On 19 lis, 04:47, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [x==r1] would be consistent with the multivariable case; I like that > > better than True or [x==x], for example. > > I think that makes sense, especially with the to_poly_solve update > recently merged, which uses that syntax. Robert, perhaps the > inequality patch should return x==r1 as well instead of 'all' in a > similar situation, then? Just a thought. But don't patch Maxima - > just catch it on the Sage end.
This could be, but the inequality solvers in Maxima never return (I think) r1, r2, .... What about x>-Infinity ? Robert > > - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
