On 2011-01-22 02:58, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > yes, it appears to work, great! > I only had to use _sig_on/_sig_off in place of sig_on()/sig_off(). Please don't! You can use sig_on() and sig_off() since sage-4.6.1. At the moment they behave identical to _sig_on and _sig_off but when #9678 is merged, _sig_on and _sig_off will continue to work as before (i.e. badly broken) while sig_on() and sig_off() should work better.
> What is the right way to specify the path to Python includes in > Sage's spkg-install scripts, is there a convention on this? -I$SAGE_LOCAL/include I would guess? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
