On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Simon King wrote:
> On 18 Jul., 22:52, William Stein wrote:
>> The 2011 recipient of the Spies Sage Development Prize
>> (http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html) goes to Robert
>> Bradshaw.
>
> Congratulations, Robert! A well-deserved award!
Congratulatio
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
[...]
>>
>> What would be the advantage of having it in the SPKG itself?
>>
> That it wil be compatible with parallel building as mentioned earlier.
>
>> Like if you want to install two packages that overwrite the same file?
> I don't think w
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Guilherme wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
>> Will you create some spkg packages for the codes above? If so, I'd be
>> interested in it too, and I can test them.
>
> Once I learn how to do a spkg I will be pleased to do so. I'm reading
> the docs...
> As I mentioned I just st
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
>
>
> On May 10, 9:10 am, Ondrej Certik wrote:.
>>
>> It just occurred to me, that it should be possible to keep the current
>> SPKG format, and implement uninstall. One just needs to keep track of
>> all f
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> IMHO the list of installed files is an integral piece of package management
> and should explicitly be part of the spkg. Automatically generating it is
> not an option during parallel compilation. There should be a "spkg-files" or
That's a go
Hi Guilherme,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Guilherme wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A quick followup on the subject of finding a Python wrapper for
> SUNDIALS.
> Good news is that there are a few projects that did it already.
> I will short review what I found.
>
> 1) python-sundials http://code.google.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> [...]
>>> I was thinking about this a lot yesterday, and there are a lot more
>>> issues t
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
[...]
>> I was thinking about this a lot yesterday, and there are a lot more
>> issues to resolve, than it seems at first sight. In particular, some
>> packages like
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 6, 2
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw
[...]
>> What about
>> dependencies (e.g. if the version of Cython was updated, would all the
>> stuff depending on Cython get re-compiled?
>
> No. Only the other
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw
>>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> W
Hi,
The python's spkg-install package contains the following "-i" switch
in "make install":
# the "-i" is crucial, esp. in the case of a major upgrade
make -i install
Does anyone know why this is crucial? It seems to me that it ignores
(silences) real errors, and it bit me today (when it did si
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> [...]
>> Were I to design the system from scratch, I'd put
>> all our code (devel/scripts/...) in a single repo, along with the
>> top-level files, a
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
[...]
> Were I to design the system from scratch, I'd put
> all our code (devel/scripts/...) in a single repo, along with the
> top-level files, and a list of dependencies (spkgs). Building sage
> would fetch (locally or remotely) the depende
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:49 AM, dagss wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 5, 2011 3:42:59 AM UTC+2, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:51 AM, dagss wrote:
>> > I don't really have a say in this, but I've given this a lot of thought
>> >
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:51 AM, dagss wrote:
> I don't really have a say in this, but I've given this a lot of thought
> since I decided to drop Sage as my scientific Python distribution a year ago
> and have been searching for a new one ever since.
Just curious --- why did you drop it? Is it de
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:13 AM, mario wrote:
>
>> From: Mateusz Paprocki <>
>> > > In case people are curious, Sage (because of Singular!) takes 0.07
>> > > seconds to do the benchmark that Sympy takes 11 seconds to do at the
>> > > end of the Sympy talk: http://flask.sagenb.org/home/pub/16/
>>
ps.com
Hi,
On 6 April 2011 14:37, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wrote:
> >> -- Forwarded message --
> [...]
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wrote:
>> -- Forwarded message --
[...]
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> sorry for the massive cross-post, but since all these projects were
>> highlighted with talks at this event, I figu
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 19, 2011 7:31:21 AM UTC+1, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>>
>>> Why has a decision been made not to make a GSoC application?
>>
>> There was no such decision and I wa
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:07 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi William and others,
>>
>> what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?)
