Yeah, Parallel Python looks really neat. However, I actually use quite
a bit of the inter-process communication parts of MPI in my code; and
PP doesn't seem to have as useful primitives for that.

Is there really no sensible way to use OpenMPI and Sage on more than
one computer?

// Mikael

On Jan 22, 1:37 am, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
> I'd have looked into using Parallel Python (http://www.parallelpython.com/)
> which is just a Python library.
> If it worked with Sage, it would be a worthwhile addition to Sage
> packages...
>
> Lately there is an ongoing project to make Sage notebook well-
> scalable, but I do not know
> if parallel code execution came into consideration.
>
> On Jan 21, 9:49 pm, Mikael Vejdemo Johansson <michiex...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In the course of working on an idea for parallel and distributed
> > Gröbner bases, I have an example implementation of the idea using Sage
> > for the commutative algebra routines. This has been — mainly — very
> > pleasant, with the ease of calling Sage from Python, and with the ease
> > of using the included (optional) SQLAlchemy, MPI4Py and OpenMPI
> > packages.
>
> > However, I now find myself in the situation where I need to go to
> > several computational nodes, and not only several cores on a single
> > node. And I am getting some problems that I'd need advice for.
>
> > Using OpenMPI across several nodes is easy. It will, given easy enough
> > shell scripts and specification files, ssh to each node and launch
> > processes there, and take care of all process enumeration and
> > communication issues. However, especially when using the OpenMPI
> > included with Sage, there is a bit of a chicken vs. egg problem. The
> > shell created by ssh to a new node will not automatically be in a Sage
> > shell environment; but the OpenMPI I'm using sits inside Sage. It
> > doesn't seem like the »sage -sh« command necessarily takes an optional
> > command to run afterwards — so I can't have OpenMPI do something like
> > ssh nextnode 'sage -sh mpirun -np $NP $COMMAND'
>
> > Looking through the mailing list archives, I have found one
> > discussion, in which DSage was suggested for anyone _actually_ wanting
> > to run Sage in a cluster context, and then a few years later, another
> > discussion removing DSage from the system due to non-use. Is there
> > _anything_ I can do to make my computation work at this point?

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to