[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] new sagenb pre-release, please test

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 4:19:22 PM UTC+1, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > > Hi, > > the "sage -sws2rst" command does not display code block properly (see > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22512). > > The following pull request should fix it (to be typed from the sagenb/ > repos

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] new sagenb pre-release, please test

Hi, the "sage -sws2rst" command does not display code block properly (see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22512). The following pull request should fix it (to be typed from the sagenb/ repository at <1.0.rc0>): git pull http://tmpsagenb.metelu.net/sagenb.git master (the sha256sum of the co

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Jack Dyson wrote: > Hi William, > installed the docker version - exciting stuff - just brilliant! > thanks. We need this "sagewide" asap really. Be looking into it as I > understand more. > small question when you have a moment: > docker starts correctly, everythin

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

ok cheers Harald ! On 24 November 2016 at 11:49, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Jack Dyson wrote: >> >> any idea ? > > > > The error is: NoSuchKernel: No such kernel named ir > > That means, that the "ir" kernel for R (and many others) aren't available in > that imag

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Jack Dyson wrote: > any idea ? ​The error is: NoSuchKernel: No such kernel named ir ​ That means, that the "ir" kernel for R (and many others) aren't available in that image. I mean, you're running a local version of smc with some minimal subset of the necess

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

Hi William, installed the docker version - exciting stuff - just brilliant! thanks. We need this "sagewide" asap really. Be looking into it as I understand more. small question when you have a moment: docker starts correctly, everything works-I have SMC locally but I can't get in sage dedicated mod

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 03:54:18PM -0800, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: >Actually, since version 7.3, Sage is shipped with a migration tool >sagenb --> Jupyter, developed by Volker (cf. #19877). Indeed! Thanks you (and Jeroen as well) for making my mentions more explicit. For a smooth migratio

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On 2016-11-23 22:46, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: I have been using Jupyter locally for my teaching since two years, and am very happy with it. The only missing features have been migration tool from sagenb and interacts; both are on their way. For interacts, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

Thanks I will! enough there to think about already ! J PS nteract looks cool On 24 November 2016 at 00:07, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jack Dyson wrote: >> Right cheers for that William! will give it a go, hopefully we'll have it as >> standard at some point soon. > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

Hi Nicolas, Le mercredi 23 novembre 2016 22:46:34 UTC+1, Nicolas M. Thiéry a écrit : > > > I have been using Jupyter locally for my teaching since two years, and > am very happy with it. The only missing features have been migration > tool from sagenb and interacts; both are on their way. > >

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jack Dyson wrote: > Right cheers for that William! will give it a go, hopefully we'll have it as > standard at some point soon. If you do want to work on that, some thoughts: - There is a "painful" dependency on RethinkDB, which is a C++ program that takes a wh

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

Right cheers for that William! will give it a go, hopefully we'll have it as standard at some point soon. Best from here, J On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:00:05 PM UTC+1, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > On 23 Novembe

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Jack Dyson wrote: > Hi Dima, > > Thankyou for your quick reply - I appreciate what you said about development > of sagenb as a whole, and actually I do see the point. > > Logically therefore, as you indicate, iPython is a good alternative. > Unfortunately, it is no

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 9:29:44 PM UTC, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Hi > > On 23 November 2016 at 22:59, William Stein > wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald > > wrote: >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik > > wrote: >> >> >> >> >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:11:02PM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote: >Would jupyter be a possible replacement for sagenb if sagenb is >discontinued from active development? Is it already on a stand-alone >sagemath install? I have been using Jupyter locally for my teaching since two years,

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > On 23 November 2016 at 22:59, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote: >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I understand that opinion

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

Hi On 23 November 2016 at 22:59, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> > >> > >> I understand that opinions on usability of https://github.com/sagemath/ > sagenb/tree/newui > >>

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Hi > > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> I understand that opinions on usability of >> https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/tree/newui >> diverge. (and with the breakneck speed javascript >> frameworks are deve

