorithms and so
on. I think that nobody would be
On 13 lis, 14:30, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:30:01 -0800 (PST)
>
> "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> > Could the conclusion be the following?
> > "If you want (and if the realease manager includes corresponding
> > patches), add suppor
On 14 lis, 18:30, Francois Maltey wrote:
> a'-Extract and test sin in sin(x) is easy, but recognize the + in x+y is
> heavy.
>
And perhaps even worse for x+z+z+z_1
The paper of RJF can be perhaps useful (examples written in Maxima,
but general ideas) to deal with addition and multiplication:
On 17 lis, 13:00, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Nathann Cohen
> wrote:
> > I am using Emacs ( and I am interested in knowing which softwares you
> > are using ), but so far I mainly failed to convince people this was
> > also the best option for them.
>
> I
On 18 lis, 21:49, Harald Schilly wrote:
> I got this from the "report a problem" form, confirmed in 4.2.1
>
> sage: solve([x==x],x)
> gives an exception.
>
> Maxima says this:
> $ maxima -q
> (%i1) solve([x=x],x);
> (%o1) all
> (%i2)
Similar problem is
solve(SR(0),
On 18 lis, 23:54, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 18 lis, 21:49, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> > I got this from the "report a problem" form, confirmed in 4.2.1
>
> > sage: solve([x==x],x)
> > gives an exception.
>
> > Maxima says
> [x==r1] would be consistent with the multivariable case; I like that
> better than True or [x==x], for example.
>
Does this mean [x==r1] when called for the first time, [x==r2] when
for the secod time and so on?
Look at the example below.
Robert
---
On 19 lis, 04:47, kcrisman wrote:
> > [x==r1] would be consistent with the multivariable case; I like that
> > better than True or [x==x], for example.
>
> I think that makes sense, especially with the to_poly_solve update
> recently merged, which uses that syntax. Robert, perhaps the
> inequal
On 19 lis, 07:35, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> > [x==r1] would be consistent with the multivariable case; I like that
> > better than True or [x==x], for example.
>
> Does this mean [x==r1] when called for the first time, [x==r2] when
> for the secod time and so o
Dear developers
The following LaTeX exporession is not nice
sage: latex(x*(1/(x^2)+sqrt(x^7)))
{(\sqrt{x^{7}} + \frac{1}{x^{2}})} x
far better would be
sage: latex(x*(1/(x^2)+sqrt(x^7)))
{\left(\sqrt{x^{7}} + \frac{1}{x^{2}}\right)} x
Is the following code from pynac from file mul.cpp respo
Thanks Mike
I wonder how tickets with positive review are merged into Sage. The
following two have positive review and were not included. Is something
wrong with the patches? Or should the tickets simply wait for
inclusion?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7325
http://trac.sagemath.org/sa
On 22 lis, 18:05, John Cremona wrote:
> I built 4.3.alpha0 fine on two linux machines (32 and 64 bit) but on
> both I get one failure:
>
> The following tests failed:
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py"
>
> Details below.
>
This has been explained in the first message whic
On 22 lis, 22:38, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Upgrading from 4.2.1 on Fedora 11, 32 bit I had the known issue with
> interfaces/maxima.py
This was my patch. I am very sorry for this and do not understand, why
all tests passed on my computer when I tested this patch. Now I have
the same issue.
Robert
-
On 24 lis, 07:25, Martin Rubey
wrote:
> "Dr. David Kirkby" writes:
>
> > I find it hard to believe Sage will not have a negative impact on the
> > sales of Mathematica, but I certainly hope Sage does not put Wolfram
> > Research out of business. I very much doubt it will either.
