On 19 lis, 07:35, "ma...@mendelu.cz" <ma...@mendelu.cz> wrote:
> > [x==r1] would be consistent with the multivariable case; I like that
> > better than True or [x==x], for example.
>
> Does this mean [x==r1] when called for the first time, [x==r2] when
> for the secod time and so on?
>

Do not know where to find the next free variable. I will patch in such
a way that it returns [x==r1] in all cases and
([x=r1],[]) for multiplicities:True.
O.K.?

Is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7491  (I was not able
to find related ticket, perhaps never reported)

Robert

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to