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 8:11:27 PM UTC, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Hi > > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> >> I understand that opinions on usability of >> https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/tree/newui >> diverge. (and with the breakneck speed javascript >>

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

Hi On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I understand that opinions on usability of https://github.com/ > sagemath/sagenb/tree/newui > diverge. (and with the breakneck speed javascript > frameworks are developed, one may ask whether something written in 2012 is > still a great

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

All interacts appear to be working again. Thanks! Sent from my iPad > On Jun 5, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > >> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 16:39:53 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: >> Andrey, any idea when my embedded interacts will start working again? Thanks. > > Should be working now

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Thursday, 2 June 2016 16:39:53 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: > > Andrey, any idea when my embedded interacts will start working again? > Thanks. > Should be working now, please test. There was a true check (undefined === undefined), I think I'd prefer AttributeError: https://github.com/sagemath/sa

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Thursday, 2 June 2016 16:39:53 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: > > Andrey, any idea when my embedded interacts will start working again? > Thanks. > Hopefully by Monday. I still don't know what exactly is happening, but I didn't work much on it since last weekend was short on time in general and I

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Andrey, any idea when my embedded interacts will start working again? Thanks. On Monday, May 23, 2016 at 9:28:35 PM UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Sunday, 22 May 2016 15:27:26 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: >> >> Still getting the problem. Occurs on about half of page loads right now. >>> Her

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Thursday, 26 May 2016 10:34:10 UTC-6, kcrisman wrote: > > > Please report any new (or old) errors that you notice - I will try to >> fix them tomorrow (Saturday) afternoon (MST) and on Sunday/Monday. If >> something is horribly wrong and I can't resolve it by Monday evening, >> I'll pull back

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On May 26, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Thursday, 26 May 2016 10:34:07 UTC-6, kcrisman wrote: > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/33555/problem-with-encoding-german-characters/ > > > could be

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Thursday, 26 May 2016 10:34:07 UTC-6, kcrisman wrote: > > > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/33555/problem-with-encoding-german-characters/ > > could be related, or so the poster seems to imply - though probably not bad > enough to go back before 7.2. > Thanks a lot for pointing it out - th

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

> Please report any new (or old) errors that you notice - I will try to > fix them tomorrow (Saturday) afternoon (MST) and on Sunday/Monday. If > something is horribly wrong and I can't resolve it by Monday evening, > I'll pull back to the old version. > > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/335

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Sunday, 22 May 2016 15:27:26 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: > > Still getting the problem. Occurs on about half of page loads right now. >> Here's a link to an index page for the repository: >> >> http://paulmasson.github.io/sagemath-docs/functions.html >> >> The interacts are on pages for anything w

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Sunday, 22 May 2016 15:27:26 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: > > Still getting the problem. Occurs on about half of page loads right now. > Here's a link to an index page for the repository: > > http://paulmasson.github.io/sagemath-docs/functions.html > > The interacts are on pages for anything with

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Still getting the problem. Occurs on about half of page loads right now. Here's a link to an index page for the repository: http://paulmasson.github.io/sagemath-docs/functions.html The interacts are on pages for anything with an index, so try the Bessel or elliptic functions. Not all of the lin

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Sunday, 22 May 2016 14:01:26 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: > > Andrey, I have a bunch of simple interacts in Github pages of this sort > > @interact > > def _( n=slider(0,10,step_size=1) ): > > show( plot( bessel_J(n,x), x, 0, n+20, figsize=[4,2], color=(0,.5,1) ) ) > > > that randomly fail to inte

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Not a bug in Sage 7.2, just lots of new behavior for piecewise. On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 2:42:06 PM UTC-7, paulmasson wrote: > > Andrey, I've confirmed that the error comes from the piecewise function > and not the interacts. Looks like a bug in Sage 7.2, not in the test server. > > On Monday,