>> results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I
Hi William and others,
what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?)
results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found some
commits like:
http://code.google.com/p/purplesage/source/detail?r=2ebfec09070b4a9a549c2a51e8e9dcde9a832925#
I am thinking how to best store s
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:36 AM, leif wrote:
>
>
> On 27 Okt., 09:56, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> On 2010-10-27 09:36, Robert Bradshaw wrote:> The larger problem with the
>> current system is not that it's hard to
>> > comment on a single line, but it's way to much work to *fix* a single
>> > line.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>> > downloading Xcode or installing it is a little annoying,
>>> > but fairly straightforward even for newbies, because Apple wants to
>>> > make it easy for them. But fortran is ano
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:44 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I started Sage I viewed it as a distribution of a bunch of math
> software, and Python as just the interpreter language I happen to use
> at the time. I didn't even know if using Python as the language would
> last. However, i
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:54 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just spent the day working on code with some people, and using
> http://code.google.com with multiple cloned repositories and their
> code review system, which allows excellent line by line annotation,
> allows much better viewing o
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:22 AM, cjfsyntropy wrote:
> Sage currently ships v. 0.6.4 of sympy
> (http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard/sympy-0.6.4.p0.txt).
>
> I found the hint below in another thread. But what are the issues
> with
> upgrading sympy to v. 0.6.7? I could not find a ticket in
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, CJ Fearnley wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> Hi CJ, thanks for bringing this issue up again and for the summary.
>>
>> Il 01/10/2010 02:22, CJ Fearnley ha scritto:
>> > * Scipy 0.6.7, which is in sid (Debian's devel
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Alexander Dreyer
wrote:
> Hi,
>> This is just my opinion, but isn't the name SPKG (SAGE package)
>> already quite specialised?
> indeed, more generic would be something like PKG_ROOT, etc. But since
> spkg seems to be established as package system (at least in this
Hi,
in Femhub (http://femhub.org) I wrote a new buildsystem from scratch
using Python, so far it's a simple Python script:
http://github.com/hpfem/femhub/blob/master/spkg/base/femhub-run
and it is (so far) fully compatible with Sage in the sense that any
Sage package (should) install in Femhub a
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 at 09:31PM -0700, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Are there any plans to integrate this with sphinx? Here is an example
>> (go to the very end of the page):
>>
>> http://theoretical-physics.net/dev/src/m
Hi Dan!
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been working on a new version of SageTeX and I'd like some
> feedback. There are two major changes:
[...]
>
> Please test, report, and comment on anything above. Thanks!
Are there any plans to integrate this with sphinx
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason whatsoever to have g95 code in ATLAS, given we don't
>> build
>> ATLAS on OS X?
>
> No opinion - this sounds fine, but is beyond my knowledge.
>
>> > One more question about Mac --- how do you install gcc in there? Using
>>
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
>
>> +1 to move to FC.
>
> I raised this back in November 2009 - William is against using FC.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg31854.html
I read this, I think that
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
>>>
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> There's odd bits code scattered around in Sage that do tests for g95, which
> is an old Fortran 95 compiler that in any modern Linux or Unix systems.
>
> According to Wikipedia
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G95
>
> gfortran was
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> I suppose another point of relevance is that there is a slight possibility
>> that it could also be used in Python for the native Python bignums, which
>> would hopefully make norm
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:55 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
Yes:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/d9824f455407ee23
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To un
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the last few weeks I've spent time optimizing code, among other
> things. A surprising number of random things I look at in Sage are
> too slow by a factor of 10-100,
> usually due to programming style. One way to help to r
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:52 PM, rjf wrote:
> Here are some postdocs, some in computational science and parallel
> computing.
>
> https://jobs.llnl.gov/psc/jobs/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/s/WEBLIB_LL.VIEW_JOBS_LL.FieldFormula.IScript_View_Jobs_LL?TITLE=&JOB_CAT=PD&;
>
> The one that was called to my attention
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:43 AM, dagss wrote:
> On Jul 11, 12:20 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> 2. Sage at EuroScipy:
>>
>> Another thing -- though most talks mention Cython, not one single talk
>> given about actual engineers/scientists doing work even mentioned Sage
>> -- and there were over 30 ta
Hi,
here I put some technical info about how to publish your own book at lulu.com:
http://ondrejcertik.blogspot.com/2010/07/theoretical-physics-reference-book.html
Overall it cost me $20 and I am now having the physical hardcover book
in my hands.
