On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:23:51 +0200
> Hikari Boulders wrote:
Hi,
>> about 4ti2: is there some master-plan to make sage more modular or
>> smaller?
Moore's law does mostly take care of this, but unless I am mistaken
only a few times spkgs ha
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:35 AM, pang wrote:
> sudo rm -rf /dev/shm && sudo **ln -s /run/shm /dev/shm
>>
>
> It really looked promising, but unfortunately, it didn't work: is a reboot
> necessary?
>
Eh, it depends: What went wrong?
Cheers,
Michael
> --
> You received this message because y
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> (hate new google groups...)
>
> I think you may be able to make a link from /dev/shm to /run/shm
That seems to be mostly an issue if you use Debian or Debian based distro
since they are following the HFS standard - see
http://wiki
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> Cannot OS X run a VM?
Sure, but Sage does have a native 32 bit as well as 64 bit OSX port,
so aside from the lag of supporting a new OSX major release there
never is the need for one. Or did I just not get your point?
Cheers,
Mich
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> One clarification regarding credit for #6042: I shouldn't get reviewer
> credit for it. David rebased and reviewed all of it himself.
Fixed.
> Best,
> Alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
Hi Brian,
no need to CC me on bug reports you send to sage-devel.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For mo
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:57 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> 2009/5/14 Michael Abshoff :
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>>
>>> Your comment about the sum function suggests to me that something
>>> similar might be behind the
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:55 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>
>
> Will 4.0.a0 be released sometime today? (I'm leaving early tomorrow morning
> for SD15 and may not get internet access quickly when I arrive.)
Well, my main goal is to get ecl into 4.0.a0. Since the status meeting
from Thursday was bu
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Your comment about the sum function suggests to me that something
> similar might be behind the weird thing I reported yesterday.
Yeah, we ought to suggest to the pari people to rename such generic
function. Even with C++ code in Sage havi
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Hmm, two possibilities:
>>
>> (a) This is a 32 bit issue, but since William tested that code on OSX
>> I doubt it.
>> (b) You have multiple heads, so please check. Maybe otherwise there
>> is also junk laying around for you somewhere that
On Mar 30, 7:29 am, Ryan Hinton wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I'm not entirely sure of the protocol for giving credit, but M.Albrecht
> also helped with #5519 and #5535, and C.Witty looked over my patch for
> #5535.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Ryan
Ok, when I understand you correctly the credits for those two p
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
Hi Ondrej,
>> If building openmx really benefits from "make -j" you might consider
>> putting something clever in spkg-install to detect "available cores" and
>> maybe build using them...
>
> Yes, but I need this for all packages, so I t
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:50 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > checking the number of available CPUs... 1
> > checking the number of available CPUs... 1
> > checking for x86 cpuid 0x0 output... unknown
> > checking for the processor vendor... Unknown
> > 262144
> > 32768
> > secon
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:40 AM, mathieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>
> An attenpt to install sage 3.1.1 has failed on a linux
> system:
> Linux mammitum 2.6.25.5-1.1-pae #1 SMP 2008-06-07 01:55:22 +0200 i686
> i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> CPUinfo gives:
> processor : 3
> vendor_id : Gen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:40 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5? I'm
> > wondering whether to bother building the latter having just do
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:57 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 28, 4:45 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mabshoff wrote:
> > > On Jun 28, 2:10 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > What is the policy on breaking backward compatibility of pickling a
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Francois,
>
> I just found out that I have xmaxima in my $SAGE_LOCAL/bin folder.
> I am pretty sure no one ordered that. It seems that it will build by
> default
> if the configure script finds tk. Actually I had a look at
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:41 AM, IzI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Iztok,
> I humbly apologize for bothering you with such a trivial problem, the
> libc6-dev package was missing on my installation.
>
No problem and don't worry about it since everybody around here has had
something very similar
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:27 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >> No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary from Sage directly
> >> with the timings
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Dr. David Kirkby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 7, 3:12 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oops, pressed return by accident.
> >
> > This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day
> > since I wanted to use it internally to te
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Dr. David Kirkby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Since I have errors building polybori, and its a known issue which I
> don't think I will be able to fix (not knowing C++), is there a way to
> try to build Sage without this? Even if there is no chance of it
> workin
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
Hi Dave,
>
> I've got a bit further with building sage-3.0.3.alpha1. After a few
> hacks to ntl and flint, I got problems when building polybori
It is a known issue - see below.
>
> 1) One of the pro
종현 정 wrote:
Dear Jong Hyun Jung,
>
> Dear whom it may concern,
>
> I am writing about a bug report on plot_vector_field.
