[sage-devel] Re: writing an interpeter for mathematica language

2007-12-24 Thread David
From a social point of view, I think this would be a great idea. However, Mathematica contains many functions that have no equivalent in Sage. You might find yourself re-implementing Mathematica from scratch. -David On Dec 24, 5:15 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

[sage-devel] NIKE SHOES-welcome to http://www.nikesn.com/.

2007-05-31 Thread DAVID
welcome to http://www.nikesn.com/. Products: Nike shoes We are specialized in Nike shoes manufacturing,such as Jordans1-21, Shox Series,Air Max Series,Air Force one,Dunk,Rift and so on. We have stabled and credit standing relationship with customers from all over the world. Our four advantages:1)q

[sage-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Clisp and graphics

2007-11-10 Thread David Joyner
Hi Bill: Does it make sense to build an axiom4sage package which uses the pre-installed clisp (since maxima comes with clisp) to make the axiom graphics engine? If so, do you know how long such a package would take to compile, on average? - David On 11/10/07, Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTEC

[sage-devel] Re: plotQt.c with Qt 4.3.2 + GUI for pari/gp

2007-11-12 Thread David Joyner
I tried emailing the author of mathguide several times a few years ago, with no response. Of course, my email was in English, which might have been the problem. In any case, I did not get the impression that it was open source. Either I am wrong or I presume this guy got permission from the mathgu

[sage-devel] Re: plotQt.c with Qt 4.3.2 + GUI for pari/gp

2007-11-13 Thread David Joyner
l if there is some information in with other things. Might be worth emailing Ring. If it is opensource then perhaps it could be adapted to be used as a windows SAGE gui interface? > > Fabio > > > On Nov 13, 2007 3:53 AM, William Stein < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

[sage-devel] Re: plotQt.c with Qt 4.3.2 + GUI for pari/gp

2007-11-13 Thread David Joyner
ng ring sounds like a good idea. Should > I do it? > > > > > On Nov 13, 2007 12:41 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 11/13/07, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The original Webpage says "[mathGUIde] ist Freew

[sage-devel] Re: [SAGEdev] Error building sage in Solaris 10 with gcc 4.0.2

2007-11-14 Thread David Joyner
Klas: Thanks for your report but it was sent to the wrong list. (The sf list is "closed". I'm forwarding this to the correct list.) - David Joyner On Nov 14, 2007 8:19 AM, Klas Heggemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This fails in the building of one o

[sage-devel] Re: trying to define a function and find an approximation

2007-11-15 Thread David Joyner
On Nov 15, 2007 2:49 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2007 1:45 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I discovered Sage recently and am very excited about it. In grad school, > > I came to be very good with Mathematica, and am now doing a postdoc > > where I o

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion trouble

2007-11-15 Thread David Roe
;s causing your problem. William and I have been talking about rewriting it so that residue field computes a p-maximal order and then does things appropriately, but it hasn't gotten done yet. David On Nov 15, 2007 8:57 PM, mabshoff < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion trouble

2007-11-15 Thread David Roe
I lost internet connection and then lost the traceback when my machine restarted, so if you could open a ticket on the __rpath issue, I would apprectiate it. The residue field problem is ticket 1183. David On Nov 15, 2007 9:29 PM, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I lost

[sage-devel] Power series rings

2007-11-16 Thread David Roe
ative infinity. David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs:

[sage-devel] Re: interactive widgets in the notebook

2007-11-17 Thread David Harvey
ot(sin(a*x),-3,3) instead of > plot(sin(a()*x),-3,3) ? david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http:/

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8.13 release cycle: request for reviews

2007-11-18 Thread David Harvey
+ 4]) sage: E Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + (3*a^2+2)*x + (2*a+4) over Finite Field in a of size 5^3 sage: LCM([P.order() for P in E.points()]) 32 sage: len(E.points()) 128 david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegro

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8.13 release cycle: request for reviews

2007-11-18 Thread David Harvey
On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > On Sunday 18 November 2007, David Harvey wrote: >> On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>>> #1130 >>> >>> This seems to rely on an earlier patch. (#1120?) See comments on >