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Andrey, I have a bunch of simple interacts in Github pages of this sort @interact def _( n=slider(0,10,step_size=1) ): show( plot( bessel_J(n,x), x, 0, n+20, figsize=[4,2], color=(0,.5,1) ) ) that randomly fail to interact. The server returns an initial image but the interact doesn't functi

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

OK, I've pressed the button - http://sagecell.sagemath.org is now running the latest version of Sage 7.2, together with a "significantly touched up" version of the SageMathCell code itself. Please report any new (or old) errors that you notice - I will try to fix them tomorrow (Saturday) afternoon

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Andrey, I've confirmed that the error comes from the piecewise function and not the interacts. Looks like a bug in Sage 7.2, not in the test server. On Monday, May 16, 2016 at 8:50:21 PM UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Sunday, 15 May 2016 19:29:56 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: >> >> sagecell.s

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Sunday, 15 May 2016 19:29:56 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: > > sagecell.sagemath.org is 130.211.179.63 for me in San Francisco. > > Link to code >

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Sunday, May 15, 2016 at 2:37:54 PM UTC-4, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > The test server > http://cosmos.mat.uam.es:/ > is now running 7.2.rc2 with upgraded ipykernel which greatly helped > with stability. > > If no major issues are discovered by the next weekend (which will be > long

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

sagecell.sagemath.org is 130.211.179.63 for me in San Francisco. Link to code

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Sunday, 15 May 2016 17:18:37 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: > > I just tested a page with several embedded plots and three numerical WKB > calculations. The plots work fine but the WKB calculations produce the > error message: > > TypeError: unable to simplify to float approximation > > This error d

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

I just tested a page with several embedded plots and three numerical WKB calculations. The plots work fine but the WKB calculations produce the error message: TypeError: unable to simplify to float approximation This error does not occur for the servers at cosmos.mat.uam.es or sagecell.sagemat

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

I just tested a page with several embedded plots and three numerical WKB calculations. The plots work fine but the WKB calculations produce the error message: TypeError: unable to simplify to float approximation This error does not occur for the servers at cosmos.mat.uam.es or sagecell.sagemat

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

The test server http://cosmos.mat.uam.es:/ is now running 7.2.rc2 with upgraded ipykernel which greatly helped with stability. If no major issues are discovered by the next weekend (which will be long for me and I will have a bit more time), I will roll this version to all public servers and p

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:15 PM, William Stein wrote: > -1 to moving the sagenb code back into the sage git repo. The day I > removed sagenb from the sage git repo was, for me, a very happy day. > > But +1 for having people who care have the ability to push to the repo > on github and generally t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On 2016-04-15 22:46, Dima Pasechnik wrote: it does not quite work outside Sage tree. Of course not. SageNB depends on Sage. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 8:56:54 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-04-15 21:53, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Why not? You haven't answered this question. > > > > Does sagenb run without Sage now? > No, it needs Sage > Python packages can have dependencies, so the fact that it n

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

> On 16/04/2016, at 07:56, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Python packages can have dependencies, so the fact that it needs Sage does > not imply that "it's not a proper Python package". +1 sageNB has effectively been an optional package in sage-on-gentoo until I discovered the problem with sphinx

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On 2016-04-15 21:53, Dima Pasechnik wrote: Why not? You haven't answered this question. Does sagenb run without Sage now? No, it needs Sage. Python packages can have dependencies, so the fact that it needs Sage does not imply that "it's not a proper Python package". -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 8:42:59 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-04-15 21:31, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > not a proper Python package. > > Why not? You haven't answered this question. > Does sagenb run without Sage now? -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On 2016-04-15 21:31, Dima Pasechnik wrote: not a proper Python package. Why not? You haven't answered this question. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:45:10 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-04-15 19:11, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I can try to make it into a proper Python package, instead of going > > forward with #14840. > > Why do you think that #14840 does not "make it a proper Python package"??? >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On 2016-04-15 19:11, Dima Pasechnik wrote: I can try to make it into a proper Python package, instead of going forward with #14840. Why do you think that #14840 does not "make it a proper Python package"??? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-dev