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an emai
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, François Bissey
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several
>> problems in my sagemath package. I was in vacation during most of
>> Mandriva 2010.1 freeze, and did not fully test the package for some
>> time, but I am worki
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:16 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> Amazingly, University of Washington has >= 1 postdoc jobs starting in
> 2011. It's a very competitive position, and pays pretty well.
> Anyway, here is the job ad:
>
> http://www.math.washington.edu/Appts/jobin
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> I hope he is. I haven't seen any patches since 2009-03-13 and it
>> segfaulted my code, but I fixed it and sent him the patches. (I pulled
>> his repo usi
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> Thanks for this. Btw, I just revived this cython based line profiler:
>>
>> http://github.com/certik/line_profiler
>>
>
> Is Robert K not
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just solved a relatively easy riddle, and I thought I'd share the results:
>
> # Cython version of cputime():
> cdef extern from "time.h":
> ctypedef unsigned long clock_t
> cdef clock_t clock()
> cdef enum:
>
Hi Jens, Minh and Alex,
thanks a lot for the permission!
ONdrej
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jens Rasch wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> that's fine.
>
> regards
>
> Jens
>
> On 14 July 2010 05:32, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> about
Hi,
about a year ago I got a permission from Jens (CCed) who wrote the file:
http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/tip/sage/functions/wigner.py
to use his (original) code in SymPy and license it as BSD. We just got
more people interested in that, so we'd like to port it now. So I
thought I would
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:57 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Maurizio wrote:
[...]
>> The problem I see now regarding scientific computing, is the not so
>> seamless integration of numpy-scipy: do you think SAGE may improve
>> numpy arrays management with cleaner synta
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:20 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. IDE's
> There are a number of IDEs that can be used for Python development:
>
> * Spyder (free, cross platform) -- http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/
> * Eric (free, cross platform) -- http://eric-ide.python-projects.org/
>
Hi,
for FEMhub (http://femhub.org/) got rid of the Sage buildsystem
completely and wrote a simple 414 lines Python script that does the
same (that we need -- for Sage more stuff would have to be ported). I
talk a little bit about it here:
http://ondrejcertik.blogspot.com/2010/06/week-june-5-june-
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> When matplot lib builds on 't2', it says:
>
> BUILDING MATPLOTLIB
> matplotlib: 0.99.1
> python: 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Jun 5 2010, 17:43:53) [GCC
> 4.4.1]
> platform: sunos5
>
> R
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2010-Jun-07 10:12:33 +0200, Fredrik Johansson
> wrote:
>>I've heard good things about OFTC.
>
> I'll second that. Myself and a couple of friends have been monitoring
> a channel on OFTC for the last four months and it seems quite stable.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Bill Page wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time there was
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/
>>
>> "Source Python Distribution (SPD) is a Python distribution and many
>> optional (mainly scientific) packages. Every
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> Will it be possible to also use it outside of Sage? E.g. I guess if
>> you do "setup.py install" in mpmath, that it would compile the Cython
>
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Version 0.15 of mpmath is now available on the website:
> http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
>
> It can also be downloaded from the Python Package Index:
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpmath/0.15
>
> Mpmath is a pure-Python libra
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:21 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>&g
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are revisiting prerequisites for FEMhub (currently based on the
>> Sage system) and we are thinking of doing the following changes:
Hi,
we are revisiting prerequisites for FEMhub (currently based on the
Sage system) and we are thinking of doing the following changes:
* make Python a build dependency (Python will still be built and used
as the python in FEMhub)
* make bzip2 a build dependency (I checked and it seems to be on t
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:21 AM, leif wrote:
> On 1 Jun., 17:45, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> just found a video of a Matlab running in the phone:
>>
>> http://www.mathworks.com/mobile/videos.html
>
> Actually only an iPhone app.