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8.13 release cycle: request for reviews

2007-11-19 Thread David Harvey
at's not >> enough information: it could be 70, 80, 90, or 100. >> >> Does Washington place any other restrictions on the finite field or >> on the curve? > > Hi David, > > I cannot see any restriction placed on the curves or the fields > used. Justin >

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8.13 release cycle: request for reviews [abelian groups]

2007-11-19 Thread David Joyner
On Nov 19, 2007 6:33 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 19, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > >> I still don't believe this algorithm. > >> > >> Look at this example: > >> > >> sage: K

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8.13 release cycle: request for reviews [abelian groups]

2007-11-19 Thread David Harvey
On Nov 19, 2007, at 6:59 AM, David Joyner wrote: >> Further down the road, Drew Sutherland is thinking about writing a C+ >> + library for computing things like orders, exponents, structures of >> generic abelian groups. Basically you give it a "black box" th

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8.13 release cycle: request for reviews [abelian groups]

2007-11-19 Thread David Joyner
On Nov 19, 2007 7:27 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 19, 2007, at 6:59 AM, David Joyner wrote: > > >> Further down the road, Drew Sutherland is thinking about writing a C+ > >> + library for computing things like orders, exponents

[sage-devel] Fwd: [Maxima] Interesting Comment re Mathematica vs Everybody Else

2007-11-19 Thread David Joyner
FYI (scroll down to see the mention of SAGE) -- Forwarded message -- From: Miguel Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Nov 19, 2007 7:13 AM Subject: Re: [Maxima] Interesting Comment re Mathematica vs Everybody Else To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have not played with Maple or MuPAD for f

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8.13 release cycle: request for reviews [abelian groups]

2007-11-19 Thread David Harvey
On Nov 19, 2007, at 10:10 AM, David Joyner wrote: >> I think the idea is supposed to be that part of the definition of the >> black box is that it can produce random elements, regardless of >> whether you know the generators. So for example, suppose our group is >> the m

[sage-devel] Re: Projects

2007-11-19 Thread David Joyner
On Nov 19, 2007 12:21 PM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > at Sage Days 6 Stefan Müller-Stach > >http://hodge.mathematik.uni-mainz.de/~stefan/index.html > > babelfish translation: > > http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr?lp=de_en&url=http%3A//hodge.mathematik

[sage-devel] Re: writing a new class

2007-11-20 Thread David Roe
lso put an __init__.py file in your new directory, and probably also an all.py file that controls the imports of that directory for the sage namespace. Things get more complicated if you want to add cython files, but you're not doing that at the moment. David On Nov 20, 2007 7:03 AM, Jason Grout &l

[sage-devel] Re: writing a new class

2007-11-20 Thread David Harvey
understands the sage build system will probably give you a better answer in a moment but since I'm already awake You might need to add 'sage.server.notebook.widgets' near the bottom of setup.py. That script copies files into the place where SAGE knows where to find them.

[sage-devel] Re: is anybody interesting lie groups, etc.

2007-11-21 Thread David Joyner
I think this is interesting but I wonder how easy it is to compile. Also, is there also a plan to include lie? ++ On 11/21/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Sage Devel, > > If you noticed the publicity a few months ago about E8, "the Sage > supercom

[sage-devel] Re: ArithmeticError

2007-11-21 Thread David Roe
It's fixed (patch posted to trac). As suspected, it was a bug introduced in the ell_rational_field refactoring. David On Nov 21, 2007 12:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2007 1:40 PM, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

[sage-devel] abelian groups

2007-11-22 Thread David Harvey
y unsure of how to proceed with this. Especially since there are difficult coercion issues lurking in the background. Any thoughts would be most appreciated. david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscrib

[sage-devel] Re: abelian groups

2007-11-22 Thread David Joyner
On Nov 22, 2007 9:35 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to discuss this abelian group thing a bit further, from the > point of view of design issues rather than algorithms. > > Currently in SAGE the situation appears to be

[sage-devel] Re: abelian groups

2007-11-22 Thread David Harvey
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:25 AM, William Stein wrote: > > On Nov 22, 2007 6:53 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > \> On Nov 22, 2007 9:35 AM, David Harvey > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I

