> Agreed - probably there is a way to link this tohttp://wiki.sagemath.org/Talks
I just added a link to it.
> I'd also say that it would be good to show in thetalkhow to make an
> alias for hg, which is assumed in thetalk(or that one has it
> installed globally). Some developers will just have S
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 at 11:22AM +0900, Dan Drake wrote:
> It might also be nice to ask for help, instead of just say that Sage is
> math software. I like the git ad on the StackOverflow page -- it tells
> you exactly what they want help with.
Okay, I clearly need more coffee. The image got hidden b
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 at 05:12PM -0800, Eviatar wrote:
> Here is a basic design:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/48xqfm5
That's nice, although it would be good to mention something about the
languages invovled. It's possible to make big contributions to Sage
without knowing much or even caring about the mat
I like it. It would be fun to see what other designs you come up with.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Eviatar wrote:
> Here is a basic design:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/48xqfm5
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this gro
I always advice to build from source. Takes a bit of time though...
On Jan 23, 12:49 am, Niles wrote:
> On Jan 22, 11:37 am, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > The 10.6 version will probably not run on Leopard, though one could
> > try. Usually the Sage on Mac has been forward-compatible only, based
> > on
Here is a basic design:
http://tinyurl.com/48xqfm5
Thoughts?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage
On Jan 23, 12:26 am, slabbe wrote:
> Hi Emil,
>
> Well, here is how I interpret it. You tested the file sage/misc/
> citation.pyx and one of the examples inside of that file failed.
> Comparing what was expected and what you got, I think that there no
> whitespace error : the results are really
Wow, that would be a great opportunity for Sage. I'll see if I can
come up with an image.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://g
Hi Emil,
Well, here is how I interpret it. You tested the file sage/misc/
citation.pyx and one of the examples inside of that file failed.
Comparing what was expected and what you got, I think that there no
whitespace error : the results are really different.
Maybe the term "whitespace error" lea
Wow, that would be a great opportunity for Sage. I'll see if I can
come up with an image.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://g
On Jan 22, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 1/22/11 8:06 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Pedro Cruz wrote:
>>
>>> I was tring to remember if "simple" equality was "=" or "==".
>>>
>>> The email is just to mention this:
>>>
>>> #1/3 Sage command-line: (4.6)
>>> sag
I didn't had too much time to do anything with this for some time,
anyway that's how far I got back then. Maybe someone will find it
useful, or probably not.
http://sagenb.org/home/pub/2654/
It isn't tested well enough I believe and could be better, but using
pylab trough statement
with sagelab:
On Jan 22, 11:37 am, kcrisman wrote:
> The 10.6 version will probably not run on Leopard, though one could
> try. Usually the Sage on Mac has been forward-compatible only, based
> on the support list emails. So the 10.4 binary should be just fine.
>
> What this means is that we could use some
A partial answer to my own question: The installation instructions at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadAndInstallationGuide
and
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/binary.html
look pretty easy to update. Now I just need to know what to recommend
for 10.5, 64-bit Mac users.
-Niles
--
T
> I know I have a 64bit OS and processor, so the first two seem better.
> But I'm running OS X 10.5, not 10.6, so the 10.6 in the filenames
> scares me. Also I could not find any information about the difference
> between the -Darwin and the -Darwin-app versions.
>
> Should I go for the older sage
The following comes from a friend and long-time gap user who has
decided to give sage a real try. How tough would it be to make the
install choices more clear? Also, should I tell him "sage-4.5.3-
OSX-32bit-10.5-i386-Darwin.dmg" (note that it's an older version of
sage too)?
thanks,
Niles
I wa
On 1/22/11 8:06 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Jan 22, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Pedro Cruz wrote:
I was tring to remember if "simple" equality was "=" or "==".
The email is just to mention this:
#1/3 Sage command-line: (4.6)
sage: 1=2
()
TypeError: Must construct a function with a tuple (or list) of
There is some documentation about using Weave, but it doesn't work.
Anybody knows about weave and has an idea what's going on here?
sage: import weave
---
ImportError Traceback (most recent call
On Jan 22, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Pedro Cruz wrote:
> I was tring to remember if "simple" equality was "=" or "==".
>
> The email is just to mention this:
>
> #1/3 Sage command-line: (4.6)
> sage: 1=2
> ()
> TypeError: Must construct a function with a tuple (or list) of
> symbolic variables.
>
>
I just found out that Stack Overflow provides free advertising for open source
projects looking for developers:
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/01/free-vote-based-advertising-launches-third-round/
All we need is someone who can create an advertisement image (to certain
standards) and then to
In case of non-cooperative sysadmins,
can't you just have instances of MPI installed on your accounts on the
slaves?
I presume each slave has a Sage installation (with OpenMPI), so this
probably means you need to create symbolic links to appropriate
directories, and/or perhaps setting LD_LIBRARY_PA
On Jan 22, 11:26 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Jan 22, 5:32 pm, Mikael Vejdemo Johansson
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, Parallel Python looks really neat. However, I actually use quite
> > a bit of the inter-process communication parts of MPI in my code; and
> > PP doesn't seem to have as useful primitive
I was tring to remember if "simple" equality was "=" or "==".
The email is just to mention this:
#1/3 Sage command-line: (4.6)
sage: 1=2
()
TypeError: Must construct a function with a tuple (or list) of
symbolic variables.
#2/3 Sage notebook:
1=2
(returns nothing)
#3/3 Python command line:
Hi Rob
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 06:43:26PM -0500, David Roe wrote:
> Cython classes by default don't have a __dict__ (which is why you're
> seeing the error below). Maybe the deprecated_function_alias should
> be modified to allow for deprecated aliases in cython classes.
> David
>
> On Sun
Hi Volker,
> I agree that I need to set the attribute Element not element_class in my
> path. I'll fix it after the dust in #10496 has settled.
>
> I'm still confused about _element_class(). If you need to compute the
> correct value of Element, then just do that in the constructor. So i
On Jan 22, 5:32 pm, Mikael Vejdemo Johansson
wrote:
> Yeah, Parallel Python looks really neat. However, I actually use quite
> a bit of the inter-process communication parts of MPI in my code; and
> PP doesn't seem to have as useful primitives for that.
>
> Is there really no sensible way to use
On Jan 22, 6:41 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> > What is the right way to specify the path to Python includes in
> > Sage's spkg-install scripts, is there a convention on this?
>
> -I$SAGE_LOCAL/include I would guess?
I had to use
-I$SAGE_LOCAL/include/python2.6
which looks a bit too specific...
On 2011-01-22 02:58, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> yes, it appears to work, great!
> I only had to use _sig_on/_sig_off in place of sig_on()/sig_off().
Please don't! You can use sig_on() and sig_off() since sage-4.6.1. At
the moment they behave identical to _sig_on and _sig_off but when #9678
is merged
Yeah, Parallel Python looks really neat. However, I actually use quite
a bit of the inter-process communication parts of MPI in my code; and
PP doesn't seem to have as useful primitives for that.
Is there really no sensible way to use OpenMPI and Sage on more than
one computer?
// Mikael
On Jan
29 matches
Mail list logo
