Ivan Andrus writes:
> On May 25, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
>> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>>
>> Since I've been working on sage-mode a bit recently I thought I would look
>> at trac and try to fix any sage-mode related bugs there. I found #2666
>> which wants to make
On May 25, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>
> Since I've been working on sage-mode a bit recently I thought I would look at
> trac and try to fix any sage-mode related bugs there. I found #2666 which
> wants to make sage-mode a standard package.
On May 29, 12:11 pm, Emil wrote:
> Thanks! I'm trying to reproduce it, but haven't been successful so far.
>
> But in the meantime, it does seem slightly unsatisfactory that
> something with an obvious deterministic algorithm can fail for random
> reasons. And that this has been observed in a real
Jeroen Demeyer writes:
> On 2012-05-29 13:42, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> What does the acronym "FAT" in "SAGE_FAT_BINARY" refer to?
>
> It's not an acronym, it's the word "fat".
Maybe it is a binary For All Types of processors? :)
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
On 2012-05-29 13:42, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> What does the acronym "FAT" in "SAGE_FAT_BINARY" refer to?
It's not an acronym, it's the word "fat". On Linux x86 systems (either
32-bit or 64-bit), the MPIR binary is built with support for various
kinds of processors. At run-time, the libr
A number of people are working on transitioning Sage to git (see #13015),
and the meaning of spkg will likely change dramatically in a way that
affects 2 and 3.
In particular, spkg install scripts for both standard and optional spkgs
will be included in the sage repository, as will pointers to ups
On 2012-05-29, mmarco wrote:
> I have contacted the author of the kbmag package (which has no
> copyright note at all), and he told me that "it is distributed under
> no license, it is completely open source". I have asked him permission
> to distribute it under the gpl license. So i have a legal
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> An author to GAP's package "braid" suggests to switch to an officially
> GAP-supported package "mapclass", which offers a superset of the
> functionality.
> Should we do this?
I vote yes. (I assume the license is the same.)
>
> Dima
>
>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:10 PM, mmarco wrote:
> I have contacted the author of the kbmag package (which has no
> copyright note at all), and he told me that "it is distributed under
> no license, it is completely open source". I have asked him permission
> to distribute it under the gpl license.
I have contacted the author of the kbmag package (which has no
copyright note at all), and he told me that "it is distributed under
no license, it is completely open source". I have asked him permission
to distribute it under the gpl license. So i have a legal question:
would it be enough if he gav
An author to GAP's package "braid" suggests to switch to an officially
GAP-supported package "mapclass", which offers a superset of the
functionality.
Should we do this?
Dima
On 2012-05-29, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Dmitrii (Dima) Pasechnik
> Date:
On May 29, 2012, at 13:42 , Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> What does the acronym "FAT" in "SAGE_FAT_BINARY" refer to?
Normally, "FAT" refers to a file format that contains executable images for
multiple architectures. I think that for Sage, it refers to a binary that will
run on multiple v
On 05/29/12 16:42, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> What does the acronym "FAT" in "SAGE_FAT_BINARY" refer to?
>
FAT Acronym Triplet
(it just means fat, i.e. big)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-deve
What does the acronym "FAT" in "SAGE_FAT_BINARY" refer to?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-dev
On 5/29/12 2:11 PM, Emil wrote:
Thanks! I'm trying to reproduce it, but haven't been successful so far.
But in the meantime, it does seem slightly unsatisfactory that
something with an obvious deterministic algorithm can fail for random
reasons. And that this has been observed in a real situatio
Thanks! I'm trying to reproduce it, but haven't been successful so far.
But in the meantime, it does seem slightly unsatisfactory that
something with an obvious deterministic algorithm can fail for random
reasons. And that this has been observed in a real situation.
Emil
--
To post to this grou
On May 29, 2012, at 09:54 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On May 29, 2012, at 00:41 , Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
>> see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13057
>>
>> This seems to be a bad regression. On reasonable machines it can take
>> 5 seconds to get the docstring of an object by using
On Monday, May 28, 2012 11:01:56 PM UTC-7, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> At ticket #12321, I proposed that we exclude some of Python's self-tests
> when we run spkg-check. I have a draft spkg that implements this.
> Please test the spkg with Sage 5.0 or one of the 5.1 betas with:
>
> sage -
On May 29, 2012, at 00:41 , Jonathan Bober wrote:
> see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13057
>
> This seems to be a bad regression. On reasonable machines it can take
> 5 seconds to get the docstring of an object by using '?'. Does anyone
> have any idea what happened? I don't see any
On May 29, 7:29 am, Emil wrote:
> On 29 May 2012 15:21, William Stein wrote:
>
> > Can you give an example? E.g., a matrix and a random seed?
>
> Not easily... If it is really necessary I can find the matrix that it
> failed on. Although most of the time it works on this matrix...
That would be
Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.0.1.rc0.
Source archive:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0.1.rc0/sage-5.0.1.rc0.tar
Upgrade path:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0.1.rc0/sage-5.0.1.rc0/
Binaries can be found at:
http://boxen.math.washington.
On 5/27/12 2:27 PM, William Stein wrote:
They are also redistributed copyrighted content, which is one of the
categories when you file a complaint.
What is the problem with copying something from trac? Do we have a
license statement for material on trac? I guess if not, then it is all
copyr
On 5/28/12 5:20 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote:
I think the blue background matches our various logos and sagemath.org a
lot better than the old background color did, at least. Personally I
like the new color theme, but I don't really have any justification for
my purely personal preference.
-Keshav
On 2012-05-28 23:01, Dan Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At ticket #12321, I proposed that we exclude some of Python's self-tests
> when we run spkg-check. I have a draft spkg that implements this.
> Please test the spkg with Sage 5.0 or one of the 5.1 betas with:
>
> sage -i -c http://sage.math.washin
On 29 May 2012 15:21, William Stein wrote:
> Can you give an example? E.g., a matrix and a random seed?
Not easily... If it is really necessary I can find the matrix that it
failed on. Although most of the time it works on this matrix... (It is
a matrix that has arisen in a genuine application
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, Emil wrote:
> Calling .echelonize on a rational matrix, I received:
>
> File "matrix_rational_dense.pyx", line 1432, in
> sage.matrix.matrix_rational_dense.Matrix_rational_dense.echelonize
> (sage/matrix/matrix_rational_dense.c:14327)
> File "matrix_rational_dense.pyx", l
Hi,
I think some years ago, I had a similar problem because the
documentation of some of the functions were not using raw string :
r"""
"""
instead of
"""
"""
Sébastien
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sa
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 10:48 -0700, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's what happens when you don't renew a domain name. Somebody gets
> the domain, copies your site, but then makes the page slowly
> degenerate into spam! http://www.sagetrac.org/
>
> The company that rents this domain name is:
Calling .echelonize on a rational matrix, I received:
File "matrix_rational_dense.pyx", line 1432, in
sage.matrix.matrix_rational_dense.Matrix_rational_dense.echelonize
(sage/matrix/matrix_rational_dense.c:14327)
File "matrix_rational_dense.pyx", line 1583, in
sage.matrix.matrix_rational_dense.Mat
You are right, i didn't think about the license. Still, my point is
valid even if we restrict it to GPL gap packages.
On May 29, 12:54 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, mmarco wrote:
> > One of the complains i have heard from my colleagues that use sage
> > (and i have
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dmitrii (Dima) Pasechnik
Date: 29 May 2012 12:29
Subject: Re: [GAP Forum] problem with AutomorphismGroup
To: Markus Szymik
Cc: Alexander Konovalov , GAP Forum
Dear Markus,
Thanks.
I can confirm that this is a bug in in Sage's
gap_packages-4.4.12.p
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, mmarco wrote:
> One of the complains i have heard from my colleagues that use sage
> (and i have noticed myself) is the lack of certain gap packages in the
> sage distribution. There is an spkg with some of them, but most are
> missing. Also, it is not easy to fin
One of the complains i have heard from my colleagues that use sage
(and i have noticed myself) is the lack of certain gap packages in the
sage distribution. There is an spkg with some of them, but most are
missing. Also, it is not easy to find documentation on how to install
gap packages in the sa
On 2012-05-29, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Maarten Derickx writes:
>> By the way. Your name might also be on that website. See
>> http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac .
>
> Interesting - my name is not there. That suggests that they crawled trac
> quite a while ago.
Yep. They still locate me in Ireland,
see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13057
This seems to be a bad regression. On reasonable machines it can take
5 seconds to get the docstring of an object by using '?'. Does anyone
have any idea what happened? I don't see any changes to
sage/misc/sagedoc.py or sage/misc/sageinspect.py i
35 matches
Mail list logo
