Well, it works with the real ball field or with more precision :
R = RBF
a = exp(-12*pi)
R(a),a.n(100)
([4.2411511830161e-17 +/- 2.87e-31], 4.2411511830160775440174644060e-17)
Another place to ask questions is https://ask.sagemath.org/
Le lundi 5 juillet 2021 à 08:04:44 UTC+2, Brian Lawrence a éc
Hi,
I'm new to Sage, and I'm running across some unexpected behavior involving
numerical evaluation of exponentials involving pi.
In my version (Sagemath 9.2), the following code
exp(-12.0*pi).n()
gives the output below.
0.000
The true value of the exponential is something like 4e-
Op zo 4 jul. 2021 om 19:27 schreef Nils Bruin :
> Concerning the dutch translation: Especially for professional/business
> terminology, the Netherlands have a strong preference for just borrowing
> the english term (this may be a bit different in Flemish-Belgium), so "open
> source mathematics" or
On Monday, July 5, 2021 at 7:08:04 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote:
> Does anyone have experience working with graphic designers? How much would
> it cost to get a logo designed by a professional?
+1 for designing the logo anew. I never liked the amateurish logo. Now Sage
deserves a better lo
My brother is one, and I've tried dealing in the private market before. I'd say
the variation is (0,\infty). Also there's a huge difference between amateurs
and professionals so that kind of justifies the price variance, but if it was
my choice, I'd ask the graphics designer of my institute (to
Does anyone have experience working with graphic designers? How much would
it cost to get a logo designed by a professional?
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 10:27:07 AM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> Oh my, those logos are absolutely atrocious! Never mind the translation:
> the text is clipped to incompr
Hello,
I have now fixed a few svg issues, that were preventing the correct display
of text in firefox. It was working in chrome.
Nils, would you be so kind as to tell more precisely what you find so
*atrocious* ? Colors ? shapes ? text ? everything ? any suggestions for
improvements ?
also, i
Oh my, those logos are absolutely atrocious! Never mind the translation:
the text is clipped to incomprehensibility anyway (at least when displayed
in firefox) -- and that includes the english language one. On the plus
side, these logos are so obviously bad that I don't think anybody
reasonable