>
> **
>
> * OS Name: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
> o Version: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600
> o Processor: x86 Famil
Eduardo Ocampo wrote:
> hhmm,
>
Hi Eduardo,
once more: Please stay *only on the list*, i.e. do not email me privately.
> let me see : m4, lbstdc++6, gcc (apt-get says that there's no 4.2
> version of gcc available so I have de 4.1) and g++. For the others I
> had already the latest version.
>
eduardo wrote:
> Hi Michael! thanks for the answer!
>
>
Hi Eduardo,
please stay on list since I see an insane amount of email volume, so a
private email from somebody I do not "know" tends to slip through the
cracks.
> On Jun 4, 5:23 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> dortmund.de> wrote:
>
Jonathan wrote:
Hi,
> Since no one else has responded, I'll go ahead and say that I don't know
> anything about this. Maybe this email will be a reminder to someone who
> does know. (Or maybe any questions have already been taken care of off
> list?)
>
>
I did have a chat with rlm about the p
Jonathan wrote:
Hi,
> Since no one else has responded, I'll go ahead and say that I don't know
> anything about this. Maybe this email will be a reminder to someone who
> does know. (Or maybe any questions have already been taken care of off
> list?)
>
>
I did have a chat with rlm about the p
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Michael,
>
Hi Franco,
>
> Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into
> Ubuntu to answer your other questions).
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yep. Maybe we should just subscribe the update email to sage-announce?
> That
> > sounds like the easiest and simplest solution since no one needs to
> remember
> > to email them ;)
>
> Great idea. Please do that.
>
Done.
>
> William
>
>
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~---
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:51 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Sage Devel,
>
> This looks like a good thing.
Yep. Maybe we should just subscribe the update email to sage-announce? That
sounds like the easiest and simplest solution since no one needs to remember
to email them ;)
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:53 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Lon Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Sorry, but for the life of me I can't find where the system requirements
> are
> > for SAGE 3.0.1 binary for Mac OS X... ple
FYI. This is no #3237
Original Message
Subject:GMP-ECM 6.2 is out
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:48:01 +0200
From: Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
for those interested in applications of GMP, a new release of GMP-ECM is out
at
On May 16, 1:50 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Michael (cc: sage-devel and bcc: some sponsors),
Feel free to forward since there is no BCC in Google groups ;)
> What's the quick status on:
>
> * OS X 64-bit porting
Cleaning up patches. One crash issue related to libSingular
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:43 AM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Troy,
>
>
>
> >
> >Hi Tim,
> >That does look like an interesting program. It's possible that many
> >scientists would be interested in it.
> >Has someone already packaged it in an rpm that you know of?
>
Hi Troy,
Sage has a
Hi,
we are listing major features for Sage 3.0.1 at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.0.1
Currently we would like you to add some text, i.e. a couple sentences,
describing what is new/changed/improved so that someone who is not a
specialist can understand what was added.
Convex Hulls And Po
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I attempted to build the 3.0.1alpha1 packages for Debian, but it doesn't
> build, apparently due to some type errors. The build log is attached --
> I'd appreciate any guesses as to what's going on here.
>
>-Tim
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:22 PM, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the ordering of the elements does not at all affect the
> correctness of the output--the most mathematically correct thing would
> be to output a set. This change can be due to any number of things,
> but it's probably
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I decided to go ahead and open a ticket for it with a patch for spkg-
> install.
> I noticed that the CXXFLAGS needed a bit of spring cleaning as well.
> The ticket is #3079.
I noticed and saw the CXXFLAGS issue. That puzzle
John Cremona wrote:
Hi,
> Thanks for the explanations!
>
> For my own build, I recovered by doing "sage -ba" as previously
> reported. So I don't know whether the original problem (running sage
> for the first time after an apparently successful build) was caused by
> the SAGE_PBUILD thing or no
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On May 2, 3:19 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi,
>> Looks good to me. I think Python is actually in the top 5 languages
>> now, isn't it?
>>
>
> just for completeness, released today:
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/10065
> - Readers' Choic
[CC to sage-devel - this email somehow didn't make it on first try :(]
Hi guys,
When I apply both patches from #2755 to my 3.0.1.rc0 merge tree I get
the following failure in totallyreal_rel.py:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/totallyreal_rel.py
*
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 25, 4:49 pm, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed that the timeit short-cut seems more broken than normal (at
> > least I think this worked previous to 2.10.2:
> > sage:
gri6507 wrote:
>
> I think the issue was that I was running on a system which had a
> relocated sage v2.9.3 prior to a relocated sage v2.10.1 (current
> version) and the location of the matplotlibrc file changed between the
> two sage version. All I did was remove the ~/.matplotlib and the
> ~/.sa
Carl Witty wrote:
>
> With the help of alfredo on IRC (who had the same problem), I was able
> to track down this problem. The error message is:
> rijndael.c: In function 'do_padlock':
> rijndael.c:2062: error: cant find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS'
> while reloading 'asm
>
> and the f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tom,
> I'm developing a new cython class, and I currently have it print a message
> to tell me when it gets deallocated.
