On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:09 AM, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:37:00 AM UTC-8, William wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues >> worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, >> etc., for their persistence. >> >> I was just browsing mathoverflow, e.g., [1], and noticed that suddenly >> their math typesetting is very, very painful to look at. It turns out >> they recently switched from jsmath to mathjax. > > > I'm not sure about that. I see one page > (http://meta.mathoverflow.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/#Item_0) > which says that they switched in August 2010. Have you changed operating > systems or browsers recently?
Actually, I used to read mathoverflow a lot in 2010, and have only read it less since then.... and I did switch to OS X Lion fairly recently (which exposes that font bug in mathjax). > That could explain the difference in > appearance. For example, mathoverflow doesn't look good with Chrome OS X > Lion, but to me it looks fine in Firefox or OS X 10.6. Very good point. > > -- > John > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
