William Stein wrote: > <SNIP>
Hello, > I'll wait for the answers to the above questions. I would be fine > with including > scons in SAGE. I think it's already in one of the optional packages > (I can't remember > for sure though). It's just a little python program, after all. > > It would take an absolutely massive amount of convincing to even begin > to convince me to include the entire 17MB C++ boost library in SAGE. Well, PolyBori just about destroys any code out there for GBasis-computations over boolean rings including Magma's F4 as well as Faugere's F4 & F5. And it isn't only massively faster, but also needs substancially less RAM. Just for the presentation they did in March or so, I am not sure the MEGA paper had any benchmarks in them. Or ask Martin about the CTC examples. It is definitely worth it, espcially if one could cut down the amount of boost code needed to compile. > > William > Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