>
> When I instantiate the class in a function, __dealloc__ gets called -- but
> if I instantiate at the commandline and don't capture the referenc
Brian Lauber wrote:
> Hi Michael.
Hi Brian,
> I was looking at the Trac page for SAGE and noticed that
> you are doing a little work with SELinux. I'm actually planning on
> building some custom SELinux policies for SAGE in the next two weeks,
> and I don't want to step on your toes in the proc
On Feb 2, 2:19 pm, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rc5 fails to build on my Pentium M laptop:
Hi Paul,
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -I../src
-I/tmp/sage-2.10.1.rc5/local/include -g -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -Wall
-Wpointer-arith -MT rijndael.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/rijndael
William Stein wrote:
>
> Steve (cc: sage-devel),
>
> Any chance you would have any time to port GAP to Itanium, as described
> in your email below? So far, I failed to find anybody to do this so
> far (is there
> anybody out there on sage-devel who "is C programmer who can manage
> a few lines of
Martin Rubey wrote:
> "Michael Abshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
[somehow Martin's reply didn't make it onto sage-devel (yet)]
>
>> > * licensing issues need to be sorted out since the APL2 is not
>> > GPL-compatible. I don't kn
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
>> Mike, could you point me to your code?
>
> I've attached the _very_ rough version I started awhile back. It just
> does FormalPowerSeries and DataStream.
>
>> I actually wonder why you would
>> reprogram it in Sage and not interfacing the aldor-combinat l
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2007 03:13 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> I've been spending a bit of time with symmetric functions recently.
>> In the near future, I'll be making a commit that adds support for
>> Hall-Littlewood, Macdonald polynomials, and quasisymmetric functions.
>>
Klas Heggemann wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
>>
Hi Klas,
>> mmh, I remember fixing that. Maybe it snuck back in or Bill has fixed
>> it upstream only.
I will open a ticket for this in a minute or two so it doesn't get lost.
>>
>> Either way I will check this out on my Sun 10 box. Last time I checke
Klas Heggemann wrote:
>
> On 15 nov 2007, at 16.45, Michael Abshoff wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> However the build does not seem to be functional:
>>>
>>> sgray:sage-2.8.12>./sage
>>>
Hello folks,
the following might be of some interested to us, maybe a little project
for Bug Day 5:
Original Message
Subject: New mpn_get_str and mpn_set_str
From:"Torbjorn Granlund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Mon, October 29, 2007
John Voight wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
Hello John,
> I've asked for a few pari functions in SAGE, and now I'm about to ask
> for another: I need nfrootsof1.
>
> For my own edumacation, I'd slightly prefer if someone were to show me
> how to do it. I can't seem to follow Martin's write-up in the
>
didier deshommes wrote:
>
> 2007/9/25, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 24, 10:42 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 9/24/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Some build notes:
>> > > - Singular needs "-lcurses" whenever "-lreadline" is sp
William Stein wrote:
>
> On 9/28/07, Eliz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I still can't build flint-0.2.p3.spkg.
>
> Looking at your first message, I just realized that
> you are building using
>
> "gcc version 4.3.0 20070531 (experimental)"
>
> This is the unstable active development version of
Michael Abshoff wrote:
> [This is CC to the google group sage-devel]
>
> Hello clisp folks,
>
> the Sage people are currently trying to make Sage run on Solaris in 32 bit
> mode. That involves a working clisp to make Maxima work.
>
> We compile clisp without optimizati
[This is CC to the google group sage-devel]
Hello clisp folks,
the Sage people are currently trying to make Sage run on Solaris in 32 bit
mode. That involves a working clisp to make Maxima work.
We compile clisp without optimization and without libsigsev. Everything
builds fine, but lisp.run cr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
Hello Michael,
> I just want to mention, that the size of the compiled PolyBoRi
> libraries is dependend on build settings.
> On our 64-BIT compute server, it is less than 6 MB.
