built fine on amd64 hardy heron but this test failed:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/modules/free_module.py
Total time for all tests: 5285.8 seconds
Please see /home/wdj/sagefiles/sage-3.1.2.rc2/tmp/test.log for the
complete log from this test.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Thank you for starting this!
I corrected a minor typo or 2 and added stuff for the meataxe section.
If Michael accepts the latest patch by Robert Miller then that should be added.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since the 3.1.2.final is near, I star
On amd64 hardy heron, builds finds and all tests passed.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 8:59 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> we are getting very close now. We fixed a bunch of blocker doctest
> issues and also fixed a long standing memleak in the number field
> code. Anothe
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I did a little advertisement for Sage on one Czech linux journal here:
>
> http://www.root.cz/clanky/softwarova-sklizen-17-9-2008/#sage
>
> But they wrongly read from the Sage webpages, that Sage is using the
> "
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:57 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought I'd mention that using ffmpeg and Sage/singular/gfan/tachyon
> I was able to finish the little pilot project I had in mind: taking a
> 5d Groebner fan, intersecting it with a hyperplane, rotating it in 4d,
> and ani
ciber cafe, or hotel
lounge with WiFi.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/
Fixed now. Thanks!
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Following suggestions from #1389, here's a possible typo on
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>
> [1] Change
>
> "or education-related idea
I second Martin's congratulations!
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:20 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It can be done:
>
> $ uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-6.0 sage-PC 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2008-06-12 19:34 i686 Cygwin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/sage312
> $ ./sage
>
essage [Reviewed by Mike Hansen]
> #4099: Jason Merrill: Fix documentation for point2d, line2d, ...
> [Reviewed by Mike Hansen]
> #4100: Robert Bradshaw: comparison with None extraordinarily slow
> [Reviewed by John Cremona]
> #4103: Jason Grout: Delete the cmap option for vector field
lf.__pari_bnf_certified = True
/home/dmharvey/gen.pyx in sage.libs.pari.gen._pari_trap (sage/libs/
pari/gen.c:33124)()
PariError: not enough precomputed primes, need primelimit ~ (35)
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups
that
>> Sage does not do yet and it does it almost as fast as Magma (less than
>> one second, 0.89 sec the longest yet, meanwhile Magma does it in
>> almost 0 seconds).
>
> I assume this is a typo?
>
>> David Joyner have checked the results of this program compared t
y, what it's telling you is
> that it needs primes up to a primelimit, and then it doesn't actually
> put in the primelimit. (This is a bug in our processing of Pari's
> error messages.) It's then saying that this is PariError #35. The
> effect is awesome, though
g to the new coercion model
> [Reviewed by Mike Hanson]
> #4129: Martin Albrecht: add support for ntl.mat_GF2 [Reviewed by
> Robert Bradshaw]
> #4151: Robert Bradshaw: implementation of Dickman's function [Reviewed
> by David Loeffler]
> #4155: Craig Citro: Speed up totally rea
for details.
At the moment, the plan is for the tree to look like
combinat
|-- crystals
|-- designs
|-- matrices
|-- posets
|-- root_system
|-- sf
and
designs
|-- __init__.py
|-- all.py
|-- block_design.py
|-- incidence_structures.py
Any comments or suggestions?
- David Joyner
g information in a
non-GNU-specific way? I guess if I can do this then I can make
everyone happy.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For mor
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As part of the conversion of the Sage documentation to Sphinx, I
> propose that Sphinx and its dependencies (Docutils, Pygments, and
> Jinja) be added to Sage. Here are brief descriptions for what each of
>
here, uses your
> code,
> otherwise it doesn't. David Harvey -- what do you think?
Yeah why the hell not.
As long as someone who understands these algorithms (me: not yet)
signs off on precision bounds etc.