>
> (Regardi
Hi,
just found a video of a Matlab running in the phone:
http://www.mathworks.com/mobile/videos.html
for inspiration...
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For m
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On May 4, 5:08 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> I was bitten by this too in FEMhub. setuptools simply sometimes want
>> to download things from the net. Is there some way to disable it? I
>> want the build to just fail, if I ac
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:59 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>> This isn't related to my new package includes. Jinja2 wasn't one of those
>> new packages. The problem is that SageNB is installed before Jinja2 is
>> installed, so it's more of a pro
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:55 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:49 AM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>>
>> According to our documentation, the "src" directory in an spkg should
>> contain the "vanilla upstream code". I've seen a few spkg's that
>> modify this by deleting stuff:
Hi Craig!
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
>> I can see now:
>>
>> === python-2.6.4.p4 (Craig Citro, Jan 17, 2010) ===
>> * Move MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET fix to sage-env, so that it's
>> used for all python-related spkgs. (This was leading to a
>> build issue with numpy and
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
>>> Hi Ondrej,
>>>
>>>> Let me know if you have any hints what to try.
>>>&
> bsd users: I made > 100GB free in /scratch, so please use /scratch
> on bsd.math.
>
> -- William
Thanks, that really helps. I reduced my home dir to 62MB.
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-d
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
>> Hi Ondrej,
>>
>>> Let me know if you have any hints what to try.
>>>
>>
>> For sage, the issue was that Python was getting built with
>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
>> Let me know if you have any hints what to try.
>>
>
> For sage, the issue was that Python was getting built with
> MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET set to 10.4, which is no longer valid in
> 10.6. This was leading to some issues with ve
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:35 AM, John Hunter wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:14 AM, John Hunter wrote:
>>
>>> But even simple tests are failing with::
>>>
>>> jdh2...@bsd:~> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/devtest/lib/
>>> PYTHONPATH=~/devtest/lib
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In the most recent patch, it does this:
>>>
>>> 1. The fi
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2:29 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 19, 11:13 am, Robert Bradshaw
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Nick Alexander wro
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote:
>> > I've noticed that the graph editor is viewable in published worksheets.
>> > Should this behaviour be disabled?
>>
>> Why?
> It's confusing. It looks like you can edit the page while you really
> can't. It'd better if the javascript were d
Hi Pablo!
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote:
> 1) I have updated the content at
>
> http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/pangulo/etc/te.zip
>
> with some corrections. It is still not recommended for installation,
> just for reading.
>
> 2) I have left a server in the machine:
rmes, e.g. hermes1d is BSD, hermes2d is GPL.
Our goal is to eventually ship nice worksheets directly with femhub
(http://femhub.org), so I guess they would use the same license as
femhub, which uses the same license as Sage, e.g. GPL.
>
>> > By the way, Ondrej Certik just mentioned he
em using symbolic integrals over a general triangle
> * evaluate the result on the vertices of the triangles
> * solve the linear system of PDEs
> * plot it
Do you have some example worksheet doing this? That's the exact same
workflow that we want to use in FEMhub --- only we want to
Hi Rado,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Rado wrote:
> Thanks to Kevin (one of William's undergrad students), we have some
> major improvements to the graph editor. Take it for spin at
> http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/js-graph-editor/ (a Sage patch will
> follow soon). I have only tested it i
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:47 PM, G B wrote:
> Burcin--
>
> Now that I've managed to divide the discussion between two groups, I
> should try to help organize the mess I made.
>
> Ondrej mentioned in the sage-support discussion that he's opened
> ticket 8564. Unfortunately I don't understand the p
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> Congrats Minh, thanks for all your persistence hard work!
Congrats!