>
Can you elaborate when and how much of boost is needed for the build? I
would al
Bill Hart wrote:
>
Hello,
> To possibly add to the sage.math woes yesterday, I was testing a new
> memory manager just before the slowdown. It had the unusual property
> of allocating very many gigabytes of swap space in small chunks and
> very little actual memory. My presumption was that the s
William Stein wrote:
>
Hello,
> I'll wait for the answers to the above questions. I would be fine
> with including
> scons in SAGE. I think it's already in one of the optional packages
> (I can't remember
> for sure though). It's just a little python program, after all.
>
> It would take a
William Stein wrote:
Hello,
>
> On 8/13/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I tried rsyncing htdocs to my mirror today and the file system on
>> sage.math is very slow (hours+ to rsync a 120MB file and still waiting
>> on that one). One oddity I came across is this one process:
>>
>> rl
William Stein wrote:
Hello,
>
>> (Random question, since it just caused problems for me again - it there
>> a way to sign up for sage-devel with a non gmail email address?)
>
> I don't know. I don't think so. Let me know if this isn't true.
In my experience the participation in google groups
Chris Chiasson wrote:
>
> Someone has to be evil and mention this:
> MediaWiki
>
SAGE already uses a MoinMoin Wiki installation.
> If you are willing to sacrifice absolute editorial control, the wiki
> documentation can develop organically at its own pace and in the
> manner that the writers cho
William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> The problems you mention below should all be fixed now.
> Let me know if they aren't.
>
> -- William
>
Hey William,
all fixed now, I am mirroring out as I write this.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to th
Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
Hello,
>> >> current stable release on a whim, so I think getting Sage into Ubuntu
>> is
>> >> a
>> >> much more reachable goal. It also seems that Ubuntu is getting a lot
>> >> more
>> >> mindshare in the *desktop* these days (compared to Debian unstable).
>>
>> I meant D
Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> While solution (1) is against the "Debian Way" (2) is next to impossible
>> from a debugging standpoint, i.e. which version of libSingular, g++ and
>> clisp are you using? I don't think anybody intends to get Sage into the
>> official Debian distribution because maintaini
William Stein wrote:
>
> On 7/17/07, Georges Khaznadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello, I would like to make a Debian package of Sage.
>>
>> I recently attended a talk of Professor Tsai who uses it in Taiwan, and
>> it was pretty convincing.
>>
>> Apparently, Sage depends on other software whi
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> SAGE does take a very long time to build, especially on slower
> hardware. How many hours do you think is has been running? There
> could be a circular build issue (especially with such high make
> numbers) but I've never encountered it.
>
> autoconf is run for each of t
Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
>> Slightly OT: Do you plan to release the Small Scale AES with you
>> mutlivariate crypto system package any time soon? I have some code to
>> create SymbolicData.org output for the CTC examples (which still needs
>> to be cleaned up). I am currently at CoCoA School and n
David Joyner wrote:
>
> Hi:
> Some SD4 photos at posted at
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/sd4photos/images.html,
> or at least they will be in 5 minutes or so.
> - David
>
Sorry, but
You don't have permission to access /home/wdj/sd4photos/STA70416.JPG on
this server.
(and probably o
William Stein wrote:
> Michael,
William,
>
> I put an ampersand at the end of this file:
>
> /Applications/Sage-2.5.app/Contents/MacOS/Sage-2.5
>
> and now the jumping goes away.
Great.
>
> I think the best way to build the SAGE OS X app is to
> literally build it in place in that subdirecto
Gregory Vanuxem wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 11:38 -0700, mabshoff a écrit :
>>
>>
>> > I am using a bash 3.2 instead of the standard 3.0
>>
>>
>> Going back to bash 3.0 fixes it. I will file a bug at the Maxima bug-
>> tracker.
>
> And I am forwarding this mail to the Maxima mailing l
William Stein wrote:
>
>
> This appears to be a GPL'd Hungarian project that hasn't been updated
> in almost 4 years.
While that seems to be true for the website at the University of Szeged,
the sourceforge site is still active:
Posted By: kovzol
Date: 2006-07-25 23:22
Summary: WMI 1.0.2 has be
Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have appended my original source of information, maybe you find this
> helpful.
Thanks for the info. Should this be added to general SAGE documentation? I
am sure once I am though/working on the code I will have additional
suggestions.
> Also, (even more off-
Joel B. Mohler wrote:
>>
>> x[0] should do the trick (as it is equivalent to *x in C) and is the
>> recommended way in the Pyrex documentation. But I used the deref trick
>> so
>> far.
>
> Yep, you said that in the slides in your SD3 talk. I didn't understand
> the
> point when I read the slides
sunshine wrote:
>
> What is GSoC?I am a student,don't know that so much.
>
I would recommmend you "google" for it ;)
Not suprisingly, the first hit is http://code.google.com/soc/
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-
78 matches
Mail list logo