Not sure if you'll ge
gt; quotient_ring.py [Reviewed by Alex Ghitza]
> #3316: Pablo De Napoli: Fix a bug and improve documentation in
> jordan_form [Reviewed by Alex Ghitza]
> #3659: Mike Hansen: Upgrade IPython to 0.8.4 [Reviewed by Michael
> Abshoff]
> #3799: Emily Kirkman: degree sequence should not be a
Makes sense, no objections to your Sage suggestion.
The reason I am emailing is that you webpage
http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/preprints.html
points to "Lifting and base change for automorphic forms, 2008"
but there is no link. I was just curious to flip through it that's all.
No hurry or
Sorry for the OT email, I meant for that to go to Alex only,
not the whole list!
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:01 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Makes sense, no objections to your Sage suggestion.
>
> The reason I am emailing is that you webpage
> http://www.ms.unime
found. Either:
(1) rename /opt/local and /sw, or
(2) change PATH and DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
(Once Sage is built, you can restore them.)
*
Would it be excessively uncivilised to *automatically* change the
path during the build process....?
>
> Would it be excessively uncivilised to *automatically* change the
> path during the build process?
Well, the kind of people who will come across it will be capable of
changing their own path---and maybe sensitive. And, it might require
root permissions.
D
> >
--~--~-~--~-
On Oct 5, 2008, at 5:32 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2008, at 02:11 , David Philp wrote:
>
>>> Would it be excessively uncivilised to *automatically* change the
>>> path during the build process?
>>
>> Well, the kind of people who wi
have been addressed anyway with the patch
> in trac ticket #4127 (that went into Sage 3.1.3.alpha0), but Michael
> Abshoff and David Philp should please have another look at the issue.
>
> If I can be of any help (testing, more discussion), just let me know,
> I've got both a PPC
Java compiler works...
This is on Mac OSX Leopard, after moving /opt/local/ to /opt/
local.back
by hand.
I actually have had a javac process running for 3 hours...
Any suggestions?
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-
P.S. I get the same behavior for 3.1.2.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
[Reviewed by Mike Hansen]
> #4234: Minh Nguyen: typos in programming guide [Reviewed by Michael
> Abshoff]
> #4235: Minh Nguyen: typos in and enhancement to installation guide
> [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
> #4238: David Fu, Robert Bradshaw: option to create local .so file
> for .spyx
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:57 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Spies Sage Development Prize is an annual award worth $500 that will be
> given each year to a person who makes passionate and inspiring contributions
> to the development of the Sage Mathematical Softwa
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:58 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 11, 6:54 am, Matthias Meulien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
>> I successfully compiled Sage 3.1.2 from source. But I had troubles
>> with many commands... I finaly realized that all functions
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all, here is a short update about the sagemath.org website.
>
> First, when i started to monitor the access, the usual number of
> visits per day was 800-1000. It still varies, but you can think of
> 2000 visits p
All tests passed on amd64 hardy heron.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> the is finally (and hopefully) the last release before 3.1.3. Unless
> something major is broken this tarball will be identical (modulo
> version string and some poten
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, do you vote
>
> [X ] Yes, include TinyMCE as a standard package
> [ ] Yes, include TinyMCE as an optional package
> [ ] No, do not include TinyMCE as a package
>
Also, if this is added I hope that somewhere the t
What is wrong with using the piecewise defined functions for the unit
step function?
You are right though, delta functions are not implemented yet. Of
course, they are not
really functions either, so how they should be implemented is an issue as well.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Ronan Paix
My copy of 31.3.rc0 got hosed somehow using sage -upgrade.
I have no idea what I did wrong.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3:
>
> #4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.p
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3:
>
> #4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.py to
> 100%, and fix typos [Reviewed by John Cremona]
> #4272: Michael Abshoff: add the files
I wonder if any of this code sponsored by NAG is truely FOSS.
I didn't see any licensing statements though I didn't dig very deep.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Hazem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Just came across this code which may be of relevance:
>
> http://www.nag.co.uk/Projects/Frisco
There is a typo on the page "Matrix of Frobenius on Hyperelliptic
Curves". Where you say "We do the same calculation over the bigger
field F_{101^4}", it's not doing anything over an extension field.
