On Dec 24, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> > I did find some occurrences of 63 instead of FLINT_BITS-1, but I don't > believe this should be causing any problems with that function. > > Since the function doesn't say fail, I can only imagine this is an out > of memory problem. But I don't see any leaks, nor any requests for > large blocks. > > Can you tell me what happens when you run fmpz-test on its own on the > G5. A global search and replace of 63 with FLINT_BITS-1 will fix the > abovementioned. I changed the 63 to 31 in test_fmpz_set_si, and now it seems to work (and subsequently fails on the test_fmpz_set_ui test, presumably for the same reason). Kind of surprising that the test was passing on all those 32-bit machines out there. Note that the G5 is a 64-bit machine, but in sage everything only compiles in 32-bit mode. david --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