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 4:13:57 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-04-15 16:15, William Stein wrote: > > But +1 for having people who care have the ability to push to the repo > > on github and generally take over maintenance. > > Any volunteers? If there is indeed somebody who i

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On 2016-04-15 16:15, William Stein wrote: But +1 for having people who care have the ability to push to the repo on github and generally take over maintenance. Any volunteers? If there is indeed somebody who is seriously willing to manage SageNB, that would be a good solution. However, by lack

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

-1 to moving the sagenb code back into the sage git repo. The day I removed sagenb from the sage git repo was, for me, a very happy day. But +1 for having people who care have the ability to push to the repo on github and generally take over maintenance. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:13 AM, William

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Who does have commit access to https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb ? > (not me). > Karl is obviously overwhelmed with other things. > If I had this access I could have reviewed at least some of these tickets > (we still would want to keep ups

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

Who does have commit access to https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb ? (not me). Karl is obviously overwhelmed with other things. If I had this access I could have reviewed at least some of these tickets (we still would want to keep upstream on github, right?) Dima On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 2:26

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: hosting the sage cell server

On Thursday, 21 May 2015 19:54:52 UTC-6, William wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev > wrote: > > If anyone in North America can provide a server instead of GCE that also > > would be fantastic. The current setup on GCE will cost about $1000/year > > Andrey, did you h

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: hosting the sage cell server

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > On Thursday, 21 May 2015 03:15:22 UTC-6, pang wrote: >> >> Sorry for the late reply, but after some talks, the department of >> mathematics of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid can offer a core i3, with >> a 256GB SSD and 30GB of RAM. >

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: hosting the sage cell server

On Thursday, 21 May 2015 03:15:22 UTC-6, pang wrote: > > Sorry for the late reply, but after some talks, the department of > mathematics of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid can offer a core i3, with > a 256GB SSD and 30GB of RAM. > Great! The more servers we have the better for the load we can

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: hosting the sage cell server

Sorry for the late reply, but after some talks, the department of mathematics of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid can offer a core i3, with a 256GB SSD and 30GB of RAM. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this g

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: hosting the sage cell server

Hallo Karl-Dieter, maybe I forgot to tell some details about the offer. I just sent Andrey an email containing some technical stuff (hosting and login details), but I would like to send some lines to the mailing lists considering our institute. Namely, I am a theoretical physicist at Goethe Unive

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: hosting the sage cell server

Yes, I've sent a request for details to Sven. For two months there will be (in a week, I hope) also a GCE instance running, we'll see what happens after that. Andrey On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:06 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > >> >> we offer two machines located in our data center (Opteron 270 with 16G

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: hosting the sage cell server

> we offer two machines located in our data center (Opteron 270 with 16GB > RAM and .5TB HDD each) to host the Sage cell server. > > Bye from Frankfurt/Germany, > Sven > Danke! William, Andrey - habt ihr das gesehen? I mean, did you see this offer? -- You received this message because yo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

On Sunday, 29 March 2015 19:39:04 UTC+1, William wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > On 2015-03-29, William Stein > wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thursday, 26 March 2015 19:48:37 UTC, Jeroen De

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > >> I just cracked open the users.pickle for sagenb, and found that there >> are 250443 total users. Of these, only 18688 (or 7.4%) actually have >> the email field set -- all others are blank. I guess these might be >> exactly the openid acc

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

I just cracked open the users.pickle for sagenb, and found that there are 250443 total users. Of these, only 18688 (or 7.4%) actually have the email field set -- all others are blank. I guess these might be exactly the openid accounts. Of these, 15058 are gmail accounts, which are probably th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On 2015-03-29, William Stein wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, 26 March 2015 19:48:37 UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2015-03-26 20:17, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage De