[sage-devel] abelian groups

2007-11-22 Thread David Harvey
y unsure of how to proceed with this. Especially since there are difficult coercion issues lurking in the background. Any thoughts would be most appreciated. david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscrib

[sage-devel] patch for tut,tex

2007-11-23 Thread David Joyner
Hi: I created a patch fixing someoutdated parts of the tutorial. http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1251 - David Joyner --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE for French Educational system

2007-11-24 Thread David Joyner
help if you need any from the email lists at http://www.sagemath.org/lists.html I'm cross-posting to sage-forum since there may be people there interested in your project not on sage-devel. - David Joyner On Nov 24, 2007 5:20 PM, Philippe Saadé

[sage-devel] new linear_codes patch

2007-11-24 Thread David Joyner
Hi: I submitted a trac ticket with a link to a patch containing a few improvements to linear_codes.py http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1258 The new file is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/linear_code.py if you want to look at the file directly. It passed sage -t. - David

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread David Joyner
I think this looks really excellent! Possibly there is a typo on page 27. Did you mean "installation guide" where you said "programming guide"? On Nov 25, 2007 10:14 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > Sage is among the finalists of this year's Les Trophees du Libre

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread David Joyner
On Nov 25, 2007 10:59 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 25 November 2007, David Joyner wrote: > > I think this looks really excellent! Possibly there is a typo on page 27. > > Did you mean "installation guide" where you said "pr

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread David Roe
ore widely applicable. David On Nov 25, 2007 2:35 PM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > don't you think you should add examples closer to "applied math" as > Discreet Fourier transform, financial math, Finite Element Method, etc > ? > >

[sage-devel] Re: patch for SymPy <--> SAGE conversion, please review

2007-11-25 Thread David Roe
Py and the SymbolicRing canonically isomorphic? Can every SymbolicRing element be cast into SymPy? David On Nov 25, 2007 9:13 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I fixed my bad patch, now it passes all tests in 2.8.14: > > http://sagetrac.org/sage_t

[sage-devel] Re: patch for SymPy <--> SAGE conversion, please review

2007-11-25 Thread David Roe
gt; parents are different, and if so do some other behavior (i.e., eventually > raise > a TypeError). So that makes me nervous. It would be better to just > directly do a call to the have_same_parent function, like in the > implementation > of _verify_canonical_coercion_c in coer

[sage-devel] Re: Breaking News: Trophees du Libre

2007-11-29 Thread David Joyner
Wow - think is fantastic! Thanks very much for preparing slides and presenting SAGE so well. William: Can we add something to the SAGE website about this? There is this quote from Stallman on their webpage: " With 113 participants from 18 countries, 'Trophées du Libre' is unquestionably the lar

[sage-devel] Re: windows

2007-11-29 Thread David Harvey
ou are > not running 5.13. Source downloads total about 4,000, so the binary > Windows download share is *huge* either way and we really need to get > on the Windows desktop. So, hypothetically speaking, if I wanted to help with windows development, what are my options for getti

[sage-devel] Re: windows

2007-11-29 Thread David Harvey
up a box at U Washington to have a homogeneous development environment > and so on. If this can be done, that could be a great help. I do have access to my wife's windows machine, but it has a habit of freezing fairly regularly, and to be honest I don't enjoy using it very much.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage equivalents for Maple number theory functions

2007-11-30 Thread David Roe
Excellent list! Maybe I should take a break from p-adics and do some of these. Some of the gaps should be quite easy to fill in. David On Nov 30, 2007 12:45 PM, Stephen Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I've lurked on this list for a time, comment

[sage-devel] Re: Tutorial to translate in french

2007-12-02 Thread David Joyner
The "tutorial" and "constructions" links on http://www.sagemath.org/documentation.html are what you want. On Dec 2, 2007 12:41 PM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi all, > > as I said last week, I am willing to give a little help for the usage > of SAGE in french educational syste

[sage-devel] Re: Raising matrices to a power

2007-12-03 Thread David Harvey
M^2 using repeated squaring". But your suggestion is quite interesting. Maybe first check that mathematica is getting the right answer, and not some stupid floating point approximation or something. david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, se

[sage-devel] Re: Raising matrices to a power

2007-12-03 Thread David Harvey
t. We should have done that for polynomial multiplication too, that would be way faster. david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options

[sage-devel] Re: Java3D usable in any form?