>
> I am with you
sage: a=(sqrt(6)-sqrt(5))^-1
sage: maxima(a).trigrat()
sqrt(6)+sqrt(5)
Now the question is, how to include trigrat function into Sage. I
attempted to do something similar for logarithms and logcontract,
logexpand in http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7334 - see the
related dicussion on sag
Seems that this comes from Maxima. Look at this
sage: fu=maxima(k6).fullratsimp().sage();fu
-12*(3*(28960879780288*sqrt(2) + 49414857768735)*sqrt(3) -
150485145634059*sqrt(2) - 256767132912716)/(3*(40774373203317*sqrt(2)
- 90564557902141)*sqrt(3) - 211869858104760*sqrt(2) + 470587246954565)
sage:
O.K. so the magic is Maxima flag algebraic=true, as explained in
http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-devel/t/4928c36765ff6972
On 10 pro, 07:38, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Seems that this comes from Maxima. Look at this
>
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@goo
Dear sage-devel
I tried to use plot_region as follows
plot_region(-1http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Dear sage-devel
this is doctested in relation.py
sage: f = x + 3 < y - 2
sage: f*(-1)
-x - 3 < -y + 2
Is this really intended behavior? Shouldnt the answer be the
following?
sage: f*(-1)
-x - 3 > -y + 2
But what about f*(a) or f*(x-2)? Should Sage return this?
(-x-3)*(x-2)<(2-y)*(x-2)
Or rai
On 10 pro, 11:02, Harald Schilly wrote:
> > (%i3) ratsimp(a), algebraic=true;
>
> Ok, is it wise to do this by default if called from sage?
Not sure (could it break something in integration for example?) but
without this we have bug described at
http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-devel/browse_t
Great, thanks for explanation. Robert
On 10 pro, 13:30, andrejv wrote:
>
> I don't think there is a bug there. It's just that one form is harder
> to compute numerically because of rounding errors.
>
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On 15 pro, 08:47, Jason Grout wrote:
> If you want to see a preview of the MathJax, next version of jsmath,
> which Davide has been working on for a while, go to:
>
> http://www.mathjax.com/?page_id=13
>
I have scattered tee in Firefox (2.0) and very bad rendering in Opera
(9.63)
Do you have in M
On 21 pro, 09:21, cch wrote:
> Maxima-5.20.1 with clisp version works on my linux-32 Sage-4.2.
Isn't clisp the slowest option?
Robert
>
> cch
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@google
Dear Sage devel
jsmath image fonts seem to be broken for Sage 4.3 (jsmath-image-
fonts-1.4.p2). Any idea what hapened?
Robert Marik
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Fo
On 27 pro, 23:06, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Dear Sage devel
>
> jsmath image fonts seem to be broken for Sage 4.3 (jsmath-image-
> fonts-1.4.p2). Any idea what hapened?
>
> Robert Marik
O.K. I found the source problem. There is bad path. The install script
has th
Dear sage-devel,
can you confirm this behavior of sage notebook as a bug?
when in Home (i.e. I have a list of worksheets) in folder Active, with
one worksheet running
* If I check the box of running worksheet and click Stop, nothing
happens. Reloading page shows worksheet still as running.
* If
On 28 pro, 07:39, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
> Which versions of Firefox and Sage?
Tested on Windows Vista (Firefox 3.0.16, K-meleon, Opera) and Debian
(Epiphany) on two servers with Sage 4.3 (sagenb.org and sage server at
Mendel university - sage compiled from sources)
The buttons Archive, Delete an
On 28 pro, 11:01, pipedream wrote:
> But when I open a worksheet, or when I click File>Print in the
> notebook menu, I still get
> "It looks like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I
> will try to keep going, but it could get ugly."