It's computing in Z/101^4 Z.
david
On Oct 15, 2008, a
Thanks Harald for adding the link to
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main?cmd=manifest;manifest=-1;path=/sage/
But the changeset indicates this is almost a month old. Is
there a way to get the more recent version?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
t; try and give feedback For a source tarball and a sage.math only
> tarball see
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> Merged in Sage 3.2.alpha0:
>
> #1323: Robert Miller: generate all subspaces of a v
I'll have to wait until I get home from work to test it out but the
patch looks like you've added a lot of nice functionality. My original
thought was
to include more of the legend options in the method itself (instead of having
several methods which set them) but you have so many options,
that wo
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 22 October 2008, Simon King wrote:
>> Dear Team,
>>
>> at SD 10, Martin Albrecht and I implemented the F5 algorithm according
>> to John Perry's pseudocode. The two implementations are at
>> http://wiki.s
This looks beautiful. It looks fine to me. Some grammatical ideas:
(a) I think you can say "open source" instead of "open-source, even though
what you have is correct.
(b) Possibly "Python based" should be Python-based".
(c) "Numerous methods ..." Could be worded "Use the numerous software package
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:42 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is very nice. I think softening the graph has helped a lot.
>
> One final nit-pick is that I am pretty sure it is more correct to
> hyphenate open-source. I briefly worked as a copyeditor, and before I
> was fired I tr
ive feedback For a source tarball and a sage.math only
> tarball see
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> Merged in Sage 3.2.alpha0:
>
> #1323: Robert Miller: generate all subspaces of a vector space/
>
(1) Sage also does FFT via the GSL. I guess they didn't try that,
but I would imaginge they would be fast since they are in C.
(2) I'm not sure what a toolbox actually *is*. Something like an
optional package with a nice gui interface?
(3) Related to this thread, I just got an email from Cesar (
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 23, 2008, at 16:01 , David Joyner wrote:
>
>>
>> The install failed right off the bad on a OS10.4intel macbook:
>>
>> new-host-3:/Volumes/G-DRIVE-MINI/sage
r" does the cythonization in
> parallel using pyprocessing [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
> #3901: William Stein: automated doctesting elementary number theory
> book [Reviewed by Mike Hansen]
> #3923: Timothy Clemans: notebook -- convert existing templates to
> Jinja templates
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 27, 11:10 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On amd64 hardy heron, build went fine but there were a lot of errors
>> in sage -testall.
>> log poste
Though I'm in favor of making things easier for the debian
process (both (a) to add more Sage users and (b) in the perhaps
wildly overly optimistic hope that one day Canonical will support Sage
somehow), I wonder if it is possible for someone sufficiently
skillful to write a script which crawls th
Forwarded. (It was sent to the wrong list.)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:34 PM
Subject: [SAGEdev] calling python from lisp
To:
Cc: sage-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an articl
eview the code, at which point it can be merged
into the current Sage release.
David
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Henryk Trappmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I developed a package to work with infinite power series.
> You can work with the power series
As far as I can see, it looks really great!
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:28 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am about to give a talk about Sage, any feedback is appreciated. I
> am using Keynote on a mac, so the pdf does not look as good, but
> presumably more of you can take a look t
Unfortunately, your licensing restrictions seem to be incompatible with
Sage.
All Sage code must be GPL compatible.
See
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tut/node6.html
and
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html
for information on the Sage goals and GPL2 license.