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

On 2015-03-29, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> On Thursday, 26 March 2015 19:48:37 UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> >>> On 2015-03-26 20:17, William Stein wrote: >>> > Hi Sage Developers, >>> > >>> > We've posted the following message on the ht

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 3/26/15 22:42, William Stein wrote: >> >> Another offer - I could delay a bit longer if somebody could move sagenb >> to oauth2... > > > FYI, this looks like the migration guide: > https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OpenID Thanks.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

On 3/26/15 22:42, William Stein wrote: Another offer - I could delay a bit longer if somebody could move sagenb to oauth2... FYI, this looks like the migration guide: https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OpenID Thanks, Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed t

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

On Thursday, March 26, 2015, Jason Grout wrote: > On 3/26/15 15:59, kcrisman wrote: > >> > We've posted the following message on the http://sagenb.org site: >> > >> > "This Sage notebook server will be shut down April 17, 2015. >> >> I am very worried about the extremely shor

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook shutdown

On 3/26/15 15:59, kcrisman wrote: > We've posted the following message on the http://sagenb.org site: > > "This Sage notebook server will be shut down April 17, 2015. I am very worried about the extremely short notice. Many users will be disappointed to lose their work.

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] IPython notebook

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > No, just like on the command line you can run vanilla IPython or IPython > with Sage enhancements. ah, great. perfect. Related to that, is there a way to discern which flavor is inside? E.g. in the case of SMC, one has to know this in order

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] IPython notebook

On Saturday, September 20, 2014 7:08:29 PM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote: > That's really cool. Does it automatically work when started from > inside the sage environment? No, just like on the command line you can run vanilla IPython or IPython with Sage enhancements. sage -ipython notebook

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] IPython notebook

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > > I've extended the IPython notebook to run Sage That's really cool. Does it automatically work when started from inside the sage environment? I'm thinking of the case, where someone is using Sage's ipython to open existing ipython files (or

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: ipython notebook in sage?

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > I think that would be great as in particular it will reduce sagecell > dependencies that have to be handled by sagecell package at the moment or by > the user installing extra optional packages. Having all UIs by default may > also encou

[sage-devel] Re: Sage notebook server virtual machine

I don't think we really need a whole separate VM for that. Its just a few configurations that need to be changed. The problem is that we currently have no way to add any preferences into the VM session, so its only possible for those in the know. Same problem with changing the keyboard layout.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook can't show really long output

On 03/12/2013 05:27 PM, Peter Chervenski wrote: Hi all, so I have this really long solution for an equation, but the Sage notebook fails to draw it for some reason. http://oi46.tinypic.com/29x7ag.jpg I thought you may want to know about this. I think the number of characters in your "reall

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Notebook can't show really long output

On 2013-03-12, Peter Chervenski wrote: > Hi all, > > so I have this really long solution for an equation, but the Sage > notebook fails to draw it for some reason. > > http://oi46.tinypic.com/29x7ag.jpg "Warning: output truncated" is normal behaviour in such cases. You can get the full, untrun

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Move/copy functions from sagenb to sage?

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > I agree that it would be nice if the non-notebook non-mathematical utility > stuff were available independently. We could just have a sage.util > submodule, say, with the convention that it must not import anything outside > of sage.util. Then

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] summer REU

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:40 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Jason Grout > wrote: >> On 2/2/13 9:24 PM, William Stein wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sage Developers, >>> >>> If you're an undergraduate, you might be interested that I'll be >>> running a small REU this summer on Sage-

[sage-devel] Re: Sage notebook blocker

On 08/25/2012 09:07 PM, Jason Grout wrote: On 8/25/12 7:53 AM, Volker Braun wrote: When you just do "sage -notebook" you are logged in with a token as password since Sage spawns the browser. So you actually do log in, its just automatically behind the scenes. This is not an option for the virtua

[sage-devel] Re: Sage notebook blocker

On 8/25/12 7:53 AM, Volker Braun wrote: When you just do "sage -notebook" you are logged in with a token as password since Sage spawns the browser. So you actually do log in, its just automatically behind the scenes. This is not an option for the virtual machine, you can't start a host browser fr

