On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 8:11:27 PM UTC, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Hi > > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> I understand that opinions on usability of >> https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/tree/newui >> diverge. (and with the breakneck speed javascript >> frameworks are developed, one may ask whether something written in 2012 >> is still a great idea) >> >> You ask why sagenb is not developed further. >> 1) the sagenb's design is really dated, and jupyter notebook seems a >> better (and much better >> supported) alternative. >> 2) Another actively developed alternative is SMCs notebook, which can be >> run >> locally. >> > > In Africa we have connectivity and power issues, which requires a local > notebook. > > Would jupyter be a possible replacement for sagenb if sagenb is > discontinued from active development? > yes, it is already there: Start sage as follows:
sage --notebook='jupyter' > Is it already on a stand-alone sagemath install? > yes. For instance, even a docker container. > > Regards, > Jan > > -- > .~. > /V\ Jan Groenewald > /( )\ www.aims.ac.za > ^^-^^ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