However, you are free t
On the other hand,
sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)","()"])
Group( [ (1,2), () ] )
sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)"])
Group( [ (1,2) ] )
sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)","()"]) == gap.Group(["(1,2)"])
True
so GAP does allow the identity as a member of the list of generators.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Minh Nguyen
I think Permutation (which is part of
Mike Hansen's combinat code) happens to play well with
PermutationGroupElement but it is really designed for something else.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:00 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 5:37 am, "David Joyner&
In principle, it's possible to insert a try except clause into the plot command,
so that it would
try:
plot(x^2,2,10)
except:
plot(lambda x:real(zeta(x)),2,10)
There might be more efficient solutions though.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I
ed by Michael Abshoff]
> #788: Arnaud Bergeron: fix "random low order bits" doctests to use
> "..." [Reviewed by Dan Drake, Michael Abshoff]
> #2039: John Palmieri: add sage version const [Reviewed by Michael
> Abshoff]
> #2103: David Loeffler, Craig Citro: equiv
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 7:10 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It appears that the doc test is hanging on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
>> Is there something in sage -t
r not the SAGE install has moved [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
> #788: Arnaud Bergeron: fix "random low order bits" doctests to use
> "..." [Reviewed by Dan Drake, Michael Abshoff]
> #2039: John Palmieri: add sage version const [Reviewed by Michael
> Abshoff]
> #2103:
On the third pass of sage -testall, it appears that sage -testall is also
hanging on tut.tex, but when I reran the verbose option it passed fine.
On to pass #4
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:05 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that sage -testall is also hanging o
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 at 05:43AM -0400, David Joyner wrote:
>> I went through 5 passes, and sage -testall kept locking up at various
>> places, so I rebuilt
>> Sage. I also tested to see if the tarball
devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
it froze at this line:
Trying:
f(y=Integer(7))###line 4372:_sage_>>> f(y=7)
Expecting:
x^3 + x
This is on amd64 ubuntu 8.10.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:17 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the third pass of
oing remarkably well at keeping a balance between ease-of-
use
for beginners and high-end users.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 at 02:58AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
>> I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition
>> too. Very good.
>
> I was totally not expecting 4chan to ap
I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition too.
Very good.
Someone was just asking me a question related to the program
you used to create the graph of on page 26. Is this a graph of
Sage classes? What is the program/command called?
Also, what font are you using? I lik
Agreed!
I am still hoping to replace the document const.tex by
cookbook.tex. I'm happy to assemble the chapters but
even happier if someone else does:-)
I'm not sure what the correct procedure is, so I put a
chapter up on trac http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3624
Maybe a wiki page is b
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 5, 3:45 pm, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
>> crypto:
>>
>> http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
>
> wo
Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?
As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
I am personally happy with the GFDL 1.3, but some might find it
a bit of overkill.
Comments? Unless people
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 9:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?\
>
> -1 - the will only cause more
>
> As usual sources and a sage.math binary is in
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> Merged in Sage 3.2.alpha3:
>
> #4035: Martin Albrecht: fix optional doctests for multivariate
> polynomials [Reviewed by Michael Abs
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:51 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With amd64 intrepid ibex, it builds fine but sage -testall
> seems to have the same locking-up issues as with the alpha2 version.
> I can ctrl c to get out of the doc files, and it will pass on to testing
erstandings of Sage are all welcome. Typos, minor
> reorganizations and inconsistencies can probably wait. ;-)
>
> Rob Beezer
>
> On Nov 5, 8:03 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Harald Schilly
>>
>>
>
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:51 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> With amd64 intrepid ibex, it builds fine but sage -testall
>> seems to have the sa
separation of categories from the class
hierarchy was just
the first step.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this
I know this is late, but all tests passed and the build went fine on
my work machine, which runs amd64 hardy heron.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:24 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here is 3.2.rc0 and I have to confess that I cheated: I did build this
> on numerous platf
> I'm really glad I'm not writing everything in SAGE from scratch!
Definitely.
I can put this in this weekend, but if someone doesn't get to it
sooner.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@g
to do this because I haven't changed my script and it
only just starting doing this now. I guess someone updated the code to
recognise timing commands in indented blocks.
Is this behaviour going to be permanent? i.e. should I just change the
variable name, or is this
at "time" didn't work in scripts. Now it does. I think you should
> change
> your code and view "time" as a reserved word (along with "load" and
> "attach").
Ok, that's fine, thanks.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~--
. Something else really bad is going on there.
How on earth do you divide a *polynomial mod n* by 9 and get a dense
*rational* polynomial? What's the definition of f?
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co
and improving whatever
exists as of SAGE-2.0.
3. Attention to elliptic curves over finite fields, and/or any p-adic
rings that exist.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
ic,
etc. But if I run dir(sage.rings) it doesn't show any of the padic
packages. What do I need to edit besides sage/rings/all.py in order to
make things work? And how should I import things at the top of my
source files?
Thanks,
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To pos
They implement a somewhat modified version of the interfaces in the
folder. The folder also includes other classes that we haven't written
yet.
David
On Jan 25, 4:12 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:03:39 -0800, David Roe &
I didn't know that the code in SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/rings/padics
was actually working. I'll take a look at it and see if I can just
incorporate actual source into that framework.
David
On Jan 25, 5:22 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Th
It looks like you fixed the import statements at the top of padic_ring
and padic_ring_element. If that's the case, I can change the source
code in those files and things will be okay, correct? Once the
padic_ring code is generally working I can try to add padic field code.
David
On Jan
Hi,
The mploc might require further development to be stable in odd
characteristics, but
at least aims to be a standard p-adic C library. I am very interested
in seeing p-adics
developed, so please CC me:
David R. Kohel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and my student:
Hamish Law <[EMAIL PROTECTE
ot a UFD? If the base ring is a
field, then I have no problems with that at all.
> I also don't really think that valuation is the best term to use
> for the
> integer method. I think it would be better named "ord", but I
> don't know if
> that
uot; is the integer required to compute that valuation, but
> it's being a
> bit picky perhaps.
Oh I see. I suppose what you're describing is the more common usage.
I think I use "valuation" more frequently to refer to the "additive"
version (i.e. your &quo
ctly 0 arguments (1
given)
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-deve
are soon going to need a dedicated machine to
handle these public notebooks and the interactive documentation.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would be helpful if somebody would try out the doc browser by
> going to http://sage.math.washington.edu:8100/ and clicking
> on Documentation (in the upper right), and tell me what you think.
>
I think it is really great. Good job!
> I'm aware that if you br
Timothy Clemans wrote:
> I think there are some free online textbooks like one on calculus from
> MIT that could be transformed into interactive SAGE notebook
> applications. Think of a high-schooler learning about systems of
> equations and being able to plug in a many examples with the details
>
evaluated a cell using shift-enter, the evaluation worked, but the
page instantly scrolled right back to the top, so I had to scroll
back down (using the scroll bar) every time I evaluated anything.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send ema
The scipy mirror is being updated as we speak. Should be done
in a few minutes.
On 1/28/07, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/28/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have released SAGE-2.0. Enjoy!!
>
> is it in a different location?
>
>
> tlon[sr
app that solves magic squares.
>>
>>
>> On 1/30/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> William Stein wrote it on an airplane.
>>>
>>> On 1/30/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hel
will have some thoughts after letting it percolate around for two
weeks.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this gro
ou might
also want to rewrite the SAGE code to translate to PARI and then back
to NTL. It's going to be slow, but the Z[x] class will be rewritten
using FLINT fairly soon, so it's not a long term problem.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this grou
taken.
On the other hand I just had a brief look at the quaddouble source
code, and it doesn't automatically use squaring code if appropriate.
(The functions are in there, but you have to call them directly.)
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
p.
If there are enough of us, then I would be *really* happy if someone
could do a "Mercurial for Dummies" talk at SD3. Just go through a few
typical workflows, and explain what the hell is going on in each one.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
On Feb 7, 2007, at 4:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
> I would be happy to give a mercurial for dummies talk.
That would be wonderful.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gr
system-specific implementations; if it can't work
it out, it should report a single processor as the default
implementation.
David
On Feb 7, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Jason Martin wrote:
>
> On Linux, grep /proc/cpuinfo for lines beginning with "processor".
> Take the line wit
501 - 600 of 6542 matches
Mail list logo