[sage-devel] Re: Sage notebook blocker

When you just do "sage -notebook" you are logged in with a token as password since Sage spawns the browser. So you actually do log in, its just automatically behind the scenes. This is not an option for the virtual machine, you can't start a host browser from within the VM. The following does n

[sage-devel] Re: Sage notebook blocker

On 8/25/12 7:34 AM, Volker Braun wrote: Is this with the unfinished 0.10 notebook? I get the following: Ah, you're right (I usually upgrade to 0.10 immediately upon install). Luckily, I do have a stock 5.2 I just compiled a few hours ago, and I just tested require_login=False, and it seems to

[sage-devel] Re: Sage notebook blocker

Is this with the unfinished 0.10 notebook? I get the following: [vbraun@volker-desktop ~]$ sage -- | Sage Version 5.3.beta2, Release Date: 2012-08-16 | | Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface

[sage-devel] Re: Sage notebook blocker

On 8/25/12 6:51 AM, Volker Braun wrote: Is there any hope that the sage notebook can be fixed to allow passwordless login again? I made this a blocker since it prevents us from shipping a no-configuration virtual machine (which is now stuck at sage-5.1), yet no progress has been made on the ticke

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: May I register sage-notebook [et al.] on Gmane?

I have received an email from Gmane telling me that it has applied for a subscription to the sage-notebook list, and sage-notebook will appear on Gmane as soon as the first message from the list is received by its server. Could someone check the subscription requests and see if this has worked?

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: May I register sage-notebook [et al.] on Gmane?

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 14:25, Keshav Kini wrote: > Thunderbox Er. Thunderbird. -Keshav Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.c

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: May I register sage-notebook [et al.] on Gmane?

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:33, William Stein wrote: >>  More concerning is the lack of support for Google >> Groups from the Data Liberation Front at Google. If our group gets >> shut down for whatever reason, do we have a backup of all messages? >> How can we get a backup? > > I'm subscribed to al

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: May I register sage-notebook [et al.] on Gmane?

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 03:03, Jason wrote: >> I have no problem with moving away from Google groups. > > Definitely not suggesting that, though I wouldn't have a problem with > that either, if the maintainers decide to do that. I was surprised

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: May I register sage-notebook [et al.] on Gmane?

I've submitted sage-notebook for archival. Gmane does not automatically know how to search the currently existing Google archives of this group, though, so only new posts will be archived, unless someone can provide an .mbox file containing old messages. Does anyone have or can anyone prepare such

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Debugger in notebook

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 19:52, William Stein wrote: > I think the single nost important feature missing in the sage notebook is > good support for interactive debugging, … yes, the one for flask is quite cool, especially the interactive shell. what's related and also missing is a list of variabl

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/19/12 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> (which exposes that font bug in mathjax). > > > Just to be clear, since your comment could be read two ways, my > understanding is the bug is in Lion, not in mathjax. Thanks. I keep forgetting

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/19/12 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote: (which exposes that font bug in mathjax). Just to be clear, since your comment could be read two ways, my understanding is the bug is in Lion, not in mathjax. Thanks, Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:09 AM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:37:00 AM UTC-8, William wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Regarding jsmath and mathjax...   It seems like we have the issues >> worked out for the Sage notebook.  Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, >> etc., for thei

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/19/12 11:37 AM, William Stein wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Regarding jsmath and mathjax...   It seems like we have the issues >> worked out for the Sage notebook.  Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, >> etc., for their persistence. > > > At what

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/19/12 11:37 AM, William Stein wrote: Hi, Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, etc., for their persistence. At what point should we merge it? I hesitate to merge it into #11080, since we've

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:37:00 AM UTC-8, William wrote: > > Hi, > > Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues > worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, > etc., for their persistence. > > I was just browsing mathoverflow, e.g., [1], and

  1   2   3   4   >