2007-12-03 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 3, 2007 7:21 PM, Nils Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Concerning interactive 3d vis tools: > > Is there currently *any* way of getting Java3D to work reliably > together with sage on, say Mac G5 systems running OSX and on i386/ > amd64 with linux? It doesn't necessarily have to be from

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Weaning

2007-12-04 Thread David Harvey
keep track of where you truncated to, but it's only used in a more strictly algebraic setting, it's not really part of the symbolic calculus package. Is it possible for the symbolic calculus package to do something similar to this? What about creating a PowerSeriesRing with the

[sage-devel] Re: soon everyday will be a Sage day

2007-12-06 Thread David Harvey
Yeah, I would be much more inclined to spend hours writing doctests if I knew there were like ten other people doing so at the same time. david On Dec 6, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > Hi there, > > some quick idea such that Sage dominates our lives even more: >

[sage-devel] Re: quo_rem, __floordiv__, and polynomials

2007-12-07 Thread David Harvey
t; this in a .sage file but I couldn't make it very general -- the > polynomial hierarchy is hard to comprehend these days. Ok but if you do this, you need to implement it by hand, since NTL (the underlying implementation for most of Polynomial_integer_dense) isn't able to do this, as f

[sage-devel] Re: quo_rem, __floordiv__, and polynomials

2007-12-07 Thread David Harvey
slow for > polynomial_integer_dense_ntl.pyx and the docstring explains that we > don't know > how this is defined. I'm not sure what David Harvey's exact > questions are, but > I think we should get it figured out. An obvious fact that I'd > believe should &

[sage-devel] Re: having authors names in .py files

2007-12-07 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 7, 2007 9:50 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2007 1:32 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am certainly happy to share credit with anyone on any file I work on. > > IMHO, anyone who does anything non-trivial

[sage-devel] Re: having authors names in .py files

2007-12-07 Thread David Joyner
I am certainly happy to share credit with anyone on any file I work on. IMHO, anyone who does anything non-trivial has the write to put their name on a xyz.py file, at least if they are happy to cede their copyright to William Stein. In fact, for licensing issues, I would think it is useful to kno

[sage-devel] Re: more SAGE publicity :-)

2007-12-07 Thread David Joyner
should a wiki page which documents mention of SAGE in research > > > > (articles, books, etc.) and the media (newspapers, popular blogs). > > > > > > See > > > > > > http://sagemath.org/why.html > > > > > > > And also the similar page (

[sage-devel] Re: Please review letter to Python GHOP

2007-12-07 Thread David Harvey
omputer lab to explore => "high school students" david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://grou

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Parallelism in Sage [and MAGNUS]

2007-12-09 Thread David Joyner
I have written a few people (including Gilbert) about the possibility of interfacing with MAGNUS. The problem appears to be that MAGNUS is a gui interface and a command-line back-end, but the gui is not as modular as one would like. I hope I'm wrong and would be very happy to be corrected, but it

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: SAGE

2007-12-09 Thread David Joyner
On rare occasions the GAP support list gets an email from someone with a slow internet connection (usually from a 3rd world country) who wants to use GAP. I think everyone would agree that it is important to support mathematicians in poorer countries and someone mails out a CD or DVD. In this case

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: SAGE

2007-12-09 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 9, 2007 8:37 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2007 5:32 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On rare occasions the GAP support list gets an email from someone with > > a slow internet connection (usually from a 3rd world

[sage-devel] Vega

2007-12-10 Thread David Vevar
lease let me know. I can try and get a group of younger colleagues and graduate students who can help as well. I would be very glad if Sage would incorporate a system for dealing with combinatorial and geometric configurations, with maps on surfaces and with abstract polytopes.&q

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: blog and rss

2007-12-10 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 10, 2007 4:07 PM, Yi Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would say that unless you are really serious about blogging, using > hosted blogging is even easier. Try blogspot > (http://www.blogspot.com). Agreed. It's owned by google, so from a gmail account you can just click "more" in the