>
What happens if you switch to jsmath image
cmsy10
drwxr-xr-x 4 marik marik 4096 Aug 15 2005 cmti10
drwxr-xr-x 4 marik marik 4096 Dec 26 23:50 msbm10
Robert
On 28 pro, 11:19, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:08:30AM -0800, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> > What happens if you switch to jsmath ima
Dear sage devel
I have two suggestions for jsmath in
1. The text \newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}} is inserted to each TeX
formula shown by "show" command. Why not to define this command in
preamble? Something like inserting into preamble
jsMath.Macro('Bold','\\mathbf{#1}',1)
2. What about to
Hi, I would try to copy manualy the directories cmbx10 cmex10 cm-
fonts cmmi10 cmr10 cmsy10 cmti10 to the directory where msbm10 is
present. i.e. /usr/local/src/sage-4.3/local/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/sagenb-0.4.8-py2.6.egg/sagenb/data/jsmath/fonts
I did not test new spkg (...p3.spkg) f
/usr/local/src/sage-4.3/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/
sagenb-0.4.8-py2.6.egg/sagenb/data/jsmath/fonts
This suggests that your fonts are on bad place. The value should be
more than 90 MB
Robert
On 28 pro, 11:57, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Hi, I would try to copy manualy th
courses at January 4 wihch will use Sage and this is
annoying. On the other had, it would be nice to work with version with
fixed http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7756
Many thanks
Robert Marik
On 28 pro, 11:03, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 28 pro, 07:39, Pat LeSmithe
THnks for your suggestions,
On 31 pro, 04:26, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> On 12/30/2009 01:31 PM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> > I did more tests - Sage 4.2. is the last version where deleting and
> > stopping workseehts via buttons from "Home" folder works for me.
>
>
On 31 pro 2009, 09:22, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>
> Does not help either.
Does not help even if I use the install script in sagenb sources
directory to install changewd version. Any other idea?
Many thanks
Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@goo
On 1 led, 15:58, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 06:14 PM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> > On 31 pro 2009, 09:22, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> >> Does not help either.
> > Does not help even if I use the install script in sagenb sources
> > directory
On 1 led, 19:50, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Error: X is null
> Source file:http://www.sagenb.org/javascript/sage/main.js
> Line: 374
The same problem with Firefox 3.5.6
Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this g
On 1 led, 20:02, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 1 led, 19:50, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>
> > Error: X is null
> > Source file:http://www.sagenb.org/javascript/sage/main.js
> > Line: 374
>
> The same problem with Firefox 3.5.6
And the same e
On 3 led, 17:08, Vincent D <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I aim to construct a french translation of the notebook (with french
> tutorial) on
>
> http://sage.irem.univ-mrs.fr:8000
>
> Is there any attempt of multi-language support for it ?
Hi, this is not answer, simply comment.
Dear sage-devel
If I run (with checked button "Typeset")
maxima("taylor(z*sin(x*y), [x,y,z],[0,pi/2,1], 8)")
in notebook in Sage 4.3, the output window is too small and I can see
only small part of the expression. Is it a bug in CSS style or
somwhere else?
Robert
--
To post to this group, sen
Dear sage-devel
when doing in notebook
sage: show('x^2')
or
sage: show(type(factor))
I get error Unknown control sequence '\texttt'
When I try
sage:'x^2'
with checked "Typeset" button I get
\newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}\hbox{x^2}
which is not valid LaTeX expression (supperscript outside
Dear sage-devel
the following (definite) integral is not evaluated by maxima and show
() command should return the same unevaluated integral in TeX
notation. I think this was the case in previous versions. On Sage 4.3.
I get th following
input: integrate(1/(1+sqrt(x)),x,0,1).show()
output: \int
Hello all,
Sage changes expression which is converted from Maxima. As a
consequence, the linear term in taylor polynomial is allway expanded
into f'(a)*x+const instead of f'(a)*(x-a)+f(a).
Can someone explain this behavior? How to get rid of this?
See the code below and trac http://trac.sagemath
On 16 led, 07:42, Robert Miller wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> sage-4.3.1.rc0 is finally here. This should be a good base version for
> Bug Days, and closes a good deal of tickets. I thought it would be
> good to plan on an rc1 with just the ticket to fix building on OS X
> 10.6 (thoughts?). Also, reve
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
