Thanks but this version is lacking a copyright notice, license (GPL?),
and docstrings.
See special.py
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main/file/59538ebc8f3b/sage/functions/special.py
(or pretty much any other Python module in SAGE) for an example of
how such things could look. If it has solved Wes
This one is better, but still lacking the licence, for example. Also, did you
see if sage -t isolve.sage passes?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:35 AM, SBP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've just added some description so it show when typing isolve?
>
> Cheers.
>
>
d of course a caller is always free to directly call _diff instead
of diff, if they know exactly what they want.
NOTE: conspicuously absent is the **kwds parameter in the above spec.
I don't know quite how to do this in an efficient way. I'm worried
the overhead will kill us in the l
t thread. I don't
think it's that closely related to the "harmonizing derivatives..."
thread. I am replying on this thread so that you can easily find this
reply.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel
Okay
So pretty much everyone seems to like the proposal, and from
discussion on IRC and sage-devel we're going to use derivative()
instead of diff(), which is fine with me.
I'm going to start coding as soon as I discuss with martin about the
have_ring parameter issues....
in range(100)])
sage: timeit("g = f*f")
625 loops, best of 3: 26.2 µs per loop
i.e. it's six times faster if the modulus is composite.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fr
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:39 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 2, 12:22 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Very strange.
> >
> > After getting the first failed install from source (in my last ema
so that I
don't have to worry about the mpz_t not fitting in a long.
David
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> These methods set_si & set_str violate immutability:
> sage: n=300
> sage: n.set_si(12)
> sage: n
&g
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /sage_trac/.
Reason: Error reading from remote server
?
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
t you
don't have to rewrite the overflow checking each time: I've done that over
and over).
David
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 5:42 am, "David Roe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think they should
Fixing the ubiquitous accessing of .value would be far more work that it's
worth. The main functionality that I would like is a get_si() with bounds
checking. Given that, I think having a set_si as well is reasonable.
David
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL P
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug.
> Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy
> enough with to share with people. I have added instructions on the
> wiki at http://wiki.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:56 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:32 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
I had failures in tut.tex (in particular, reduced_groebner_bases
failed), const.tex and
the following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/groebner_fan.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot.py
+
On Tue,
I agree with the choice of _sage_init_. By default this can return
self._repr_(), but should be overridden in cases like matrix.
David
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> _sage_init_ sounds like the right solution. The problem is tha
to me. In fact:
sage: RR(f.integrate(x, 0, 0.1))
0.0996676643523801
sage: RR(f.integrate(x, 0, 1/10))
0.0996676642903363
What's going on here?
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from t
shes on OSX 10.5
>Intel - this is a work around fix
> #2391: William Stein: module docstring bug running
>filename.sage from the command line
> #2392: Nick Alexander: generic univariate polynomial has
>no discriminant function
> #2395: Simon K
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:14 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:13 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On an amd64 bit ubuntu 7.04 linux machine:
> >
> > The following tests failed:
> >
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Andrzej Chrzęszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: March 5, 2008 6:23:53 PM EST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sage-devel "exact" numerical integration
>
> Dear David
> Try
>
> sage: maxima_co
On Mar 6, 2008, at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%.
> This is one of the more
> difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a "Sage Doc
> Days" this Sunday.
> Whose interested
Will you be publishing a list of which modules are lacking acceptable
doctest coverage?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%.
> This is one of the more
> difficult goals for Sage
Can you tell me where the license to fluid is located? I downloaded
from http://fluidapp.com/
the zip file. There is a subdirectory for licenses but the fluid
license isn't in it only
the (BSD-like) licenses for the components.
BTW, it appears to be Leopard only and the website says is similar to
There are tons of examples of things in the sage library: just look for .pyx
files. In particular, many of the matrix files are written in cython: look
in sage.matrix.
For loops, use the syntax:
cdef Py_ssize_t i
cdef long n = 17
for i from 0 <= i < n:
do_stuff()
Hope this helps.
Dav
adjust
mutate
modulate
alter
metamorphose
morph
renovate
transform
perturb
animate
vivify
Well I never even heard of "vivify" before.
Another option might be to try to come up with a word that emphasises
the controls themselves, like "lever" or "slider" or something.
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:53 AM, David Harvey wrote:
>> I'm trying to decide if Sage's new "mathematica manipulate" like
>> functionality should
>> be called "manipulate" or "interact".
Oh and by the way, it looks
Cool!
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> in a moment of procrastination I came up with this:
> https://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1728/
>
> Hopefully somebody can put this banality to good use within SAGE :)
> Best,
> --
> Hector
>
> >
>
Note that the function that is called by "^" is __xor__. So you can already
do a.__xor__(b). If you want to write the function that David describes,
calling a.__xor__(b) is better than using eval.
David
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:34 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Another solution (avoiding the preparer) is to simply define
sage: def xor(a,b): return eval("%s^%s"%(a,b))
:
sage: xor(1,0)
1
sage: xor(1,1)
0
which mimics the native Python behavior:
Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Oct 5 2007, 13:50:07)
[GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2
For those in arithmetical algebraic geometry, the ratpoints
program might be of interest. It is GPL'd (GPLv3) and written in C.
Some documentation was just posted to the math arxivs:
Title: Documentation for the ratpoints program
Authors: Michael Stoll
Categories: math.NT
Comments: 14 pages
MSC-c
the number of
> > failed doctests and exact nature of failures
> > #2287: Michael Abshoff: error installing rubiks related
> >to location of install
> > #2493: Jaap Spies: Updated experimental vtk spkg
> >(vtk-5.0.4.spkg)
> > #2495: Jaap
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:50 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 24, 1:13 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ubuntu 7.10, amd64:
> > ./sage -tp 1 devel/sage/sage
> > gave
> > The following tests
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:38 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
> > "Rerunning sage -t" yields all tests pass. I was reporting "sage -tp".
>
> I know ;)
>
>
>
> > Here is
> > a copy+pas
(1) over K (or any field extension). An affine
patch has
coordinate ring isomorphic to K, but we need a rank zero polynomial
ring to
be able to represent it as a polynomial ring. Otherwise schemes code
will
have to test everywhere for this and similar boundary cases
It's in progress. See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2291
David
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:28 AM, bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 1:27 pm, "David Roe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This should be pretty easy (though multiv
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the brave of heart, I have my current effort up on trac as ticket
> #2716.
>
> I hope to add a number of other things and make the polyhedral classes
> more intelligent. Again, I would appreciate any thoughts on how
e that ships different versions of packages to the ones
we normally ship, then they are on their own? Or something else?
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
finding symplectic bases
> #2668: Nick Alexander, Carl Witty: loads/dumps do not work
>with QQbar and AA
> #2672: Michael Abshoff: Fix OSX 10.5 detection code - it
>fails for the currect OSX 10.5.2
> #2674: Craig Citro, Justin Walker: Bug in modforms
>
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 30, 6:31 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > rc0 -- On every single test machine
> >sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py
> > fails.
>
> Yeah, but as Yi
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Bjake Hammersholt Roune
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am the author of the program Frobby, which does computations on
> monomial ideals. I think Sage is a great project, and I would like to
> contribute by making it possible to use Frobby as a part of Sage. M
Splitting it like this still yields a linear algorithm. If f(n) is
the time to add a list of length n, then you have
f(n) = 2*f(n/2), so f(n) is linear.
David
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Sage team,
>
> i made a few tim
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Genya Zaytman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: March 31, 2008 1:15:21 PM EDT
> To: David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Fwd: Multivariate Polynomial Factoring is Broken
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>> From: Genya Zaytma
prime factors, examples with high prime powers, examples with just a
prime, etc.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit th
put a decent patch in for this
> important function!
Perhaps if you have a bound for the size of the coefficients you
could do a modular approach. Work mod N where the coefficients are
guaranteed to be at most N. Usually I guess N will fit into a single
word, so the polynomial arithmetic will
Interesting course. Thanks for posting.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:04 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is video from lecture one of my Sage course
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-826792746508034&hl=en
>
> --
> William Stein
> Associate Professor
time: 0.06
> sage: time f = cyclotomic_polynomial(ZZ.random_element(10^5, 10^6))
> CPU times: user 0.02 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.03 s
> Wall time: 0.06
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2654
mate that's awesome.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert Dodier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Subject: [Maxima] Maxima 5.15 release branch scheduled for April 5
To: Maxima List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I am planning to make the 5.15 release branch on April 5
(prob
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Michael Brickenstein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
> Suprise, there exists a tutorial for PolyBoRi.
>
> http://polybori.sourceforge.net/doc/tutorial/index.html
>
> It is available in tex-format under
> doc/tutorial/tutorial.tex
> in our source distributio
mean? What is p supposed to be here? I get
sage: p
Generic element of a structure
I think the __init__ call gets redirected to Element.__init__, which
just sets the parent. In my opinion, this constructor call should be
disallowed somehow. Unless there's something about the new coercion
ually sit down to implement printer objects.
David
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:33 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> I briefly looked over your coercion model.
>
> _repr_ This is the easiest way to define how your object prints
>It should take a
That's the plan. Though I'll have to ask around to figure out how to
determine if _repr_ is being called from the notebook or iPython.
David
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> > Thanks for your input.
have
which would could
be run from the sage notebook, and what complementary solutions sage
and WIMS have
found which could be mutually borrowed.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
Genya Zaytman.)
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs:
just using comments as in
the first
example.
Even better, I could imagine exporting the worksheet as a latex file
and conversely
reading a marked up latex file as a workshop.
Is this feasible?
--David
On Apr 2, 11:08 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm sick at home today, and this actual
This is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2780
david
On Apr 2, 2008, at 12:57 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> You are right. As a list, F has three elements of which the first is
> (2,1) -- i.e. 2 to the power 1 -- but when the list is converted to a
> Factorization typ
])
sage: I.groebner_basis()
[boom]
Is this supposed to work? It's just a multivariate poly over a finite
field.
I've put it up at:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2789
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
> ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
> which function goes with which type.
>
> How about we unify the interface?
>
>
On Apr 3, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Joel B. Mohler wrote:
> I intentionally made 0.digits() return [] because that seems to me
> the most
> consistent mathematical thing to do.
+1
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to s
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:24 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just starting to write a book on Sage for an undergrad course.
> It's supposed
> to have a "narrative" and "personal" feel, much more so than the
> tutorial or other
> books. I guess it's a little like
Yes, this was discussed in sage-delev already and added to
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SAGE_in_the_News
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c954feab66c82d40/430215969bdf7556?lnk=gst&q=sage+in+the+news#430215969bdf7556
(Or search "Sage in the news?" March 15.)
On Fri, Apr 4
The procedure is (well, more-or-less) described on the pages
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/html/prog/node72.html
http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracGuidelines
My suggestion is to email sage-support and
(a) report the problem (include OS, example, and sage version)
(b) ask if it is recommended to create
e,
but it seems to work for me (OSX 10.4.11, intel):
http://math.harvard.edu/~dmharvey/Colloquy.app.zip
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECT
:
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 9:06 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > (This was posted to the SIGSAM list. Posted here FYI.)
> >
> > 2008 CALL FOR NOMINATIONS
> >
> > ACM/SIGSAM Richard D. Jenks Memorial Prize
> > for Excellence
#2764: Minh Nguyen, Mike Hansen: fix typos in documentation
> #2765: Robert Miller: bug in graph_isom, Hoffman-Singleton
>constructor
> #2766: Jason Grout, Michael Abshoff: graph adjacency matrix
>defaults to sparse
> #2767: Carig Citro: error in elem.matrix(F) and ele
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Daniel Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I've posted a patch here:
>
> http://match.stanford.edu/bump/patches/weylgroup2.patch
>
> I can make a trac ticket but I'm posting it here temporarily
> first.
>
> This patch implements Weyl groups as a derived class
I wonder if we want to include maxima 5.15 in sage 3.0?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert Dodier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:36 PM
Subject: [Maxima] Maxima 5.15.0 release candidate 1
To: Maxima List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I've resolved the build pro
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http
Hector told me (in a separate email) about DOLFIN
http://www.fenics.org/wiki/FEniCS_Project
which is built on numpy. Although I had trouble installing it,
I'm wondering if anyone else on this list has been able to try it out?
Cross-posting to sage-devel.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Hector Vi
lpha2:
>
> #358: John Cremona: padic_height_pairing_matrix computes too
> many heights
> #530: Martin Albrecht: leak in Matrix_integer_dense__solve_iml
> exposed by matrix/strassen.pyx
> #2316: Yi Qiang: dsage.start_all() can leave zombie workers
>
I'm back from my three week trip to the west coast and will take a look at this.
David
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Kiran Kedlaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jen Balakrishnan spent time with some of the usual suspects during the
> Arizona Winter School tracking down
/server/notebook/interact.py
Total time for all tests: 4749.8 seconds
Posted test.log to
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/test.log
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:24 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Installed fine on ubuntu 7.10 amd64. My machine hangs randomly (a
This is great news! My opinion of google was good before but this
really improves it. Thanks very much for putting this together. It will
be very useful for coding theory.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:05 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted the following on my blog, but am
tries to numerically approximate the entries and make
a new matrix out of them.
This is now ticket 2857.
David
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:32 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm running into problems with coercing to complexes or reals in
> matrices:
&
ing
> to try to summarize the main points of the discussion, first so
> that we
> have a record of it, and also so it can continue and we can see
> what we
> can/should do about it.
>
> 1. At the moment, NumberFieldFractionalIdeal inherits from
> Ideal_generic, which David
al(7)
> [ 1 1 1]
> [10170 5928]
> [ 3676320 5925744000 31101226041600]
Ugh. I don't like any of them. Even valuation is wrong.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Yi,
This sounds like a much better approach than what I did, but when I
run that I get an error message about not being able to find the objc
module?
david
On Apr 9, 2008, at 2:54 AM, Yi Qiang wrote:
>
> Hey,
> I thought this was a great idea but I found the patching Colloquy
&
release schedule.
I'm too tired to try it now, will try tomorrow.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
30: Martin Albrecht: leak in Matrix_integer_dense__solve_iml
> exposed by matrix/strassen.pyx
> #2316: Yi Qiang: dsage.start_all() can leave zombie workers
>around
> #2346: Robert Bradshaw: Sage needs a simple api for interaction
>with other applications
>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:40 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Harald Schilly
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 10, 2:14 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > A link to 7zip.org right by the archive or in the install in
.e. click on
it (note that many users at this stage might never have seen an
apache-served directory listing)
I reckon it needs to be WAY simpler than this. It needs to be a
single click from the main page, labelled "Download Sage for
Micro
I think Willem fixed this bug. I've made the same change a few other
places and added a doctest.
David
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Kiran Kedlaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jen Balakrishnan spent time with some of the usual suspects during the
> Arizona Winter
No, I forgot to change it back. Use the patch I posted instead, which
changes all the eis_shift_a's back to eis_shift. The p-adics folder
passes sage -t now.
David
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:53 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 11, 12:35 am, "
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:13 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Sage Devel,
>
> 1. There will be a Sage Days in January 2009 in San Diego, CA. The
> exact dates haven't
> been determined yet, though it will probably be fairly early in January.
AFAIK, there is no word yet
On the other hand, using a leading zero to indicate octal is a fairly
standard convention in computer science. And it's nice to minimize
these kinds of differences between Python ints and Sage Integers.
David
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
any of these would be better than the current behavior, which is
> to return 0.
Interesting that's not what happens in my install of sage 2.11. I
get:
sage: F9. = GF(9)
sage: F81. = GF(81)
sage: F81(a)
[.]
: n=17606600 must be < self.order()
david
--~--~-~--~~-
Perhaps this has been fixed already?
sage: version()
'SAGE Version 3.0.alpha2, Release Date: 2008-04-06'
sage: import sage.graphs
sage: import sage.graphs.graph_isom
sage:
sage: G=Graph("[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@KN~_^}?~{")
e sizes that Willem is
> talking about:
>
> > ConwayPolynomial(3,100);
>^
> Runtime error in 'ConwayPolynomial': A conway polynomial for GF(3^100) is not
> known
>
> David Roe and I (and probably some other people) talked about this way
>
Grrr... I clicked reply, and then tried to click on the text field to
begin typing, and it scrolled down at exactly the wrong moment and the
right amount so that I clicked send insteady. Sorry about that.
> David Roe and I (and probably some other people) talked about this way
> back
points throws a
>nonsensical error
> #2643: Tim Abbott, Michael Abshoff: Fix Debian Sections
> #2682: Robert Bradshaw: balanced product for generators/iterators
> #2780: Alex Ghitza: factorisation over number field has wrong unit
>part
> #2814: Car
I would prefer sage -n, because -b suggests build to me, so sage -nb
would be rebuild and then start the notebook.
David
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:29 PM, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Kiran Kedlaya <[EMAIL PR
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 6:56 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:50 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there anybody at UW that is interested in meeting with some OLPC
> > people? (I'm cc'ing this to sage-devel, beca
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:34 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:02 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 6:56 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
Hi Martin, Bill:
Thanks for these very interesting emails! Some of my reactions are below.
- David Joyner
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin,
>
> I think discussing things like off the email lists does more damage to
>
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:42 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Should we include OpenOpt in Sage:
> http://scipy.org/scipy/scikits/wiki/OpenOpt
+1
>
> I noticed it when looking at GSoC applications for the Python software
> foundation. That application is as foll
+1 from me as well. There have been a few times recently when I've
wished Sage included a component for solving linear programming or
integer programming optimization problems.
David
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 20,
ation within your code so that others can understand
what it's doing. I understand the argument that you want the writing
to be "explanation-centric" rather than "code-centric." But writing
documentation in other ways can serve to explain what you're
e case when 3.0 arrives. If you can assume the python
> language,
> why can't you assume the lisp language? If you can't assume the lisp
> language, why can you assume the python language?
We do compile python from scratch on every platform
Thank you very much for agreeing to work on this Michael.
Way down the road, thin will be a big deal i think.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:45 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William suggested I forward/post the stuff I wrote on fricas-devel
> over there, too. Since his wish is my comma
Hey,
If you want to log onto sage-devel, I'm working on coercion and had a
few things to talk about.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Installed fine and all tests passed on an ubuntu 7.10 amd64 machine.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:10 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 3.0 has been released on April 21st, 2008. It is available at
>
>http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> * About Sage (h
s faster
code for arithmetic), or whether you have to tell it explicitly. I
vaguely remember that the preconditioned division struct has a flag
for this, but I can't remember whether it gets set automatically.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this g
201 - 300 of 6542 matches
Mail list logo