[sage-devel] Re: more SAGE publicity [new wiki items]

2007-12-10 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 7, 2007 4:50 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 7, 2007 4:02 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 7, 2007 12:58 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 07/12/2007,

[sage-devel] Re: pyglet for 3D graphics

2007-12-10 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 10, 2007 4:58 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2007 1:39 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The plots look really nice. Thanks for posting this. > > Since pyglet depends on it, I'm curious what people th

[sage-devel] Re: pyglet for 3D graphics

2007-12-10 Thread David Joyner
The plots look really nice. Thanks for posting this. Since pyglet depends on it, I'm curious what people think of opengl. On Dec 10, 2007 4:34 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > just letting you know about one great project -- pyglet: > > http://pyglet.org/ > > we use it fo

[sage-devel] Re: Vega

2007-12-10 Thread David Vevar
OT: http://vega.ijp.si/Htmldoc/people/COMOT.HTM) will have to grant a special license - most probably GPL. He also maintains the source. David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group,

[sage-devel] Re: Vega

2007-12-10 Thread David Vevar
On Dec 10, 9:27 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > > Getting the source code and clarifying the license is probably the next > > step. The closest I can find to a license while poking around a bit is > > the statement in v5init.m: > > Yep, that is the most important step. Witho

[sage-devel] Re: Vega

2007-12-10 Thread David Vevar
On Dec 11, 12:48 am, David Vevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 10, 9:27 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > dortmund.de> wrote: > > > Getting the source code and clarifying the license is probably the next > > > step. The closest I can find to

[sage-devel] Re: bug in 2.8.15 (somewhere in sage.calculus?)

2007-12-10 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 10, 2007 8:29 PM, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all. I just opened ticket #1457 (see below) > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1457 > > The following is hopefully pretty self explanatory: > > --- > > The following took place on a

[sage-devel] Re: pyglet for 3D graphics

2007-12-10 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 10, 2007 9:32 PM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2:03 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/drive_hda1/sagefiles/sage-2.8.13.alpha1$ python > > Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Nov 26 2007, 13:44

[sage-devel] since we all really love talking about licensing...

2007-12-11 Thread David Harvey
v3 only, is it possible for Sage to use my code? thanks guys david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at ht

[sage-devel] Re: using Singular's invariant_ring [new patch submitted]

2007-12-13 Thread David Joyner
11, 2007 12:12 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear David, dear Martin, > > I made the following modifications; see > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/SimonKing/patches/matrix_group.py > > - Some typos in the doc-string. Reference added. > - In the b

[sage-devel] Sparse SVD

2007-12-14 Thread David Roe
Sage currently has no mechanism to do this. Thoughts? At some point I'll probably ask for help on IRC in making an spkg since I've only been involved in writing library code and not at all on the spkg side of things. The website for SVDLIBC: http://tedlab.mit.edu/~dr/

[sage-devel] Re: DVDs and Posters

2007-12-15 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 15, 2007 2:40 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2007 10:12 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As a student, I probably wouldn't buy a DVD if it was $20 and probably > > would forget about it later and wouldn't download Sage. I probably also > > wouldn't

[sage-devel] Re: trying to define acsc(x), acsch(x) and friends

2007-12-17 Thread David Harvey
wing will solve your problem, but instead of editing files under $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-main/build/, you should edit the files under $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/... and then run "sage -b" from $SAGE_ROOT before booting up sage again. david --~--~-~--~~--

[sage-devel] Re: Getting wiki pages into the official documentation

2007-12-18 Thread David Joyner
I am definitely extremely interested. I'll be able to play around with it Friday, but probly not much before that. On Dec 18, 2007 5:55 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > since the FAQ seems to get added content on a regular basis now it > might be a good idea to include it in

[sage-devel] zn_poly -- request for testing

2007-12-18 Thread David Harvey
old = 5.23s, new = 0.92s p = 2^24 + 43: old = 25.7s, new = 20.3s p = 2^28 + 3: old = 233s, new = 111s p = 2^32 + 15: old = 1246s, new = 1313s H that last one ain't so great. That's because zn_poly excels at small-to-medium polynomials, b

