> I know I have a 64bit OS and processor, so the first two seem better. > But I'm running OS X 10.5, not 10.6, so the 10.6 in the filenames > scares me. Also I could not find any information about the difference > between the -Darwin and the -Darwin-app versions. > > Should I go for the older sage-4.5.3 32-bit version because I'm > running Leopard and not Snow Leopard?
The 10.6 version will probably not run on Leopard, though one could try. Usually the Sage on Mac has been forward-compatible only, based on the support list emails. So the 10.4 binary should be just fine. What this means is that we could use someone building a 10.5 or 10.4 binary on Intel more regularly. The 32/64 shouldn't make a difference in terms of whether it runs, though. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