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
I am having problems understanding how "I" (complex unit) in Sage:
sage: type(I)
somehow becomes a NumberFieldElement_quadratic and that fails to
convert to the sympy's I:
ond...@raven:~/repos/sympy(pu)$ MPMATH_NOSAGE=yes sage -python
bin/test sympy/test_external/test_sage.py --pdb
===
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:41 PM, G B wrote:
> I raised this in sage-support, and am now reasonably convinced this is
> a bug. Guidelines say the next step is to raise it here. The full
> thread is at:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/02f3446e68381346#
>
> but th
Hi William!
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:34 PM, William Stein wrote:
> 2010/2/22 Ondrej Certik :
>> Hi,
>>
>> some FEMhub users are confused by seeing the name "Sage" in
>> warnings and error messages, and in various installation scripts
>> and messag
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at 6pm today we'll be giving a presentation about FEMhub[0] at the
> 2010 Northern California Western Nevada
> Jr. Science and Humanities Symposium[1, 2].
>
> I'll talk about sympy as part o
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> Ondrej,
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>> > On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
>> &
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In the older Cython docs here:
>>
>>
>> http://modular.math.washington.edu/home/was/www/home/gfurnish/old/sage-3.0.6/doc/prog/node55.html
>>
>> The _sig_on and _sig_o
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A student of mine is going to add to sage the capability of plotting
>> lots and lots of fractals easily. E.g.,
>>
>> sage: fractals.[tab]
>> lots of stuff
>>
>> sage: fractals.julia([params]).sho
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune
> wrote:
>> Can a standard spkg in Sage use CMake?
>>
>> http://www.cmake.org/
>>
>> I ask because I'm seriously considering moving from a straight make
>> system for Frobby to CMake
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Oscar Lazo wrote:
>>
>> On 23 feb, 10:39, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>>>
>>> If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the opportunity for
>>> someone to publish worksheets, there is a section:
>>>
>>> "Browse published Sage wo
Hi,
some FEMhub users are confused by seeing the name "Sage" in
warnings and error messages, and in various installation scripts
and messages. They are there because FEMhub uses some
functionality of Sage (as Ubuntu uses some functionality of
Debian). However, the word "Debian" does not appear in
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anyone have a ReST -> notebook converter even crude?
>
> For my talk on Tuesday, I'd like to go through the Category primer,
> inside the notebook.
Could you post here your ReST document? I am interested in how you
re
Forwarding to sage-devel. Ethan made petsc working with FEMhub (so it
should work in Sage too).
Ondrej
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ondrej Certik
Date: Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [femhub] Re: adjusting versions and using/abusing FEMHUB
To: fem
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Ethan Coon wrote:
> Ok, so I uploaded an spkg, but it's not exactly right yet. A few issues:
>
> 1. my stupidity -- the flag should actually be --FLIBS="f95" , not
> --FFLAGS="-lf95*". This isn't necessary to get a working PETSc and
> petsc4py, but it is both mo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in Kaiserslautern, at a workshop on connecting mathematical
> software for polyhedral geometry with software packages for Gröbner
> basis (polymake, gfan, singular).
>
> I tried to code a small example demonstrating how to call Sa
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
[...]
> * only tested in firefox and chromium in Linux. In opera (on linux),
> shift+enter and backspace (when deleting cells) behaves funny, for
> some reason, preventDefault (event) doesn't work in Opera. I didn't
> test
Hi,
just wanted to give a brief status update. I improved the pyjamas
version of the notebook here:
http://gamma.sympy.org/nb/
it now shows the evaluate button, adding new cells work, joining cells
work. Click on the "About" to get the sourcecode (BSD licensed).
Compared to the current Sage not
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Oscar Gerardo Lazo Arjona wrote:
>
>> I am studying quantum mechanics for the first time, and I would love to
>> have some software dedicated to solving quantum mechanics problems to make
>> my life easyer.
>>
>>
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have uploaded my BSc Honours thesis [1] to the Sage website. You can
> also find my thesis at my website [2]. The Sage publications [3] page
> has also been updated accordingly. It took me months to prepare the
> document and get
1 - 100 of 774 matches
Mail list logo