[sage-devel] Re: factoring benchmarks

2007-12-19 Thread David Harvey
torisation, given the amount of work Victor put into > this. Can you try your example problems on sage.math? On the other hand, Shoup's research is mostly about the asymptotics for very large degree problems, so perhaps he didn't bo

[sage-devel] Re: traffic to sagemath.org

2007-12-20 Thread David Joyner
Does Spain in the number 2 position of "Sagemath.org users come from these countries:" mean that Spain downloads more copies of SAGE than any other country but the US? Or i it just webpage accesses? On Dec 20, 2007 12:06 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Sage Developers, > > Wi

[sage-devel] #1426: new trac view: tickets ***reported by*** given user

2007-12-20 Thread David Harvey
Hi paul, is this what you wanted? http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/report/9 david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this

[sage-devel] Re: #1426: new trac view: tickets ***reported by*** given user

2007-12-20 Thread David Harvey
On Dec 20, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Robert Miller wrote: > David, > > Did you mean to attach something to that ticket? no... sorry I put "[with patch]" but I really meant "[solution has been implemented]" but no-one ever writes that and I didn't want to fe

[sage-devel] Re: #1426: new trac view: tickets ***reported by*** given user

2007-12-20 Thread David Harvey
On Dec 20, 2007, at 8:52 PM, Yi Qiang wrote: > I believe it is supposed to be a custom view that shows tickets you've > reported, although it's not working for me. Are you logged in? (I don't suppose you're seeing tickets reported by ME? (i.e. by dmharve

[sage-devel] Re: example of a Mathematica program from my lecture

2007-12-21 Thread David Harvey
it before and I'll say it again: if someone can make working on windows as easy and legal for me as "ssh sage.math", then I would probably be able to find some time to help out. If this can be made to happen then I think you will find more people interested in working on t

[sage-devel] latex functions in SAGE?

2007-12-21 Thread David Joyner
right justifications), (b) outputting a commutative diagram, (c) outputting a simple picture environment (possibly even a 3d one), I'm not sure how to do these, I was just wondering if this seems interesting to others. I think in my case, it would make some latex typesetting easier. - Da

[sage-devel] Re: example of a Mathematica program from my lecture

2007-12-21 Thread David Harvey
On Dec 21, 2007, at 9:27 AM, Joel B. Mohler wrote: > > On Friday 21 December 2007 08:42, David Harvey wrote: >> I've said it before and I'll say it again: if someone can make >> working on windows as easy and legal for me as "ssh sage.math", then >> I

[sage-devel] Re: example of a Mathematica program from my lecture

2007-12-21 Thread David Harvey
. (4) I wonder if it's possible for the Sage foundation to set up a server and buy a small number of windows licenses for remote access. Say like 4 licenses, so only four people can be logged in at a time. Maybe that's a cost effective and legal way to d

[sage-devel] #1482: xgcd suboptimal output

2007-12-23 Thread David Harvey
s them to make a < b, and then swaps the cofactors at the end. It generally seems to handle input signs in the same way, i.e. it first does xgcd(|a|, |b|), then throws the signs back in at the end: sage: xgcd(11, 17) (1, -3, 2) sage: xgcd(-11, 17) (1, 3, 2) sage: xgcd(11, -17) (1, -3

[sage-devel] Re: Beautiful Screen Shot Collection - GHOP

2007-12-23 Thread David Joyner
in 26q moves, known to be a minimal manuever). Some conjecture this to be the "longest" move in the quarter-turn metric. On Dec 23, 2007 6:49 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David who is a high school student in Long Island, New York created 41 > screen

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.9.1

2007-12-24 Thread David Harvey
fmpz_size()... ok Testing fmpz_bits()... ok Testing fmpz_sgn()... ok Testing fmpz_set_si()... ./spkg-check: line 50: 25204 Abort trap ./fmpz-test Testing fmpz_poly_tofromstring()... ok [...] ?? david On Dec 24, 2007, at 1:50 PM, William Stein wrote: > > Hi, > > SAGE-2

[sage-devel] Re: writing an interpeter for mathematica language

2007-12-24 Thread David Joyner
Also, the "Legal questions" section of http://omath.org/wiki/Main_Page might be worth reading before you get started. On Dec 24, 2007 7:20 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ondrej > > >I am thinking for a long time already of writing an interpreter, in > >Python of course, of the Mathemati

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.9.1

2007-12-24 Thread David Harvey
est_fmpz_set_si, and now it seems to work (and subsequently fails on the test_fmpz_set_ui test, presumably for the same reason). Kind of surprising that the test was passing on all those 32-bit machines out there. Note that the G5 is a 64-bit machine, but in sage e

[sage-devel] sagemath.org metadata

2007-12-26 Thread David Harvey
of the mathematica website. I'm sure someone on this list knows how this works. Now that Sage is #1 on google, it would be good to have some of our links like this. At the very least, we should have a "notebook" link, a "download" link, and a "tutorial"

[sage-devel] Re: typo in sage tutorial

2007-12-26 Thread David Joyner
I added this to http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1544 and attached a patch. On Dec 26, 2007 8:18 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Matthew, > > Thanks for your bug report! > > Dear David Joyner (cc: sage-devel): > > This is in some latex that you

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Tutorial nits #2

2007-12-26 Thread David Joyner
I added a link to a patch on the comment section of http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1544 It passes sage -t. + On Dec 16, 2007 10:22 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 17, 2:28 am, Rich Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As reques

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: About SAGE

2007-12-27 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 27, 2007 3:40 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I occasionally get emails like the one below. There's no way I have the > time or inclination to burn and mail out DVD's of Sage to people. Does > anybody: > >(1) want to volunteer to do this sort of thing in excha

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Tutorial nits #2

2007-12-27 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 27, 2007 12:20 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 27, 5:55 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I added a link to a patch on the comment section > > ofhttp://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1544 > > I

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.9.2

2007-12-27 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 27, 2007 3:37 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Who is the release manager for Sage-2.9.2? I'm hoping for a good > release, which > happens by Jan 4, 2008, in time for making some DVD's for the AMS meeting and > having some user testing. It should thus be a bug-fix

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Tutorial nits #2

2007-12-27 Thread David Joyner
8:12 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 27, 2007 12:20 AM, mabshoff > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 27, 5:55 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I added a link to a patch on the

[sage-devel] Re: [Axiom-developer] Rosetta translations

2007-12-28 Thread David Joyner
I think this is a great idea. What distribution license does the rosetta tex file have? On 12/28/07, TimDaly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At is a document that is > designed > to help users of new systems "translate" simple ideas from their > curren

[sage-devel] Re: Most Sage spkg's are out of date!

2007-12-28 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 28, 2007 2:38 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2007 3:54 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Are there some instructions for Sage package maintainers to follow? > > I.e. what exact steps are neede to update the package? > > There are no instructio

[sage-devel] Re: factor ideals at NF

2007-12-29 Thread David Roe
The issue is that since Sage uses pari to do everything in the background, one needs to create the pari data structures, which means that you currently call nfinit on the number field, which computes the class group and unit group. This should change eventually, but right now... David On Dec 29

[sage-devel] Re: Most Sage spkg's are out of date!

2007-12-30 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 30, 2007 6:14 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2007 11:58 PM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 31, 1:51 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Disclaimer: I am a Debian user, on the way of becoming a Debian Developer >

[sage-devel] Re: first aliquot factor found by SAGE ECM interface

2008-01-02 Thread David Joyner
IMHO, this is very interesting. Perhaps this be posted to someone's SAGE blog, so it shows up on planet sage? Of course, I can post it to mine but maybe someone else wants to provide more detailed comments? On Jan 2, 2008 3:18 AM, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > William asked me t

[sage-devel] Re: AMS conference

2008-01-06 Thread David Joyner
I'll be there. On Jan 6, 2008 3:53 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The AMS exhibit booth Grand Opening is at noon on Sunday. > > I plan to meet people who are interested in helping me setup *and* who > are staying > at the 500 West at 9:30am in the lobby. We'll leave for

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >